LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-03-2005, 07:00 AM   #1
FredderiK

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
375
Senior Member
Default PhilaVa NFL Power Rankings | Week 9
PhilaVa NFL Power Rankings - Week 9

1. Indianapolis (8-0) - [8.5] - Next: HOU
2. Denver (6-2) - [19.3] - Next: @OAK
3. New York (6-2) - [19.8] - Next: MIN
4. Cincinnati (7-2) - [20.2] - Next: BYE
5. Seattle (6-2) - [25.3] - Next: STL
6. Dallas (5-3) - [27.8] - Next: @PHI
7. Jacksonville (5-3) - [27.8] - Next: BAL
8. Pittsburgh (6-2) - [28.3] - Next: CLE
9. Atlanta (6-2) - [32.2] - Next: GB
10. San Diego (5-4) - [33.0] - Next: BYE
11. Carolina (6-2) - [35.8] - Next: NYJ
12. Washington (5-3) - [40.5] - Next: @TB
13. Kansas City (5-3) - [42.5] - Next: @BUF
14. Chicago (5-3) - [43.0] - Next: SF
15. Tampa Bay (5-3) - [43.8] - Next: WAS
16. Philadelphia (4-4) - [46.8] - Next: DAL
17. Oakland (3-5) - [54.7] - Next: DEN
18. New England (4-4) - [57.3] - Next: @MIA
18. Miami (3-5) - [57.3] - Next: NE
20. Green Bay (1-7) - [59.0] - Next: @ATL
21. Detriot (3-5) - [59.8] - Next: ARI
22. St. Louis (4-4) - [61.3] - Next: @SEA
23. Baltimore (2-6) - [64.0] - Next: @JAX
24. Buffalo (3-5) - [64.2] - Next: KC
25. Cleveland (3-5) - [65.2] - Next: @PIT
26. Arizona (2-6) - [67.2] - Next: @DET
27. New York (2-6) - [70.8] - Next: @CAR
28. Minnesota (3-5) - [72.8] - Next: @NYG
29. Tennessee (2-7) - [73.3] - Next: BYE
30. New Orleans (2-7) - [80.3] - Next: BYE
30. San Francisco (2-6) - [81.0] - Next: @CHI
32. Houston (1-7) - [84.2] - Next: @IND
FredderiK is offline


Old 11-06-2005, 07:00 AM   #2
bs44MhUW

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
Are you taking actual yards or rankings? because like I said last week passing yards mean nothing if you dont give up points.

My scale is:

run D - .2
Pass D - .1
Points D - .2
Turnover - .1
Run O - .15
Pass O - .1
Points O - .15

Wins > .500 - (+).05
Losses < .500 (-).05
Yards ranking vs. the rest of the league, divided by three to negate how much it counts. Where are your rankings?
bs44MhUW is offline


Old 11-20-2005, 07:00 AM   #3
Ebjjrxrd

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
511
Senior Member
Default
Yards ranking vs. the rest of the league, divided by three to negate how much it counts. Where are your rankings?
Im at work I havent had the chance to run them through the spreadsheet tho i can't imagine that last nights game had much affect on the standings. I'll attempt to have them posted by 5 today.
Ebjjrxrd is offline


Old 11-20-2005, 07:00 AM   #4
derinasderun

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
Dunta Robinson is crying...

However, I agree Casserly is a moron. Getting rid of Sharper and Glenn sold me on that.
Robinson is definately good...but I'd give him another year before I put him up there...Wong is a terriffic pass rusher, and puts up Pro-Bowl type numbers.
derinasderun is offline


Old 12-20-2005, 07:00 AM   #5
huylibizonoff

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
572
Senior Member
Default
Feel sorry for Houston next week.
huylibizonoff is offline


Old 01-04-2006, 07:00 AM   #6
PekHyvac

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
Feel sorry for Houston next week.
There should be a nice point spread on that one.
PekHyvac is offline


Old 01-07-2006, 07:00 AM   #7
WapSaibiar

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
370
Senior Member
Default
PhilaVA what are ur criterion? My criterion using run and pass D (weighted for run D), turnovers, run and pass O (weighted for run O) plus bonuses for beating .500> teams and subtracted for losses to .500< teams show the Boys over the GMen.
WapSaibiar is offline


Old 01-08-2006, 07:00 AM   #8
pIp83Uns

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
Are you taking actual yards or rankings? because like I said last week passing yards mean nothing if you dont give up points.

My scale is:

run D - .2
Pass D - .1
Points D - .2
Turnover - .1
Run O - .15
Pass O - .1
Points O - .15

Wins > .500 - (+).05
Losses < .500 (-).05
pIp83Uns is offline


Old 04-27-2006, 07:00 AM   #9
Kneefrenolf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
366
Senior Member
Default
I have no problem with the Seahawks ranked 5th. We'll get a chance to move up when we host the Rams and Giants in our next two home games.
Kneefrenolf is offline


Old 06-28-2006, 07:00 AM   #10
njfeedd3w

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
How fucking funny would it be if the Texans won next week?!

If they had even a half-decent O-Line that team could have a couple more wins.

Add to the fact that their GM is a moron (bad moves on D), and that their best defensive player (Kailee Wong) is out for the year, the Texans could be a good team.

But regardess, they are 1-7....and it would be funny as hell if they won next week.
njfeedd3w is offline


Old 08-06-2006, 07:00 AM   #11
Angelinaaiiiiiiiii

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
383
Senior Member
Default
PhilaVA what are ur criterion? My criterion using run and pass D (weighted for run D), turnovers, run and pass O (weighted for run O) plus bonuses for beating .500> teams and subtracted for losses to .500< teams show the Boys over the GMen.
It's too long to get into, it takes in about 7-8 categories, points, yards, defense, turnovers.
Angelinaaiiiiiiiii is offline


Old 08-25-2006, 07:00 AM   #12
TorryJens

Join Date
Nov 2008
Posts
4,494
Senior Member
Default
How fucking funny would it be if the Texans won next week?!

If they had even a half-decent O-Line that team could have a couple more wins.

Add to the fact that their GM is a moron (bad moves on D), and that their best defensive player (Kailee Wong) is out for the year, the Texans could be a good team.

But regardess, they are 1-7....and it would be funny as hell if they won next week.
Dunta Robinson is crying...

However, I agree Casserly is a moron. Getting rid of Sharper and Glenn sold me on that.
TorryJens is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:05 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity