DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**lopushok** · 07-26-2008, 11:36 PM

BK, this is one of those places where you are proving you are not intelligent. A person who breaks the law, by definition, cannot be law-abiding. If you abide by the law, you aren't breaking it. If you break the law, you aren't abiding by it. That freaking simple. You missed my point. She was law abiding, in that she obeyed the highest law of the land, the constitution. How can you say that she was not law abiding, when she appealed to the higher law rather then the lower law?

I accept that she broke a law, but the law has no force, because it violates a higher law.

Once again, just because a person disagrees with you, doesn't make them stupid Che.

07-26-2008, 11:36 PM	#30
lopushok Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 335 Senior Member	BK, this is one of those places where you are proving you are not intelligent. A person who breaks the law, by definition, cannot be law-abiding. If you abide by the law, you aren't breaking it. If you break the law, you aren't abiding by it. That freaking simple. You missed my point. She was law abiding, in that she obeyed the highest law of the land, the constitution. How can you say that she was not law abiding, when she appealed to the higher law rather then the lower law? I accept that she broke a law, but the law has no force, because it violates a higher law. Once again, just because a person disagrees with you, doesn't make them stupid Che.
	Quote