General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Originally posted by Krill
Then you are either lying about trolling or deluded. I don't think you are a double tard on the KH scale of tardness, but you are rating at least half tard level atm. Deluded?!?! ME! That's what they said when I wanted to mount Lenin's brain to a nuclear powered mega-doom tank and look who's laughing now!! In any case, I'm not seriously suggesting that eating all meat is more healthy (because of the base difference in composition), I was just hoping to provoke people into actually thinking about the issue. The modern food industry is a compromise between making food safer and making it cheaper. Who says the compromise side is closer to safety with greens than with meat? You offhandedly dismissed my claim, but think about it, if the animal in question was healthy, would you in fact consume less artificial additives if you ate a kg of meat than a kg of greens. Overall I quite agree that eating more greens than meat is healthy and better for the environment but perhaps the veggies in question aren't as healthy as you would like to think. Also half a tard on HK scale still makes me better off than 90% of humanity (I think he only considers himself to be at 0 tards) |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
All Humans are omnivorous, but not all omnivores are Human. No Humans are herbivorous and no herbivores are Human. No Humans are carnivorous and no carnivores are Human. Humans who choose to eat as herbivores are still omnivorous (no matter how much they whine and annoy the sh*t out of the rest of us) and Humans who choose to eat as carnivores are still omnivorous.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|