LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-22-2009, 02:11 AM   #1
XzBZB2UV

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default California Looking to ban Big Screen TVs.



Now that they have the other big problems solved?
XzBZB2UV is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 02:18 AM   #2
NarhozNic

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
370
Senior Member
Default
The article goes pretty in depth wrt the California EC's stupidity. This is waay too far out of line.
NarhozNic is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 04:15 AM   #3
fectsnanteemy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
The article goes pretty in depth wrt the California EC's stupidity. This is waay too far out of line.
I was surprised to read that Arnold supported the measure. Not sure if I trust the article, though, seeing as how it's from WorldNutDaily.
fectsnanteemy is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 04:56 AM   #4
AdobebePhoto

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
Wait, this is for real?
AdobebePhoto is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 05:02 AM   #5
masterboyz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
It's just making energy requirements stricter for TVs smaller than 58". It's a good thing because it kicks the manufacturer's ass into doing it, much as Energy Star has.



Just institute a pigouvian tax on energy consumption, for christ's sake.
masterboyz is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 05:14 AM   #6
Sydrothcoathy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default


Worth it just to see Asher's reaction.

Totally worth it.
Sydrothcoathy is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 05:43 AM   #7
durootrium

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
529
Senior Member
Default
Since 1975, the Golden State has led the nation in adopting tough energy standards for household appliances, homes and buildings. As a result, California's per-capita electricity consumption has remained flat for nearly three decades, while the rest of the country's power demand has grown 50%. Impressive. Think of the billlions saved in not wasting energy.
durootrium is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 06:04 AM   #8
Drugmachine

Join Date
Apr 2006
Posts
4,490
Senior Member
Default


Worth it just to see Asher's reaction.

Totally worth it.
That I called you a douche? When do I not?
Drugmachine is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 06:46 AM   #9
lE3l6Lgn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
From the sidewalk, presumably.
lE3l6Lgn is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 07:11 AM   #10
NvrNoNowX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
567
Senior Member
Default
You don't like a little smoke, stay home.
A bad was passed in Califonria after it was shown that bar maids had a high rate of lung cancer, even if they didn't smoke.

And Sloww, with your bum ticker, you should really give some thought to giving up the habit. We don't want you cashing in your chips early.
NvrNoNowX is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 07:21 AM   #11
VtLe67WR

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
Aren't you already 87 or something close?
VtLe67WR is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 08:41 AM   #12
kmjbbT3U

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
392
Senior Member
Default
Wind is going to **** electricity companies yet.
kmjbbT3U is offline


Old 09-22-2009, 04:50 PM   #13
Alkassyinhisk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Location
Thailand
Posts
459
Senior Member
Default
In Sloww's world energy companies don't produce their own energy, T. Boone Pickens does.
Alkassyinhisk is offline


Old 09-23-2009, 12:49 AM   #14
famosetroie

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
Sloww makes his own electricity and the electric companies pay him!
famosetroie is offline


Old 09-23-2009, 04:38 AM   #15
JesikaFclq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
428
Senior Member
Default
kinda ironic that the USA starts dealing with global warming by making TVs more efficient.
JesikaFclq is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 02:32 PM   #16
Dweplyododo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
Lol global warming is a lie
what the flying **** has energy consumption to do with global warming?
Dweplyododo is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 05:16 PM   #17
Foucceedo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
such as: china, india, africa

modern countries use nuclear
Foucceedo is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 05:29 PM   #18
scewLacysmazy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
Source of electricity in the USA (2006):

scewLacysmazy is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 05:32 PM   #19
Pinkman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
593
Senior Member
Default
the point is that global warming has, during the last 10 years, become a political tool to push pet issues of legislators. very few of the people who use the term understand what it means anymore, and very little of the political legislation pushed has anything to do with it.

ps: in case you haven't noticed it, you're becoming another oerdin
Pinkman is offline


Old 09-24-2009, 05:41 PM   #20
jPNy2BP5

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
You asked a stupid question debatable

displayed a fundamental misunderstanding of where energy comes from in the USA no

and got summarily educated. congrats for your mad wikipedia skillz, but california is very different from rest of the usa in it's energy use

also, the only result of CA (or whole US, or whole north america for that matter) using less coal is a lower price of coal, and thus china using more of coal in it's energy use thanks to laws of supply and demand. that's why none of this moralizing and government control has anything to do with global warming
jPNy2BP5 is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:54 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity