View Single Post
Old 09-24-2008, 04:47 PM   #19
cmruloah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
Ramo, you are on crack. Freddie and Fannie were the entities most exposed to sub prime mortgages.

No. They weren't (unless you're using a bizarre definition of "exposed"). Because Fannie and Freddie were more regulated than the rest of the market, mortgages they offered required large down payments and for borrowers to document their incomes. They engaged in far less risky behavior than the rest of the market.

Every party when in power loves to crow about home ownership numbers, but it was the Democrats from Carter on who legestlated that banks must have a certain percentage of their loans be made to sub prime borrowers. They created the very concept in the first place, and this is the logical conclusion.

This is only one piece of the puzzle of course, but to pretend the Democrats are not at the heart of this problem is fantacy.

Utterly ridiculous spin. Subprime mortgages took off in the past few years because of legislation passed decades ago to stop banks from using race and marital status as proxies for risk. Yeah, right.

Are these really the right's new talking points?
cmruloah is offline


 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity