General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Upper castes are usually fairer-skinned. The most extreme example is the Chitpavan Brahmins of Maharashtra - they don't look Indian, they look white. Is this a post colonial british heritage thing a modern skin bleaching fad (Michael Jackson
![]() EDIT: cross posted with Oderin and seems its the later guess in his opinion |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
Interesting, I'm wondering how this came about as you would think that at one point everyone was more homoginous. Given the Indian caste system its concivable that a selective preshure for fair skin could have over the centuries resulted in a significant genetic difference in the different castes.
This also reminds me of another interesting thing I had read. For most societies up untill the industrial revolution fair skin was considered desirable because the lower classes were taned by their work in the fields. Only the upper class stayed in doors enough to become pasty. Cosmetics were typicaly used to lighten the skin. Post industrial revolution the typical person works in a factory and gets little sun, now only thouse with sufficient leashure time get a nice tan particularly on their vacations to equitorial climates and the whole trend is reversed as tanning becomes a status symbol. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|