[tomspoumn]

Originally posted by Provost Harrison
Well let us say if he never ate at KFC that week, he would have had $10.
If he had, he wouldn't have had $10 that week. But we don't have one piece of information to infer the other. Therefore none of them are correct. You see? For my conclusion I don't have to infer that at all, you're on the wrong track.
Read my posts again, I don't say "If he doesn't eat at KFC, he has more than $10". or anything similar.

I say, "If he has more than 10$ and eats at KFC, he doesn't contradict his statement." and "If he has more than 10$ and does not eat at KFC, he contradicts his statement." and "If he has less than $10, he can do what he wants because he never claimed anything about such a case."