LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-03-2010, 11:14 PM   #21
zbckFNlW

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
I still consider Israel and the US as civilized countries. In both these countries, male circumcision is customary.
Male circumcision is not the same thing.

There is no scientific evidence it prevents men from enjoying sex or limits feeling, ability to orgasm, etc.


That is NOT TRUE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION. DO NOT CONFUSE THE TWO.
zbckFNlW is offline


Old 08-03-2010, 11:27 PM   #22
drycleden

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
Bravo ya Kurdim, I personally know a few euros who'd need this wonderful custom.
drycleden is offline


Old 08-05-2010, 09:57 PM   #23
KlaraNovikoffaZ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Location
USA
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
I still consider Israel and the US as civilized countries. In both these countries, male circumcision is customary.
The thought occurred to me this morning that circumsized males (Israelis, muslims and US soldiers) are disproportionately involved in armed mayhem.
KlaraNovikoffaZ is offline


Old 08-05-2010, 10:05 PM   #24
shieclulaweew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
Not to sound like even more of a Philippine fanboy than I actually am, but over 80% of Filipino men are circumcised, and they're overwhelmingly Catholic and a peaceful country. Even their revolution in the 1980s was essentially bloodless.

To say that there is a connection to having your foreskin removed and being violent is ridiculous. Very few Chinese or their jingoistic North Korean neighbors are circumcised, and look at them. By contrast, the vast majority of the pacifistic South Koreans are circumcised.
shieclulaweew is offline


Old 08-05-2010, 10:22 PM   #25
Babposa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
441
Senior Member
Default
The thought occurred to me this morning that circumsized males (Israelis, muslims and US soldiers) are disproportionately involved in armed mayhem.
Too bad, the Japs aren't circumcized.
Babposa is offline


Old 08-05-2010, 10:25 PM   #26
#[SoftAzerZx]

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
What is the reason for Catholics and Buddhists to circumsise?
#[SoftAzerZx] is offline


Old 08-05-2010, 10:26 PM   #27
NeroASERCH

Join Date
Jul 2006
Posts
5,147
Senior Member
Default
Not to sound like even more of a Philippine fanboy than I actually am, but over 80% of Filipino men are circumcised, and they're overwhelmingly Catholic and a peaceful country. Even their revolution in the 1980s was essentially bloodless.

To say that there is a connection to having your foreskin removed and being violent is ridiculous. Very few Chinese or their jingoistic North Korean neighbors are circumcised, and look at them. By contrast, the vast majority of the pacifistic South Koreans are circumcised.
Nazis weren't circumscribed. That's one way they identified Jews.
NeroASERCH is offline


Old 08-05-2010, 10:33 PM   #28
dodsCooggipsedebt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
What is the reason for Catholics and Buddhists to circumsise?
The Roman Catholic Church actually preached that ritual circumcision was a sin for many years starting in 1442, although they now claim to be neither for nor against it.

It's common in S. Korea and La Filipinas because those countries had high levels of American influence in the 20th century.
dodsCooggipsedebt is offline


Old 08-05-2010, 10:36 PM   #29
LSg44PDu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
What is the reason for Catholics and Buddhists to circumsise?
catholics don't cut. i dont know about buddhists. the origin of this is in hygiene. possibly the concept came during some plaque or something when people found out that it helps keep germs away. later, it was carried by customs and religion. its not natural thus questionable. i didn't know so many ethnicities practice it. one learns everyday.
LSg44PDu is offline


Old 08-05-2010, 10:38 PM   #30
namaikaimvputka

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
359
Senior Member
Default
catholics don't cut. i dont know about buddhists. the origin of this is in hygiene. possibly the concept came during some plaque or something when people found out that it helps keep germs away. later, it was carried by customs and religion. its not natural thus questionable. i didn't know so many ethnicities practice it. one learns everyday.
Most buddhist don't do that, maybe some sects, but not most Buddhist.
namaikaimvputka is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity