DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate - View Single Post

**Domovoy** · 05-18-2007, 02:28 AM

Inasmuch as the infrastructure supporting breaking the law for illegal immigration can be discouraged, it makes it tougher for AQ, et al. to repurpose the infrastructure for its own ends.

I don't see how the "infrastructure supporting breaking the law for illegal immigration" is going to be substantively affected by this. There will be some token efforts at enforcing the border, the illegals already in America will get amnesty and then the cycle will begin again, ending with another amnesty in a couple decades.

How bad did it hurt the GOP when Reagan did it?

I don't know. It would seem to affect the GOP on a state/congressional level more than the presidential one and I'm not really educated enough on American state politics in the 80's to speak intelligently on the issue.

05-18-2007, 02:28 AM	#8
Domovoy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 355 Senior Member	Inasmuch as the infrastructure supporting breaking the law for illegal immigration can be discouraged, it makes it tougher for AQ, et al. to repurpose the infrastructure for its own ends. I don't see how the "infrastructure supporting breaking the law for illegal immigration" is going to be substantively affected by this. There will be some token efforts at enforcing the border, the illegals already in America will get amnesty and then the cycle will begin again, ending with another amnesty in a couple decades. How bad did it hurt the GOP when Reagan did it? I don't know. It would seem to affect the GOP on a state/congressional level more than the presidential one and I'm not really educated enough on American state politics in the 80's to speak intelligently on the issue.
	Quote