[RafaelYV]

Randians don't have friends. They have expendable humans they can use to block the rocks others throw at them for being disciples of a psychotic money-grubbing she-ghoul.

[Wavgbtif]

Originally posted by Elok
Randians don't have friends. They have expendable humans they can use to block the rocks others throw at them for being disciples of a psychotic money-grubbing she-ghoul.

[alex_loudermilk]

Use this form to insult a group of people.
________ don't have friends. They have expendable humans they can use to block the rocks others throw at them for being disciples of a psychotic _________ ___-ghoul.

Ex:
Commie don't have friends. They have expendable humans they can use to block the rocks others throw at them for being disciples of a psychotic power-grubbing he-ghoul.

Christian don't have friends. They have expendable humans they can use to block the rocks others throw at them for being disciples of a psychotic hippie-grubbing he-ghoul.

p.s.: don't know what grubbing means... but anyway,,,

[f6HLLFcw]

Originally posted by Jon Miller
BTW, is Randism becoming more popular? If by Randism you mean Libertarianism, then I think that the answer to that is yes. In my experience, it is seriously competing with traditional conservatism (economically libertarian, socially traditionalist / authoritarian) amongst the young, right-leaning American.

[DavidShreder]

Originally posted by Jon Miller
To be honest, he is sort of a crap human being, but I like him anyways.

[weaddercaps]

Randism

I can't believe it took 12 posts.

[EsAllCams]

I dont think people should die because they dont have enough money for medicine or an expensive surgery, so I favour the sate giving free health care to everybody.

Libertarians think that would be avoided thru charity and donations, but it is bullshit for numerous reasons.

I think they are generally greedy and immoral.

[Nwxffgke]

Originally posted by Barnabas
I dont think people should die because they dont have enough money for medicine or an expensive surgery, so I favour the sate giving free health care to everybody.

Libertarians think that would be avoided thru charity and donations, but it is bullshit for numerous reasons.

I think they are generally greedy and immoral. By "they," I assume you mean objectivists/Randroids? My GF is Libertarian, and I think a lot of libs are like her: not immoral, just inclined to trust the government too little and businesspeople too much. I think it's a tad naive of her to think human society can exist without anyone in a position of genuine power, but I certainly wouldn't call her evil (as evidenced by my dating her). Objectivism, on the other hand...

[cabonuserollyo]

Originally posted by Japher
read Thomas More's "Utopia", Thomas Hobbes "Leviathon", Plato "Republic", Francis Bacon "New Atlantis"

all nice Yeah, not nice to live in. The Leviathan is all well and good until it's you that's being swallowed.

[CHEAPCIALISFORYOU]

This thread rocks... some awesome one liners here:

[q=Elok]Randians don't have friends. They have expendable humans they can use to block the rocks others throw at them for being disciples of a psychotic money-grubbing she-ghoul.[/q]

[q=Jon Miller]Well, yeah. He is my freind, I didn't say I was his.[/q]



[q=Jon Miller]To be honest, he (this freind) is sort of a crap human being, but I like him anyways.[/q]




More (by which I mean more one liners, not Sir Thomas More)

[Klissineopar]

Originally posted by korn469
How do libertarians propose dealing with corporations? I mean if the government almost faded away, Verizon, AT&T, and the cable companies would still own the internet connections to the majority of people's homes. It's not like some individual will have enough money saved up to suddenly build a competing fiber optic network to suddenly start competing with Verizon's FIOS. Large govts grow as the size of corporations grow.