[Chiquita]

I believe the proper counterpoint (if we aren't being completely silly) is whether consent to sex suspends a man's right over his paycheck for the next 18 years .

Btw, as has been stated, copycat threads are not going to end well for your post count.

[MoreEndotte]

Copycat or not, this thread accurately lampoons the utter inanity of the original's premise.

[lollypop]

Aw, gee, the concept of being responsible for one's sperm...

Hey, if you don't want to run the risk, better beware of where you're putting it.

[YabbaIn]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
I believe the proper counterpoint (if we aren't being completely silly) is whether consent to sex suspends a man's right over his paycheck for the next 18 years . If we presume that paychecks are part of the man's body, you're right.

This counterpoint is forcing a man to do something he doesn't want to do to his body. The completely accurate would be forcing man not to do to his body something the society doesn't want him to do. But I can't think of any after-sex action male should not do or it would be painful , so I settled with a slighly flawed comparison over a perfect one.

[poekfpojoibien]

Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Aw, gee, the concept of being responsible for one's sperm...

Hey, if you don't want to run the risk, better beware of where you're putting it. Yep, that's the point. If you don't want to run the risk of pregnancy, better beware what you are putting into 'it'.

[Preegovesem]

it doesn't seem a particularly equitable solution for sperm-donor to say "sorry, not interested, it's all on you" and get away with it entirely

So give the woman all the power to decide simply because she does "most of the grunt work". How 'equitable' .

If the man says, "all on you", you do realize the woman can say "sorry, not interested" as well, right? It's called abortion.