Reply to Thread New Thread |
11-03-2005, 07:00 AM | #1 |
|
PhilaVa NFL Power Rankings - Week 9
1. Indianapolis (8-0) - [8.5] - Next: HOU 2. Denver (6-2) - [19.3] - Next: @OAK 3. New York (6-2) - [19.8] - Next: MIN 4. Cincinnati (7-2) - [20.2] - Next: BYE 5. Seattle (6-2) - [25.3] - Next: STL 6. Dallas (5-3) - [27.8] - Next: @PHI 7. Jacksonville (5-3) - [27.8] - Next: BAL 8. Pittsburgh (6-2) - [28.3] - Next: CLE 9. Atlanta (6-2) - [32.2] - Next: GB 10. San Diego (5-4) - [33.0] - Next: BYE 11. Carolina (6-2) - [35.8] - Next: NYJ 12. Washington (5-3) - [40.5] - Next: @TB 13. Kansas City (5-3) - [42.5] - Next: @BUF 14. Chicago (5-3) - [43.0] - Next: SF 15. Tampa Bay (5-3) - [43.8] - Next: WAS 16. Philadelphia (4-4) - [46.8] - Next: DAL 17. Oakland (3-5) - [54.7] - Next: DEN 18. New England (4-4) - [57.3] - Next: @MIA 18. Miami (3-5) - [57.3] - Next: NE 20. Green Bay (1-7) - [59.0] - Next: @ATL 21. Detriot (3-5) - [59.8] - Next: ARI 22. St. Louis (4-4) - [61.3] - Next: @SEA 23. Baltimore (2-6) - [64.0] - Next: @JAX 24. Buffalo (3-5) - [64.2] - Next: KC 25. Cleveland (3-5) - [65.2] - Next: @PIT 26. Arizona (2-6) - [67.2] - Next: @DET 27. New York (2-6) - [70.8] - Next: @CAR 28. Minnesota (3-5) - [72.8] - Next: @NYG 29. Tennessee (2-7) - [73.3] - Next: BYE 30. New Orleans (2-7) - [80.3] - Next: BYE 30. San Francisco (2-6) - [81.0] - Next: @CHI 32. Houston (1-7) - [84.2] - Next: @IND |
|
11-06-2005, 07:00 AM | #2 |
|
Are you taking actual yards or rankings? because like I said last week passing yards mean nothing if you dont give up points. |
|
11-20-2005, 07:00 AM | #3 |
|
Yards ranking vs. the rest of the league, divided by three to negate how much it counts. Where are your rankings? |
|
11-20-2005, 07:00 AM | #4 |
|
|
|
12-20-2005, 07:00 AM | #5 |
|
|
|
01-07-2006, 07:00 AM | #7 |
|
|
|
01-08-2006, 07:00 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
04-27-2006, 07:00 AM | #9 |
|
|
|
06-28-2006, 07:00 AM | #10 |
|
How fucking funny would it be if the Texans won next week?!
If they had even a half-decent O-Line that team could have a couple more wins. Add to the fact that their GM is a moron (bad moves on D), and that their best defensive player (Kailee Wong) is out for the year, the Texans could be a good team. But regardess, they are 1-7....and it would be funny as hell if they won next week. |
|
08-06-2006, 07:00 AM | #11 |
|
PhilaVA what are ur criterion? My criterion using run and pass D (weighted for run D), turnovers, run and pass O (weighted for run O) plus bonuses for beating .500> teams and subtracted for losses to .500< teams show the Boys over the GMen. |
|
08-25-2006, 07:00 AM | #12 |
|
How fucking funny would it be if the Texans won next week?! However, I agree Casserly is a moron. Getting rid of Sharper and Glenn sold me on that. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|