General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Originally posted by FrostyBoy
It's a shame too Slowwhand, America did well for the past 100 years, but I guess its time for America to turn in its hat and start paying off its debts like the rest of us. Goodbye America, Welcome Back China. I don't know where to begin. Let's start at the beginning. Last 100 years? Turn in it's hat? Keep your filthy paws off the hat. Pay our debts? This point proves you're drunk. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Originally posted by Ninot
I could name atleast three I admire: Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Nixon I'd thrown in Grant, but he was less than admirable as a president, not by his own doing. Let's face it Roosevelt and Eisenhower would be thrown out of the modern Republican Party. Roosevelt thought big business was to powerful and moved to break up monopolies while he thought government could make life better for average people thus he started the FDA and several others. He'd get disowned for sure, and Eisenhower? He'd get smeared as a tax and spend liberal because he demanded equal opportunity, less military spending, HUGE increases in education, and actually spending money on American infrastructure. He's another one who better fits in with the modern Democratic platform then the Republican one. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Originally posted by Oerdin
Let's face it Roosevelt and Eisenhower would be thrown out of the modern Republican Party. Eisenhower? He'd get smeared as a tax and spend liberal because he demanded equal opportunity, less military spending, HUGE increases in education, and actually spending money on American infrastructure. He's another one who better fits in with the modern Democratic platform then the Republican one. Eisenhower originally sought the Democratic nomination, but the Democrats were too committed to Adlai Stevenson. The Republicans recognised the power of brand name immediately and scooped him up. There's no way the Republicans wouldn't do it all over again today. Turn down the man who liberated Europe? Please, get real. Platform is one thing, but power is where it's at. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|