[Duaceanceksm]

Originally posted by CrONoS
But what I do know is the statistics in this paper are not good, and would never be accepted in a peer review. These statistics are from a book I can only asume you have never read, so what basis you would have to claim that they would not pass peer review, given that you most likely have never reviewed them?

All this article does is publicize the findings, and the article was not writen by the book's author.