View Single Post
Old 07-30-2012, 04:43 PM   #5
Qncvqpgfg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
373
Senior Member
Default
Arsl

1. Al-Hasan did not agree with apointing Yazid as his successor, in fact, Al-Hasan passed away before Mu'awiyah. According to some narrations it also went against the explicit treaty agreed to by Al-Hasan and Mu'awiyah.

2. There are, as far as I know, no authentic narrations that Al-Hasan was poisoned at the order of Mu'awiyah. However, many Ulama of Ahl al-Sunnah lean towards believing in the narrations implicating Yazid, rather than his father.

3. Talha and Zubayr both decided to leave the battle field, as they were reminded of the Prophetic ahadith that Ali ibn Abi Talib will be on Haqq, etc. Zubayr was killed by Amr ibn Jurmuz after having left the battlefield, and Talha was shot by Marwan ibn al-Hakam.

May Allah Ta'ala be pleased with all the Sahaba.

wa Allahu a'lam
1) yazid wasnt hassans successor, muawiyyah was. and hassan agreed to this. a narration states taht teh prophet saw said hassan will bring two factions together

2) can you provide the narrations and which scholars lean this way?

3) the narration didnt exactly say that ali will be on haqh. bring the full narration so we can see the exact wording inshallah. be careful because shia will twist things. there is a narration in their most authentic book called usool al kafi that to bring someone to shia by lying is better than saving an oppressed person. they are habitual liars and willing to say whatever to bring you to shia. they will give half narrations, twist things and do anything possible with no care as to whether they are being truth or deceitful
Qncvqpgfg is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:23 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity