LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-10-2006, 12:31 AM   #1
Ephejvll

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
472
Senior Member
Default Such smugness, arrogance ...such insufferable moral superiority.
Perhaps the most systemic problem with the report is it didn't tell us how to win; it answered how to get out. The commissioners answered the wrong question, but it was the one they wanted to answer. Leaving isn't a problem.
Ephejvll is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 12:35 AM   #2
usadatronourl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
"In all my time in Washington I've never seen such smugness, arrogance, or such insufferable moral superiority. Self-congratulatory. Full of itself. Horrible"

OKAAAAY.......this dude must've had his hands over his eyes, his ears stuffed with cotton, noseplugs in, and suffering from the worst case of cranialrectal impaction I've seen in YEARS if the Baker commission report was the smuggest thing he's seen in Washington....
usadatronourl is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 12:45 AM   #3
sniskelsowwef

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default
Who could that be?
sniskelsowwef is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 12:50 AM   #4
pouslytut

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Dauphin
Maybe we need a poll......
pouslytut is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 01:20 AM   #5
FelixQY

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
601
Senior Member
Default
The report mirrors the sentiment of the American public, so evidently Bill Bennett considers us smug, arrogant and insufferably morally superior. Furthermore most of us haven't been ouitside of the Green Zone. Maybe what Bill Bennett wants for America is something akin to the government of Starship Troopers.
FelixQY is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 02:01 AM   #6
tramadoldiscountes

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
From the thread title, I thought this was going to be about Ned admitting to his own serious flaws.
tramadoldiscountes is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 02:38 AM   #7
18holesin

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
580
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by loinburger

" Nuke it from orbit!" HEY! That's illegal! You'll get in trouble with the U.N.!
18holesin is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 04:36 AM   #8
megatrendsZ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Holy crap, you mean this is the book of virtues guy? Geez, I thought I recognized the name, but said "nah, it couldn't be..."
megatrendsZ is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 02:33 PM   #9
zoolissentesy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
484
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by MRT144
asher, agathon, krazyhorse? You forgot your mate Molly.
zoolissentesy is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 03:37 PM   #10
FuXA8nQM

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
Israel's got nothing to do with this. They don't get a vote.
FuXA8nQM is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 03:48 PM   #11
Avoireeideree

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
The Right is eating it's own...
Avoireeideree is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 09:49 PM   #12
FjFHQLJQ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
Oh, come now. The charge of the Light Brigade was a terrible tactical decision that got hundreds of good men killed. The war in Iraq is a terrible strategic decision that's gotten thousands of good men killed not including Iraqi civilians. Now get some perspective and stop demeaning Lord Cardigan with your melodrama!

EDIT: Quick research on Wikipedia reveals that, in addition, the LB charged into that valley based on misunderstood orders; their CO was ordering them to charge a different target which was visible to him but not to them. Whereas the Iraq war was executed exactly as planned, and went wrong because it was planned by an idiot and his yes-man toadies.
FjFHQLJQ is offline


Old 12-10-2006, 10:06 PM   #13
ycMC0PLg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
OT: Elok - who's the guy in your avatar? It reminds me of Will9's old one.
ycMC0PLg is offline


Old 12-11-2006, 01:23 AM   #14
Zdmlscid

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
384
Senior Member
Default
Z, the only difference between the left and the right on the Iraq report is that the left thinks we have already been defeated while the right thinks victory is still possible. In both cases, both sides agree that the Report calls for surrender.
Zdmlscid is offline


Old 12-11-2006, 05:01 AM   #15
11Pecepebra

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Ned
Z, the only difference between the left and the right on the Iraq report is that the left thinks we have already been defeated while the right thinks victory is still possible. In both cases, both sides agree that the Report calls for surrender. Wrong.

Both sides realize that the report acknowledges:

1) Military victory, on the terms that the Bush administration has been defining it, is now impossible; and
2) in the face of that, it's time to think about an exit strategy.

The left applauds these findings, to some extent, because they are a long-overdue recognition of reality. The right has gone ballistic over these findings because it means they are wrong, and have been wrong for years -- and the blood of thousands of Americans and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis are on their hands.

And everyone, left center and right, condemns the report for being too chicksh!t to offer clear steps toward its goal.
11Pecepebra is offline


Old 12-11-2006, 06:27 AM   #16
c2siOlIk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
And then in that case, sometimes surrender can be good. Better to live to fight again another day than be exterminated .
c2siOlIk is offline


Old 12-11-2006, 06:56 AM   #17
avaiftBoara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
We also had ~47,000 more soldiers killed. Then again, America was a lot tougher back then...
avaiftBoara is offline


Old 12-11-2006, 08:05 AM   #18
Plaumpholavup

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
Originally posted by Cort Haus


You forgot your mate Molly.
Plaumpholavup is offline


Old 12-11-2006, 08:22 AM   #19
angeldimmon

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
358
Senior Member
Default
Add the Washington Post to the increasingly long list of critics of the ISG report.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...120900581.html
angeldimmon is offline


Old 12-11-2006, 09:30 AM   #20
GillTeepbew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
416
Senior Member
Default
Using your numbers, there's still a 376% difference in the number killed in Korea per deployed soldier vs the number killed in Iraq per deployed soldier. And a 71% difference in total casualties per deployed soldier.

edit: To put that in perspective, we would now have over 14,000 dead and around 28,500 wounded in Iraq at Korean War casualty/deployed soldier rates.
GillTeepbew is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity