End of Moussaoui trial may destroy Bush administration
 

You need a hobby, outside of witch hunting.

A Dec. '69 Settler? Wutang!

Originally posted by loinburger
A Dec. '69 Settler? Wutang!

Originally posted by loinburger
A Dec. '69 Settler? Wutang! Sorry dear sir, but this poster registered in Jan 1970, and is therefore a n00b http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...s/neeschud.gif

Originally posted by Bill3000
Um, it says Dec 69. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ies/tongue.gif The time displayed depends on your timezone.

Ooooh, so that's it http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ilies/idea.gif

It was a CIA plot! They had to blow up that section of the Penagon, because that's where they kept the parts left over from the alien autopsy. 9/11 wasn't a terrorist attack, it was an alien attack and they were demanding the return of their comrades!

http://www.eventis.ws/forums/images/...ot-tinfoil.gif

I wouldn't just outright dismiss his post as being looney.

There's more there than we are being told.

Wouldn't there be a way for you to post without asking a question ?

Flight 93 was actually shot down, the evidence is overwhelming.

http://911research.wtc7.net/material...3/flight93.pdf

http://www.gnn.tv/videos/62/UA_93_Th...to_Shanksville

Democracy beware, information will flow!

Before the crash, I hope.

Originally posted by Ted Striker
Yep, out of all the flights, 93 is the most mysterious


Details of exactly what happened are not clear Read pages 7 & 8: http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...e/1227842.html

Makes sense they shot down flight 93 before it could do major damage. The people on that plane couldnt be saved anyway but thousends on the gruond could.....

But even if the military shot it down it will never get out, same thing with Lee Harvey Oswald still officialy the only assasin of JFK http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ilies/wink.gif

my ignore list gets longer

Originally posted by snoopy369


Wait, you're saying our national security administration and spymaster folks don't tell us everything that there is to know? http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/eek.gif

I bet you're part of the same crowd that's upset that we found out the name of that spy married to the ambassador ... FIA http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...es/doitnow.gif You mean like the time we were told there was irrefutable proof of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? That we wouldn't be told for security reasons?

When it turned out there really wasn't any evidence at all?

And maybe that's why we didn't want to be told about it?

Cause it was a lie?

Originally posted by Slaughtermeyer
The least likely thing you would expect is passengers to rush the cockpit and crash the plane.

How in the world did he know in advance that would be the story? Even his own aide said, "The vice president was a little bit ahead of us". Well, barring the plane being shot down, the most likely other solution would be that the passengers took the plane down themselves rather than be used as a weapon. Unlike the president, Cheney is an exceptionally intelligent man. Many of us guessed the passangers had rebelled when we heard of the crash, and the Veep would be in the position to know whether the plane had been shot down.

As it turns out, the hijerkers crashed the plane rather than let the passengers take the plane back. But that doesn't mean an act of heroism didn't occur.

And even if the plane was shot down, so what? We knew it was hijacked. We knew that hijacked planes were being used as missiles. If it was shot down, then hurray for Cheney and Bush for making the hard call to do the right thing. http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif The vast majority of Amerians would support that call even now, and would have then. So I highly doubt that they hid that from us.

And besides, someone would have leaked something by now.

Now, I'm not saying that the media wouldn't have ignored it even if it had been leaked. After all, on stuff like the abuse at Abu Graib, the secret prisons, the wire tapping, etc. the main stream media has sat on that stuff for a year or longer. But even the "credible" alternative press isn't touching this, and we usually see this stuff months or even years before the MSM finally and begrudgingly mentions it in a one paragraph story below the fold on page 17.

How do you figure he's single?

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
[q=chegitz guevara]
And besides, someone would have leaked something by now.[/q]

This is the key. With everything under the sun being leaked under this adminstration to claim that this has been kept airtight borders on the absurd all by itself. Actually, one of the main players let the cat out of the bag in 2002, but nobody made any fuss or paid much attention. Larry Silverstein, owner of the twin towers and WTC 7 admitted that WTC 7 was "pulled" which is demolition industry slang for imploded. You can see and hear him make this confession 4 minutes into this video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-67143560548238...q=911+secret&pl=true