[Clarissa]

If Obama was just white and not black at all would he still been elected President?

It's possible, but it all depends on how much he would've been licking Jewish ass. He did suck it up to AIPAC quite well from what I can remember, and that's the main reason why the Jews approved him as president (it sure as hell wasn't the American people; i.e., whites).

[Tibaveriafark]

It's possible, but it all depends on how much he would've been licking Jewish ass. He did suck it up to AIPAC quite well from what I can remember, and that's the main reason why the Jews approved him as president (it sure as hell wasn't the American people; i.e., whites).

About 50% of whites voted for Obama, JEws only make up about 1% or 2% of the U.S. population.

Did Jews use mind control to make all those whites vote for Obama?

[BrodiKennedy]

About 50% of whites voted for Obama, JEws only make up about 1% or 2% of the U.S. population.

Did Jews use mind control to make all those whites vote for Obama?

Not mind control, but they could've slandered him a hell of a lot more than they did in the media, if he didn't have his tongue up in AIPAC's asshole.

And it's not about statistics. Jews may be 1-2% of the US population, but they have more political influence than all blacks together (including, Obama). And you know that's the case.

Besides:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/...obamajews.html

Also, had he not been kissing Jewish ass, I seriously doubt as much as 10% whites would've been voting for him. He was hyped by the Jewish media, Hollywood (which is run by Jews) has been making movies with black US presidents for quite some time now, and so on.

[sisimelanyk]

I think Obama would have lost the Democratic race against Hillary Clinton if he wasn't black. The Clintons are very ruthless and would have no qualms about using the "sexist" card to gain votes.

Right. I think a better opening question would have been: would he have gotten the Democratic candidacy if he were white? I think the answer in this case is no. As for the presidency, fuck yes, the Democratic candidate could have been a pedophile and they still would have won. Americans were sick of the Republicans.

[anatmob]

Well if Obama was just white and not black at all would he still been elected President of the United States?

I think in my opinion Obama was president simply because he's black, he seems to be quite incompetent for the position, and many americans back 2008 were voting for him and no one had a clue what his views were, they just wanted a black president, horrible! Way to go world. Or, so if they wanted a black person for the job why did not they chose Condoleezza Rice?

Do you agree?

No,I don't agree,he would have been elected even so,because of his stupid "CHANGE" bs.
I believe one can usually tell if a politician is incompetent when he/she tries to gather most of his/her support based on negativity towards his/her opponents,but this sort of stuff actually works from time to time(see the "orange revolutions" in eastern Europe,maybe even the right-wing parties after WW1 but I'm not that keen on reading about those subjects lately),the result is that once the incompetent party/politicians get to power they usually prove to be worse than the person he/she was chosen to replace.
Obama just caused people to jizz in their pants with his bs promises,like about withdrawing the troops from the Middle East, and clearly that he was the 1st black american "able" to become president drew him more attention before and after the 2008 elections.

---------- Post added 2010-10-28 at 09:34 ----------

About 50% of whites voted for Obama, JEws only make up about 1% or 2% of the U.S. population.

Did Jews use mind control to make all those whites vote for Obama?

I'm sure that if they were interested in Obama winning then the media coverage about "CHANGE" more than made up for it,a pro-Obama anti-Bush(in sense that everything that could possibly go wrong in Obama's mandate was all Bush's fault anyway) movie was even shown on the national TV here(made by americans).

[saopinax]

If Obama wasn't black he wouldn't have even been the Democratic nominee. He wasn't even the favorite. Everyone thought Hillary would crush him and Edwards... until, of course, she didn't. The blacks and the young people came out in droves to push him ahead in the primaries.

Short memories around here.

In 2004, he was a Senate candidate and was given a keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention. Good speech, but what was most notable was his youth and skin color.

He then became the only black in the Senate.

That was 2004. For four years he was talked about as a future President/candidate for President without actually having done anything... because he was black, and gave a good speech.

So while his race wasn't the only thing by any means, what do you think "change" was about? He kept mentioning things like "I don't look like those people on the dollar bill" and how he has a funny name... it was painfully obvious that his race was being used to emphasize his being an agent of change.

[Chooriwrocaxz]

The overwhelming majority of people hated George Bush, therefore his party.

If such was the case then why did he get re-elected? I bet Bush would have won a third term if it was legal, he seemed very appreciated throughout the whole country except coastal places like California/Boston/New york etc.

---------- Post added 2010-10-28 at 09:25 ----------

It's possible, but it all depends on how much he would've been licking Jewish ass. He did suck it up to AIPAC quite well from what I can remember, and that's the main reason why the Jews approved him as president (it sure as hell wasn't the American people; i.e., whites).

All american presidential candidates hold speach infront of AIPAC during the most critical time of their campaigns, it's a compulsary ritual that all serious candidates must go through, and they also have to travel to Israel and kiss the wall.

[sonsayx]

The world was expecting more from Obama. He used to be named "the change", but he is not working well.

[Ygd2qr8k]

If such was the case then why did he get re-elected? I bet Bush would have won a third term if it was legal, he seemed very appreciated throughout the whole country except coastal places like California/Boston/New york etc.

---------- Post added 2010-10-28 at 09:25 ----------



All american presidential candidates hold speach infront of AIPAC during the most critical time of their campaigns, it's a compulsary ritual that all serious candidates must go through, and they also have to travel to Israel and kiss the wall.

That's utter nonsense.

How are you basing your argument about George Bush?

George Bush did not win a numerical majority his first election.

His second election he won Ohio, by less than 200,000 votes, which is nothing in a nation of 300 million. We are not one-man one vote...we have an electorial system that is dependent on state population.

Bush used this to his advantage.

Obama won a larger numerical majority than Bill Clinton!!

If Bush was so loved in America why would someone opposite him do so well, much better than him.

What you are saying is illogical.

As far as coastal populations.

Almost half of AMericans live there.

No one lives in Ohio. LOL

Ohio has as many people total as New York City and Trenton combined.

---------- Post added 2010-10-28 at 07:54 ----------

If Obama wasn't black he wouldn't have even been the Democratic nominee. He wasn't even the favorite. Everyone thought Hillary would crush him and Edwards... until, of course, she didn't. The blacks and the young people came out in droves to push him ahead in the primaries.

Short memories around here.

In 2004, he was a Senate candidate and was given a keynote speech at the Democratic National Convention. Good speech, but what was most notable was his youth and skin color.

He then became the only black in the Senate.

That was 2004. For four years he was talked about as a future President/candidate for President without actually having done anything... because he was black, and gave a good speech.

So while his race wasn't the only thing by any means, what do you think "change" was about? He kept mentioning things like "I don't look like those people on the dollar bill" and how he has a funny name... it was painfully obvious that his race was being used to emphasize his being an agent of change.

Hillary far more overtly used her gender, she directly appealed to women when she got desperate, DIRECTLY. Even started crying. LOL

Most women did support her in the end...BUT her support for women was like women over 40...most women under that went way for Obama. I don't know a single white women in the DC area who is under 40 who voted for Hillary during the primaries. White women were nuts for Obama. haha In the general, the vast majority of women went for Obama, I knew a lot turned off by Palin, especially in the cities. I knew Republican woemn who voted for Obama (there was significant cross over for Obama) mainly because they hated McCain or they hated him choosing Palin (who they often through was an idiot prop)...I think the main core audience for Palin was religious rural white women, who are not a majority of women, who would have voted Republican anyway. So they added nothing to McCain, but too boost his "religious right" vote, but that was not enough, most of them stayed home...he made too many enemies.

It's not a short memory, read my first post in this thread, I already said that here:

http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/sho...74&postcount=9

I work on the Obama Campaign in my area and followed stats very well since the first primary...i know exactly how things went down.

Obama had a strategy.

What he knew was he had to get blacks on his side in key states and rally young people, who usually don't show up, he did a war of attrition against Hillary. He knew he would not win the large states...he didn't need to.

He routed her. Brilliant strategy.