[Reocourgigiot]

UK. For gathering all scum of the earth in its territory.

[Fiesialenp]

You mean all the corrupt Russian oligarchs running away from Putin who are driving up London house prices and buying all our football teams?

[Senasivar]

North Korea by a mile/one of the Dear Leader's glorious footsteps.

[adultcomicssitedessaa]

Originally posted by MOBIUS
You mean all the corrupt Russian oligarchs running away from Putin who are driving up London house prices and buying all our football teams? Them too.

[Nothatspecial]

Originally posted by Ari Rahikkala
This poll about evil countries is dangerously incomplete Or are you just pissed off that I didn't mention finland?

[Qdkczrdi]

Iceland, for unleashing dangerous egg-headed oligarchs on London, buying up football teams and scaring the children.

[espenijij]

I voted China due to their plot to throw the earth out of orbit and all...

oh, and sucks what the Fantastic Four did to that big wall of theirs, I hope Stan Lee had to pay out the nose for the repairs!

[cmruloah]

Originally posted by Ecthy
The poll would have to be MC for me to put a vote Yeah, but if it was MC, you would hardly be voting for the most evil/dangerous now would you...

[Niobaralegra]

ph34r teh stealth nation technology

[orapope]

Canada... they're sneaky enough to not appear evil, but they ARE! THEY ARE!!!

[HRCPda7R]

You forgot Finland.

[c2siOlIk]

Originally posted by Kuciwalker
ph34r teh stealth nation technology That reminds me.

http://www.golemlabs.com/community/s...6&postcount=12

Why is the president of golemlabs cribbing my catchphrase? And without proper referencing too.

[bawayTeen]

Go Wales!

[Dndjzirw]

Teh UK. Just ask Mugabe.

Or just listen to the sound of it: uk uk uk UK! How can a country named like that not be eviller than an evil thing?

[Flalafuse]

I'm pretty sure when you multiply evil by danger, it can only be USA. There may be other countries which have more concentrated evil, but not so much potential Danger.

The danger of the USA is not just the nuclear stockpile and advanced military, but also in that they are sometimes seen as something of a rolemodel for the rest of the world. Thankfully Dubya has been doing his part to remedy that.

[datingcrew]

The USA is quite dangerous since the Iraq war, with their pree emptive wars thing now they can invade a country without a reason, and later say oops, we thought you had wmd

[oxinsnepe]

Originally posted by Barnabas
The USA is quite dangerous since the Iraq war, with their pree emptive wars thing now they can invade a country without a reason, and later say oops, we thought you had wmd they were dangerous starting with the Kosovo war, an unjust war to begin with. It got worse from there.

[PPActionnGuys]

Originally posted by Dis
I wouldn't say we are evil, but we most certainly are dangerous- at least to our enemies. To your allies too with your 'friendly fire'

[Flikemommoilt]

Originally posted by BlackCat


That is BS in the most pure form I've seen for long time - almost Mobby quality Well... it's basically the Bush doctrine, so he's not lying

The funny paradox of his doctrine is that pre-emptive strikes are pointless because at that point it is too late as the enemy already or will within a short period of time have nukes available, so preventive strikes must be done; but in that case the country doesn't have nuke potential so there's no pressing reason to invade them, so there's no legitimacy. And if there's no legitimacy, you alienate not only potential neutrals, but also allies (what is happening now )

Shows what a moron Bush has got to be if he bases his policy on this kind of rationale

Let alone the fact that because of this observation that preventive action will be taken, enemy states will be more prone to develop nukes rather than to stop it.

But even then the US is not the most dangerous, it's the global military-industrial complex that's been holding a tight grip for years since Eisenhower and the Korean War

[freeringtonesioo]

NK. It's not even close.