LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-08-2008, 09:03 PM   #1
Czrzftmz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
380
Senior Member
Default Just in case the world didn't have enough people on it.
I thought you were going to tell us you were becoming a grandad.
Czrzftmz is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 09:28 PM   #2
fkjghfg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
Ok, I won't say who from Apolyton I thought the father would be.
fkjghfg is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 09:34 PM   #3
indartwm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
I'm fairly confident nobody from Apolyton has ever met his daughter... fairly ...
indartwm is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 09:37 PM   #4
LICraig

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
659
Senior Member
Default
I presume he met her pre-Apolyton... so he doesn't count Also, there are laws about that sort of thing...

and to DanS your DanS, the first sentence still applies.
LICraig is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 09:42 PM   #5
MightyMasc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by LordShiva


Pic? NO
NO
NO
NO
HELL NO.
MightyMasc is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 09:46 PM   #6
tobia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by rah


NO
NO
NO
NO
HELL NO.

Why not? It's not like she'll ever meet any of the OTF deviants fine citizens of the OTF.
tobia is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:01 PM   #7
enurihent

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
362
Senior Member
Default
You may need to explain the logic there Ben. I don't see how having IVF can lead to you having fewer children than none, but I may be missing something... so how does it lead to others having fewer children?
enurihent is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:08 PM   #8
SetSnonejog

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
623
Senior Member
Default
I'm sure the explanation will be enlightening.

and it was. (xpost)

and for those having problems with simple math.

1 > 0

1.0000000000001 > 1
SetSnonejog is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:09 PM   #9
myspacecoo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
I'm sure the explanation will be enlightening. I'm curious about yours. Where has IVF ever been shown to raise the birthrate?
myspacecoo is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:13 PM   #10
Q0KmoR8K

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
427
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by rah
I'm sure the explanation will be enlightening.

and it was. (xpost)

and for those having problems with simple math.

1 > 0

1.0000000000001 > 1 What about 0.999 repeating?
Q0KmoR8K is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:15 PM   #11
Grzqbmhy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
Simple math. If one couple is successful, the birthrate goes up. It may be .00000001 but it goes up.

But as always, my initial post didn't mention birthrate. It mentioned more children(people) which IVF will do.

You choose to argue birthrate for whatever reason.
And after realizing how silly your statement was that it decreased it, you changed your arguement again and focused on the other half. But it does increase the birthrate (however small) so what are you going to argue next.
Grzqbmhy is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:19 PM   #12
annouhMus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
621
Senior Member
Default
Ben Kenobi
annouhMus is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:30 PM   #13
extessarere

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
473
Senior Member
Default
I have to admit, I'm struggling with this one. You place greater emphasis on reproducing than marriage, and if enough people do this, the birth rate drops? It's all about the numbers. IVF is expensive.

Say you get married and have 2-3 kiddos.

Say you have IVF instead of getting married and have 1 kiddo.

This is how IVF can actually reduce the birthrate, especially in areas where the marriage rate is very high.
extessarere is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:44 PM   #14
BariGrootrego

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
BEN
Again, that's just plain silly. And more importantly it has nothing to do with the current discussion.

The article says using IVF for infertile women. They're not going to have ANY children without it, Married or not. GEEZE. AND they're talking about subsidizing it down to a couple of hundred dollars. Please read the material and discuss something pertinent.
BariGrootrego is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:48 PM   #15
BILBONDER

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
382
Senior Member
Default
Again, that's just plain silly. And more importantly it has nothing to do with the current discussion. Reread the article again. Where does it say that it is going to be restricted only to infertile married women? You are making assumptions.

The article says using IVF for infertile women. They're not going to have ANY children without it, Married or not. GEEZE. AND they're talking about subsidizing it down to a couple of hundred dollars. Please read the material and discuss something pertinent. I did. It is pertinent. The article says nothing about it being restricted to infertile people.
BILBONDER is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:54 PM   #16
toyboy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
374
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi


Reread the article again. Where does it say that it is going to be restricted only to infertile married women? You are making assumptions.



I did. It is pertinent. The article says nothing about it being restricted to infertile people. Ordinary Africans will just do it the natural way if that works out fine for them. Why would they pay for it, especially if they're very poor.
toyboy is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:56 PM   #17
ulnanVti

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
Why would you have IVF if you can have 2-3 kids without it? If you are a single woman? Your choices are to sleep with a guy that you really don't want to spend the rest of your life with, or wait for the guy and maybe not have kids at all.

Does marriage automatically make you fertile? Yeah, it does actually. You are more likely to have kids when you are married then if you are single.
ulnanVti is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 10:59 PM   #18
oneliRafmeene

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
409
Senior Member
Default
Ordinary Africans will just do it the natural way if that works out fine for them. Why would they pay for it, especially if they're very poor. The question you should be asking is why are they being burdened with a method that is both expensive and ineffective given superior alternatives.

Why is the west using more sexual imperialism to impose their ways on the rest of the world?
oneliRafmeene is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 11:02 PM   #19
8IhGpvH0

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
341
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi


The question you should be asking is why are they being burdened with a method that is both expensive and ineffective given superior alternatives.

Why is the west using more sexual imperialism to impose their ways on the rest of the world? They are being offered a cheaper alternative to what they have now, it's not like IVF is impossible in Africa. Just unaffordable.
8IhGpvH0 is offline


Old 07-08-2008, 11:06 PM   #20
zooworms

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
364
Senior Member
Default
They are being offered a cheaper alternative to what they have now, it's not like IVF is impossible in Africa. Just unaffordable. There are methods that don't cost anything.
zooworms is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity