LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-19-2007, 07:05 AM   #21
Grzqbmhy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
401
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Zkribbler


Being Bush's foreign policy expert is like being Dr. Kavorkian's anaestisiologist.

Even I had to admit this was a good one.



Well done well played.
Grzqbmhy is offline


Old 01-19-2007, 07:09 PM   #22
Karensmith

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
573
Senior Member
Default
What it boils down to is that die-hard, anyone goes, democrats better get used to another republican run.
Karensmith is offline


Old 01-19-2007, 08:07 PM   #23
15Praxanant

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
I will not vote for Hillary.

If George W. Bush were running against Hillary in 2008, I'd vote for Dubya.
15Praxanant is offline


Old 01-19-2007, 10:36 PM   #24
aAaBecker

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
I think it's conclusive...Colin Powell will be our next President.
aAaBecker is offline


Old 01-19-2007, 11:06 PM   #25
rusculture

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
454
Senior Member
Default
Who would vote Republican at all? It's a dead party.
rusculture is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 04:10 AM   #26
Aeaefee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
Like this place is indicative of anything that matters.
Aeaefee is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 05:08 AM   #27
Zarekylin75

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
Would you like to make a wager?

Let me tell you ONE reason. Kerry, despite the loss of support from the VFW and American Legion, still got some veteran's votes. Veterans are a substantial lobby.
Hillary won't get what Kerry got.
Zarekylin75 is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 05:50 AM   #28
kertionderf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
No candidates are named. You're risking nothing that I'm not risking. Come on, Rufus. Let's gamble.

This will be an interesting one.
kertionderf is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 05:56 AM   #29
Sensbachtal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
509
Senior Member
Default
If Bill Clinton died tomorrow, how would it affect Hilary's chances?
Sensbachtal is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 06:11 AM   #30
saumemeva

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
The bet is, it doesn't matter who the republicans nominate, almost, if it's Hillary.

You take Hillary, I'll take the field of unknown republicans.
Hillary doesn't run, the bet is off.
saumemeva is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 06:22 AM   #31
Staillateno

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
Negatively overall, I would think. She'd get some grieving-widow sympathy, but Bill's greatest value would be on the stump, and she'd lose that. I agree, but would state it more strongly. She hasn't done **** herself, other than ride on hubby's back.
Staillateno is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 07:58 AM   #32
Loonakind

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
Ron Paul, he has announced - he has my vote for sure

I have mixed feelings about Tancredo, dont know enough about his other views and I'm sympathetic to getting alot more control of our borders especially if we're going to continue an insane foreign policy.

Hagel sounds rational, can see history repeating itself in his lifetime. Too bad he voted for the war...

Brownback is a fraud, uses religion to hide corruption.

Tommy Thompson is possible, I'd prefer his brother though

Bill Owens is an unknown, and I think he's right next door in Colorado.

Mike Huckabee, another neighbor I dont know much about other than he lost alot of weight and is pushing nutrition awareness.

Newt - morally bankrupt, cheats on cancer stricken wife and serves her with divorce papers while she's in the hospital.

I guess for me there is only 1 issue that matters, either we get our behinds out of the Middle East or we hang around pissing people off increasing the odds a city gets nuked. Now, I'm told, often by people who warned us of Saddam, that we invite the terrorists to attack us if we show weakness and "surrender", but what exactly are we surrendering? Some perceived moral claim to the oil under their feet and with it, the right to interfere by propping up dictators and knocking them down when it suits us?

Okay, why didn't Al Qaeda attack Russia after the Russians left Afghanistan?

The 2 Bush's and Clinton kept us in Saudi Arabia after Carter and Reagan helped religious fanatics expel the Russians from Afghanistan, and even as we got attacked here and abroad we stayed in Saudi Arabia. Umm...wasn't that why these guys were attacking the Russians in Afghanistan? Cuz they didn't want infidels occupying Muslim countries? Until we get a Prez who understands this, we're screwed. Well, maybe the occupants of Washington, DC or New York.

Oh my God, did I just use a mushroom cloud to add weight to my argument? Yikes!
Loonakind is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 02:14 PM   #33
Toivaluadiora

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
Vote for ANYONE BUT CLINTON


Paid for by Gamers who ****ing hate Hillary Clinton
Toivaluadiora is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 08:22 PM   #34
Misiotoagodia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
610
Senior Member
Default
[q=Berzerker]Ron Paul, he has announced - he has my vote for sure[/q]

Paul . Though I doubt he'll get anywhere in the primaries. If he's still around when Georgia's Primary comes around, I'll cast my vote for him.

Hagel sounds rational, can see history repeating itself in his lifetime. Too bad he voted for the war...

Though at the very least he saw his mistake.
Misiotoagodia is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 10:39 PM   #35
MasdMnPa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas enjoys a national reputation as the premier advocate for liberty in politics today. Dr. Paul is the leading spokesman in Washington for limited constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, and a return to sound monetary policies based on commodity-backed currency.

MasdMnPa is offline


Old 01-20-2007, 11:01 PM   #36
Mymnnarry

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
641
Senior Member
Default
I really, really hate them all. There is no one running who represents anything of what I want or feel.
Mymnnarry is offline


Old 01-21-2007, 12:46 AM   #37
esanamaserrn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
475
Senior Member
Default
There isn't enough gold in the world for the US to go back on the gold standard. Just like the UK couldn't get enough silver to once again make one pound stirling exchangable for one pound of sterling silver.
esanamaserrn is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity