After the Bamiyan Buddhas, Mohammedans target second-largest statue - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**Beatris** · 09-29-2007, 10:33 PM

That's Saracens for you.

**fygESytT** · 09-29-2007, 11:36 PM

A buddhist would say it is only rock and all things perish or get destroyed one time.

But of course it is interesting that one of the most militant religions of the world seems to preferably target relics of one of the most peaceful religions of the world.

**newspetty** · 09-30-2007, 12:26 AM

THE REAL story is that Christians are behind with them statues.

We need some megastructures NOW!

**KasaBalak** · 09-30-2007, 12:44 AM

The stupidity of those morons is beyond comprehension. If only they would use their religious zeal for positive things like understanding, peaceful cooperation or the good ole fashioned love...

tss

**Haftdrarp** · 09-30-2007, 01:34 AM

Yeah, that too.

**mosypeSom** · 09-30-2007, 02:37 AM

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Mohammedans? WTF? You want the people doing this to be called muslims?

**infinkPoode** · 09-30-2007, 08:05 PM

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Oh, wait, I have some chunky monkey in the freezer!

Be careful with that bush meat though, wouldnt want to start anothe pandemic.

**L6RLnyfl** · 09-30-2007, 08:08 PM

Originally posted by Proteus_MST
A buddhist would say it is only rock and all things perish or get destroyed one time.

But of course it is interesting that one of the most militant religions of the world seems to preferably target relics of one of the most peaceful religions of the world. Buddhists are the nerds of the religious world. It's no surprise that they are bullied.

**RooldpalApata** · 09-30-2007, 09:15 PM

Yes - check the link.

**sisimelanyk** · 09-30-2007, 09:36 PM

"Damaged".

Mohammedans.

Muslims.

Liberal Muslims (practically, apostates)

**CxofxJFm** · 10-01-2007, 01:47 PM

Originally posted by MarkG
thanks

where's the head?
You need to go ?

**Old-old-Ivy** · 10-01-2007, 04:21 PM

oh, and Mohammedans is considered offensive, because some believe it implies that muslims worship Muhammad. Me personally, I am not appaled by this term, because it is the same as Manicheans, Nestorians, Eutychians, Lutherans, Calvins, and many more religious group esp. of christian tradition named by their founder. But it'd be better not to use this term.

**Fiipolera** · 10-01-2007, 04:50 PM

Originally posted by Heresson
oh, and Mohammedans is considered offensive, because some believe it implies that muslims worship Muhammad. Me personally, I am not appaled by this term, because it is the same as Manicheans, Nestorians, Eutychians, Lutherans, Calvins, and many more religious group esp. of christian tradition named by their founder. But it'd be better not to use this term. Only a papist could come to this conclusion

**replrobin** · 10-01-2007, 11:11 PM

Originally posted by germanos

Only a papist could come to this conclusion

They really find the word mohammedan offensive, they think they are being called Mohammed worshippers.

Heresson is right

**repldoinfo** · 10-02-2007, 10:34 AM

09-29-2007, 10:33 PM	#1
Beatris Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 416 Senior Member	After the Bamiyan Buddhas, Mohammedans target second-largest statue That's Saracens for you. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-29-2007, 11:36 PM	#2
fygESytT Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 494 Senior Member	A buddhist would say it is only rock and all things perish or get destroyed one time. But of course it is interesting that one of the most militant religions of the world seems to preferably target relics of one of the most peaceful religions of the world. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-30-2007, 12:26 AM	#3
newspetty Join Date Dec 2005 Posts 501 Senior Member	THE REAL story is that Christians are behind with them statues. We need some megastructures NOW! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-30-2007, 12:44 AM	#4
KasaBalak Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 421 Senior Member	The stupidity of those morons is beyond comprehension. If only they would use their religious zeal for positive things like understanding, peaceful cooperation or the good ole fashioned love... tss Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-30-2007, 01:34 AM	#5
Haftdrarp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 427 Senior Member	Yeah, that too. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-30-2007, 02:37 AM	#6
mosypeSom Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 432 Senior Member	Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui Mohammedans? WTF? You want the people doing this to be called muslims? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-30-2007, 08:05 PM	#7
infinkPoode Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 406 Senior Member	Originally posted by chegitz guevara Oh, wait, I have some chunky monkey in the freezer! Be careful with that bush meat though, wouldnt want to start anothe pandemic. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-30-2007, 08:08 PM	#8
L6RLnyfl Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 405 Senior Member	Originally posted by Proteus_MST A buddhist would say it is only rock and all things perish or get destroyed one time. But of course it is interesting that one of the most militant religions of the world seems to preferably target relics of one of the most peaceful religions of the world. Buddhists are the nerds of the religious world. It's no surprise that they are bullied. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-30-2007, 09:15 PM	#9
RooldpalApata Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 461 Senior Member	Yes - check the link. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

09-30-2007, 09:36 PM	#10
sisimelanyk Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 484 Senior Member	"Damaged". Mohammedans. Muslims. Liberal Muslims (practically, apostates) Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-01-2007, 01:47 PM	#11
CxofxJFm Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 464 Senior Member	Originally posted by MarkG thanks where's the head? You need to go ? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-01-2007, 04:21 PM	#12
Old-old-Ivy Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 513 Senior Member	oh, and Mohammedans is considered offensive, because some believe it implies that muslims worship Muhammad. Me personally, I am not appaled by this term, because it is the same as Manicheans, Nestorians, Eutychians, Lutherans, Calvins, and many more religious group esp. of christian tradition named by their founder. But it'd be better not to use this term. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-01-2007, 04:50 PM	#13
Fiipolera Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 429 Senior Member	Originally posted by Heresson oh, and Mohammedans is considered offensive, because some believe it implies that muslims worship Muhammad. Me personally, I am not appaled by this term, because it is the same as Manicheans, Nestorians, Eutychians, Lutherans, Calvins, and many more religious group esp. of christian tradition named by their founder. But it'd be better not to use this term. Only a papist could come to this conclusion Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-01-2007, 11:11 PM	#14
replrobin Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 441 Senior Member	Originally posted by germanos Only a papist could come to this conclusion They really find the word mohammedan offensive, they think they are being called Mohammed worshippers. Heresson is right Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-02-2007, 10:34 AM	#15
repldoinfo Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 569 Senior Member	Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)