LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-02-2008, 04:31 PM   #1
anolbom

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default This day 65 years ago
anolbom is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 04:35 PM   #2
Markdogas

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
My grandfather was one of those defenders.
Markdogas is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 04:39 PM   #3
CiccoineFed

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Serb
My grandfather was one of those defenders. One of my German friends at this forum had a grandpa who lost his leg besieging this city or something
CiccoineFed is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 04:44 PM   #4
Broorbbub

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
610
Senior Member
Default
After Stalingrad all the population between Volga and Elbe lost their watches
Broorbbub is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 04:49 PM   #5
Riprincattiva

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
Too bad the siege didn't last another year or two. It may have changed post-war dynamics for the better.
Riprincattiva is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 04:58 PM   #6
Ayyfjicg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
432
Senior Member
Default
I kind of wonder how Stalin could accept a gift, even a token gift, from the King of England. I mean I understand that at the peace conference ending the war with Japan Stalin sent other people because he thought it would be unseemly for a communist leader to possibly talk to the Emperor of Japan.

I also understand Stalin and Churchill would often butt heads due to Stalin continually saying Churchill was a lackey for his imperialist masters.
Ayyfjicg is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 05:09 PM   #7
Vitoethiche

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
That's a cool sword.
Vitoethiche is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 05:31 PM   #8
zlZ95pjt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
376
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Elok
It's been a while since my HS history classes covered this...weren't the people of Stalingrad basically trapped like rats? I seem to recall the books saying that Stalin threatened to kill anyone who left the city in the face of the Nazis. So it wasn't that they were steel-hearted so much as they were more afraid of Stalin than they were of Nazi soldiers. Just what I read a while ago and never cared enough to confirm or debunk. BS. I'm not surprised though.
zlZ95pjt is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 05:40 PM   #9
VitaliyMurnov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Elok
It's been a while since my HS history classes covered this...weren't the people of Stalingrad basically trapped like rats? I seem to recall the books saying that Stalin threatened to kill anyone who left the city in the face of the Nazis. So it wasn't that they were steel-hearted so much as they were more afraid of Stalin than they were of Nazi soldiers. Just what I read a while ago and never cared enough to confirm or debunk. They had enough riffles to shoot all the deserters in the back with but not enough to give the soldiers at the front.
VitaliyMurnov is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 05:47 PM   #10
romalama

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
"I represent this scroll to the City of Stalingrad to commemorate our admiration for its gallant defenders whose courage, fortitude, and devotion during the siege of September 13, 1942 to January 31, 1943 will inspire forever the hearts of all free people."

Looks like Roosevelt was wrong. After just 65 years you call them rats.

****ers
romalama is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 05:54 PM   #11
Patabeamn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
WW2 leaders in the west were prepared to turn a blind eye to the evils of Stalin and the Soviet system in order to defeat Facism.

I have no need to turn a blind eye.
Patabeamn is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 05:56 PM   #12
NiliSpuppypax

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Serb
"I represent this scroll to the City of Stalingrad to commemorate our admiration for its gallant defenders whose courage, fortitude, and devotion during the siege of September 13, 1942 to January 31, 1943 will inspire forever the hearts of all free people."

Looks like Roosvelt was wrong. After just 65 years you call them rats.

****ers Not to take anything away from the people who fought there but I don't think that Roosevelt approved of Russian militarism despite that statement.
NiliSpuppypax is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 05:58 PM   #13
carfAball

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
599
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Wezil
Kid - Even if Sandman's premise was true... extra capacity would have been required to extend the siege. In the end I still see a defeated Germany and a much weaker Soviet. That's the point I was trying to make, that the German's needed more capacity (more land, people etc) to do anything further with their economy.
carfAball is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 06:01 PM   #14
Necedofer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
306
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Serb
Heresson, get out of this thread. I can't hear you anyway.
Necedofer is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 06:29 PM   #15
Licacivelip

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Where's the sword now?
Licacivelip is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 06:39 PM   #16
ultramDoctoo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Saras

Heroes of Stalingrad You mean "rats"?

Ты лучше меня не трогай сегодня, брателло. Я очень не люблю когда начинают осквернять память наших солдат, и особенно ненавижу людей, которые называют крысой моего деда, который кровь в Сталинграде проливал, и прошел через такой ад, который заокеанским гавнюками никогда и не снился.
ultramDoctoo is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 06:43 PM   #17
truttyMab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Location
Malawi
Posts
392
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Perfection
Where's the sword now? In the museum of the Stalingrad Battle, Volgograd City (former Stalingrad).
truttyMab is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 06:46 PM   #18
Zhgpavye

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
German production peaked in 1944, when they'd already lost a lot of land and resources. Notwithstanding, their armaments production was hobbled by not using women workers, being suspicious of mass production, having vast levels of duplication and a lack of interoperability.
Zhgpavye is offline


Old 02-02-2008, 06:50 PM   #19
galaktiusman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
"Enemy at teh Gates"



Rachel Weisz
galaktiusman is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:22 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity