[WepKeyday]

Three Choices:

Negrocentrists. Mainly West African-descended Negroes living in the US, their beef comes mainly from the fact that Semitic people as well as Berbers have enslaved their race throughout history and forced them to convert to either Islam or Christianity. They also envy the great Middle Eastern civilization of Ancient Egypt with fiery passion, which is why they claim it. They can't bring themselves to accept the fact that Northern Africa is superior.

South Asian Hindu nationalists. Their anger towards Middle Easterners comes mainly from the fact that Middle Easterners have pwned South Asia and that many of them have abandoned their uncivilized pagan ways and converted to a far superior religion, Islam. The ones who converted are rightfully trying to distance themselves away from their less enlightened cousins. They also desperately wish to associate themselves with Persians and other Indo-European speakers even though non-Muslim Indians can hardly be called West Eurasian racially.

White nationalists. Their jealousy comes mostly through being unable to accept the fact that the first great civilizations and advancements such as writing and the alphabet came from the Fertile Crescent, not Europe. They often have trouble accepting the fact that the Middle East has historically been the most progressive region in the world and the enormous influence Mesopotamia has had on Rome and Greece.


Disclaimer: Negrocentrists do not represent all blacks, Hindu nationalists do not represent all South Asians and WNs do not represent all whites. I'm not saying that they do. They're mainly fringe people without much meaning in life which need to be put on blast.

[Yarikoff]

Other Middle Easterners.

[ppfpooghn]

White nationalists. Their jealousy comes mostly through being unable to accept the fact that the first great civilizations and advancements such as writing and the alphabet came from the Fertile Crescent, not Europe.

If you meant it to stormfronters I hardly doubt they do know about the origin of fenician alphabet

[cajonnmu]

Other Middle Easterners.

Touche, however this is about which foreign group has the most valid reason to hate Middle Easterners.

[67Irralphaisa]

This is a troll thread and pointless. Most of the people you mentioned only had contact with certain Middle Easterners and the Middle East is so diverse in itself.

However, since you took little jibes at South Asia, I'll answer.

South Asian Hindu nationalists. Their anger towards Middle Easterners comes mainly from the fact that Middle Easterners have pwned South Asia and that many of them have abandoned their uncivilized pagan ways and converted to a far superior religion, Islam. They also desperately wish to associate themselves with Persians and other Indo-European speakers.

1. The Mughals and rulers of the Delhi Sultanate weren't Middle Easterners. They were Turko-Mongols from Central Asia and they became South Asian themselves over times as they inter-married with local royalty. Although, they spoke Persian and were heavily influenced by Persian culture. I also think they had some Persian officials in their ranks but the rulers were still Turko-Mongol.

2. The Durrani (Afghan) Empire was also non Middle Eastern but rather South-Central Asian and it only made it into Northern/Eastern India and not for that long as their empire fell apart with the rise of the Sikh and British Indian Empires. Although, technically, the empire lasted from 1747–1826. However, during this time, Ahmad Shah Durrani and his army had to enter Punjab 6 times to subdue the Sikhs who were divided and fighting amongst themselves at the time. It's actually similar to how Pashtuns were fighting among themselves when the Sikhs joined together under Ranjit Singh and took over Peshawar and other parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

3. The British Empire wasn't Middle Eastern.

4. The only proper Middle Easterners to enter South Asia were the Persians and the Achaemenid Empire which essentially only ruled over Western Pakistan regions where the people were other Iranic speakers themselves like the Pashtun and Baloch. They had very little influence east of the Indus and the only parts influenced were small parts of Pakistani Punjab.

5. Although, some Arabs made it into Sindh, Pakistan but they did very little in the rest of the subcontinent.

6. Finally, no one desperately seeks to associate themselves with Persians other than some Pakistanis because they are Muslim and have had much more influence from Iranic speakers.

7. The Indo-European part is ridiculous. The average South Asian has no idea Hindi, Punjab, Bengali, etc. are Indo-European languages and related to Farsi and even to European languages like Russian, English, German, Italian, etc.

[goldeneggs]

i don't know

[reachmanxx]

None.

[GroosteFoessy]

Hahaha today's activity just keeps getting better and better.

[meencegic]

W e . We are not jealous
Islam is so backwards I don't understand how that's advancing

Greek and Romans were better

[XiWm9O9S]

~~~

W e . We are not jealous
Islam is so backwards I don't understand how that's advancing

Greek and Romans were better

The Middle East is not only about Islam, educate yourself about the history of the glorious region.

[ladleliDypenue]

~~~



The Middle East is not only about Islam, educate yourself about the history of the glorious region.

If it's such a glorious region, why are you demeaning it with this thread and your location? Castle of sand? That's an obvious insult toward Middle Easterners.

[WGfg4CCZ]

By

The Middle East is not only about Islam, educate yourself about the history of the glorious region.

So? The fact that the majority it's Islam
Doesn't interested me more

[YpciJQdo]

arabs came to south asia, but they were peaceful, for example when they came to kerala in the 7th century, they only came as missionaries to spread the religion peacefully, there was no violence there. The other muslims rulers from central asia later on were more destructive, they mostly came there for the loot and destruction , unfortunately in the process Islam as a religion was blamed for the destruction, which is wrong

[Catieliecutty]

arabs came to south asia, but they were mostly peaceful, for example when they came to kerala, they only came as missionaries to spread the religion. The other muslims rulers from central asia were more destructive, they mostly came there for the loot and destruction , unfortunately in the process Islam as a religion was blamed for the destruction, which is wrong

He's talking about rulers. Only Arabs that ruled anything in South Asia were mostly in Sindh and Pakistan. The rest came to spread Islam.

Anyways, I agree it was Central Asian Turko-Mongols and South-Central Asian Afghans that brought any destruction to South Asia. Well, at least the Mughals contributed in terms of culture, food, language, etc. other than 1-2 asshole rulers.

However, Afghans contributed nothing and only raped, pillaged and destroyed for the short time they were there. Fortunately, the Durrani Empire's peak was in 1761 and only a few years after it got into Northwest India. Soon after, it began to fall apart.

See here:

[clomoll]

So? The fact that the majority it's Islam
Doesn't interested me more

Ignorant fool...

[popandopulus]

Before I opened the thread… I was thinking "each other". But that option is unavailable. So I choose "Hindu Nationalists". Because I have seen a lot of argument & contempt between Indian people and other Middle Eastern peoples.

[VomsVomaMew]

Before I opened the thread… I was thinking "each other". But that option is unavailable. So I choose "Hindu Nationalists". Because I have seen a lot of argument & contempt between Indian people and other Middle Eastern peoples.

I think that's rather funny considering the longest Muslim Empire in South Asia wasn't even Middle Eastern but Turko-Mongols from Central Asia.

[zooworms]

I think the geographical location of the Middle East plays a lot into this topic.

[ligeplodore]

I think the geographical location of the Middle East plays a lot into this topic.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ion%29.svg.png

So Iran is the entire Middle East? What do you mean by this picture?

[GenrieAB]

Ignorant fool...

Yea yea I'm ignorant