LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-19-2007, 08:59 PM   #21
Cucoulkrory

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
557
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by DanS
AFAIK, false color only gets you so far. The Earth is more beautiful than anything you would paint. The goal is to put something in orbit that would replace an interstellar probe. You want full visual impact.

How big would a telescope need to be to replace an interstellar probe? Are we talking miles? Meters? AUs? What our brains perceive as color is just the assignment of a particular color to a range of EM Wavelengths. False color is just an artificial shift of the color to EM Wavelength range matching.

If we didn't tell you it was false color, how would you ever know the difference?
Cucoulkrory is offline


Old 02-19-2007, 09:27 PM   #22
Lkemybab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
That an unfair question, considering that we don't often see side-by-sides. We either see optical pictures of Earth or we see false color images of the stars. Do interplanetary probes use false color liberally?
Lkemybab is offline


Old 02-19-2007, 09:30 PM   #23
Inconykic

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
369
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by pchang
The problem is that working by hand in space is pretty tough. Last time I tried the spacesuit gloves, it was very hard for me to manipulate tools (compared to no gloves). Perhaps they have made advances in spacesuits since then. No, but they are making advances in habitat diameters. For instance, let's pretend that Bigelow Aerospace builds an inflatable habitat with suitable atmosphere (basically, a spacecraft dock). Piece together your mirror by hand. Depressurize the dock and launch.

Inflatable habitats give you maybe 1.5x or 1.7x the diameter of regular habitats. So let's say that a space dock launched on the Ares V would have a max diameter of 12 meters x 1.7 = 20 meters.
Inconykic is offline


Old 02-19-2007, 09:33 PM   #24
Pjayjukr

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by pchang
Once you get past Jupiter, its too dark to use real color. I must admit that some of the recent interplanetary probe images (Saturn?) have been pretty amazing.
Pjayjukr is offline


Old 02-19-2007, 09:51 PM   #25
DeedPatmeda

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
462
Senior Member
Default
ITYM, equivalent images to what a 100 meter telescope (i.e., 100 meters times 50,000) can take of Jupiter?
DeedPatmeda is offline


Old 02-19-2007, 10:02 PM   #26
BamSaitinypap

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by DanS
AFAIK, false color only gets you so far. The Earth is more beautiful than anything you would paint. The goal is to put something in orbit that would replace an interstellar probe. You want full visual impact.

How big would a telescope need to be to replace an interstellar probe? Are we talking miles? Meters? AUs? False color doesn't mean you have to "paint".
You can get beautiful pictures in false color.
BamSaitinypap is offline


Old 02-20-2007, 09:01 AM   #27
Wheegiabe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
I got out of grad school at MIT (aeronautics and astronautics) and started working as a government contractor. I never worked directly for NASA/JPL, but I was loaned out to them for several projects dealing with space sensors and modifying interstellar probes. I got disenchanted with working on government projects and went totally commercial. I am now a sales engineer. I sell expensive network/application appliances to large companies.
Wheegiabe is offline


Old 02-20-2007, 05:53 PM   #28
WXQMQFIr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
381
Senior Member
Default
If he's happier, it's worthwhile.
WXQMQFIr is offline


Old 02-20-2007, 09:58 PM   #29
ENGINESSQ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by pchang


I actually have to make the equipment work in the customer's environment. However, I get to rely on a high salary as well as juicy commissions to make it all worthwhile. That sounds a lot more interesting than the typical 'sales' position actually.
ENGINESSQ is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity