[popandopulus]

I have read about half this book. It is huge.

[uaodnabnjz]

for more, read the revolutionary catechism by sergey nechayev from 1869. its short, to the point and you will understand how jews can justify their sociopathic mind. its free on marxists.org

[uaodnabnjz]

i cant believe there are so few comments on this foundational topic. Its the impetus behind the protocols......and the fount from which all revolutions have their origin. ( i am refering to nechayevs work.) i wish someone would cut and paste it as im still comp illiterate.

[popandopulus]

Catechism of a Revolutionary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
It has been suggested that this article be split into multiple articles accessible from a disambiguation page. (May 2012) Russian revolutionary Mikhail Bakunin (1814-1876) (left) and anarchist and nihilist revolutionary Sergey Nechayev (1847–1882). (right)

The Revolutionary Catechism or Catechism of a Revolutionary refers to two documents:

• a manifesto written by a Russian anarchist Mikhail Bakunin in 1865–1866;[1]
• a manifesto written by Russian revolutionary Sergey Nechayev between April and August 1869.

The first document, better known as The Revolutionary Catechism, is a manifesto of anarchism, opposing religion and the state, advocating the
“ absolute rejection of every authority including that which sacrifices freedom for the convenience of the state.[1] ” The second document, better known as Catechism of a Revolutionary, is an authoritarian manual for the formation of secret societies.
For the second document it is debated how much input Bakunin had or if it is solely the work of Nechayev. The work called for total devotion to a revolutionary lifestyle.[2] Its publication in the Government Herald in July 1871 as the manifesto of the Narodnaya Rasprava secret society was one of the most dramatic events of Nechayev's revolutionary life,[3][4][5] through its words and the actions it inspired establishing Nechayev's importance for the Nihilist movement.[6] The Catechism is divided into two sections; General Rules of the Organisation and Rules of Conduct of Revolutionaries, 22 and 26 paragraphs long respectively;[4] abridged versions were published as excerpts in the anarchist periodicals Freiheit and The Alarm.[7]
The most radical document of its age,[8] the Catechism outlined the authors' revolutionary Jacobin program of organisation and discipline, a program that became the backbone of the radical movement in Russia. The revolutionary is portrayed in the Catechism as an amoral avenging angel, an expendable resource in the service of the revolution,[6] committed to any crime or treachery necessary to effect the downfall of the prevailing order.[4]
The revolutionary is a doomed man. He has no private interests, no affairs, sentiments, ties, property nor even a name of his own. His entire being is devoured by one purpose, one thought, one passion - the revolution. Heart and soul, not merely by word but by deed, he has severed every link with the social order and with the entire civilized world; with the laws, good manners, conventions, and morality of that world. He is its merciless enemy and continues to inhabit it with only one purpose - to destroy it. –
—Catechism of a Revolutionary, opening lines.[7]Critics of anarchism cite the Catechism as the most notorious document in what they take to be the anarchist tradition, arguing that it reflects the innately violent and nihilistic nature of the philosophy.[9] Scholar Michael Allen Gillespie has hailed the Catechism as "a pre-eminent expression of the doctrine of freedom and negation" that arose in the Fichtean notion of the "Absolute I" that had been concealed in Left Hegelianism.[6] Prominent Black Panther of the 20th century Eldridge Cleaver adopted the Catechism as a "revolutionary bible", incorporating it into his daily life to the extent that he employed, in his words, "tactics of ruthlessness in my dealings with everyone with whom I came into contact".[10] The ideas and sentiments in the work had been in part previously aired by Zaichnevsky and Nikolai Ishutin in Russia, and by Carbonari and Young Italy in the West.[11]
The journal "Cahiers du monde russe et soviétique" published a letter from Bakinin to Nechaev, in which Bakinin particularly wrote:
“ Your remember how you were angry with me, when I called you abrek and called your Catechism the Catechism of abreks.[12] ” See also

• Anarchism and violence
• Professional revolutionaries
• The Possessed, an 1872 novel by Fyodor Dostoevsky influenced by the events surrounding the publication of the Catechism.
• Fight Club (novel), outlines the parallel revolutionary philosophy and practice of Tyler Durden.

Footnotes

• ^ a b Revolutionary Catechism, Mikhail Bakunin, 1866, Bakunin on Anarchy, translated and edited by Sam Dolgoff, 1971.
• ^ Wesson, Robert (1978). Lenin's Legacy. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University. pp. 9. ISBN 0-8179-6922-5.
• ^ Heller, Mikhail (1988). Cogs in the Wheel. New York: Knopf. pp. 12. ISBN 0-394-56926-1. "The Catechism of a Revolutionary, a chilling blueprint for the ideal "New Man," was the manifesto of a secret society called The People's Revenge (Narodnaya Rasprava)..."
• ^ a b c Avrich p.38
• ^ Crenshaw, Martha (1995). Terrorism in Context. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 72. ISBN 0-271-01015-0.
• ^ a b c Gillespie, Michael (1995). Nihilism before Nietzsche. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 162–163. ISBN 0-226-29347-5.
• ^ a b Avrich, Paul (1986). The Haymarket Tragedy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 171. ISBN 0-691-00600-8.
• ^ Moser, Charles (1992). The Cambridge History of Russian Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 265. ISBN 0-521-42567-0.
• ^ Mclaughlin, Paul (2007). Anarchism and Authority. Aldershot: Ashgate. pp. 7. ISBN 0-7546-6196-2.
• ^ Avrich p.13
• ^ Avrich, p.37
• ^ Michaël Confino Bakunin et Nečaev Cahiers du monde russe et soviétique Année 1966 Volume 7 Numéro 7-4 pp. 581–699

References

• Avrich, Paul (1990). Anarchist Portraits. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-00609-1.

External links

• Revolutionary Catechism, Mikhail Bakunin, 1866, Bakunin on Anarchy, translated and edited by Sam Dolgoff, 1971.
• Catechism of a Revolutionary at the Spunk Library

[StizePypemype]

Tom is awesome, I've met him several times. He's also Croatian.

[Finkevannon]

Thanks for the thread John, thanks for picking up the slack too, .

The OP goes places, haven't looked at it in full but very similar to a lot of material out there.

Satan was a rebel, this leads to what some Rabbi's and some Jews have claimed that Satan is their god.
Whether they believe that as a story/allegory or they really believe that, they don't believe they are evil, just rebels, " Rabbi's argue with GOD and win " .

Don't forget the Masons too, the Occult, early Gnostics, Blat Witch,
we are talking about the same thing.

We go back in time, to 2002, after many of my threads and posts, the conclusion.
It's the Jews, Stupid!!!

LONG LIVE ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiochus_IV_Epiphanes

Edit Add, on Agora, this is related, we had a thread/links on why the Jews never created anything,
including Writing, Literature, many people do not understand that this is true, they make
assumptions, they were not allowed to write, to create, to be educated, they are against
all who did going back to Classical times, and this is what the previous link is directly about,
they only knew how to secretly organize and decontruct the very societies they leached off of.
Another example, they destroyed Alexandria, been reading about this recently, rioting, somehow corrupting the Romans to the point of being exempt from taxes, they burned the city down and most likely attempted to burn down the Library many times, the Greeks did not do this to themselves.
Hence the Greeks knew who they were, and the Romans later, HENCE.
Eustace Mullins: NEW HISTORY OF THE JEWS

Another modern example.
What is " jewish art " , what does it mean ? They are mocking the creators operating as denigrators/destroyers !

Another modern example, I believe the old Architecture in Europe was deliberately destroyed
by Jewry during WWII, just as they destroy archeological sites today in Israel, Iraq, Libya,
supporting the Taliban doing this, etc, etc, destroy your enemies history and culture, creations.
All of this is documented, the only question is it deliberate, Yes !

[uaodnabnjz]

The Revolutionary Catechism

Source: Russian Anarchism.
Sergey Genadievich Nechayev was a man so feared by the Czar and the aristocrat, ruling classes, he became the Czar’s special prisoner. The Czar received weekly special reports on Nechayev’s prison activities.
Nechayev was born September 20, 1847. He died at age 35 in prison, on December 3, 1882 – from dropsy complicated by scurvy.
He was convicted for the murder of a fellow student, but his real crimes were political. He frightened the state because he claimed to head a secret society four million strong. In truth, it was a small group, maybe a few hundred, mainly of St. Petersburg students. The trial sentenced him to 20 years in Siberia. The Czar intervened and ordered him to be retained for the rest of his life. He was kept in Cell #1 of the notorious Alexis Ravelin of the Peter and Paul Fortress.
As a human being, he left much to be desired – he lied, cheated, blackmailed, murdered. Of course, he would defend his actions based on the principles laid out in the following document. Regardless his personal attributes, he rejected the authority of the state to his dismal end and, for that, gained legendary status in Russia.
The Narodnaya Volya (People’s Freedom) considered using its resources to free him rather than kill the Czar – an offer he rejected, saying the death of the Czar was more important. (And, indeed, on March 13, 1881, Czar Alexander II was assassinated whilst riding through the snowy streets of St. Petersburg.)
Dostoyevsky used Nechayev as the inspiration for his novel, The Possessed. Nechayev wrote quite a few pamphlets on revolutionary topics. Probably the most famous and lasting is The Revolutionary Catechism.
The Duties of the Revolutionary toward Himself

1. The revolutionary is a doomed man. He has no personal interests, no business affairs, no emotions, no attachments, no property, and no name. Everything in him is wholly absorbed in the single thought and the single passion for revolution.
2. The revolutionary knows that in the very depths of his being, not only in words but also in deeds, he has broken all the bonds which tie him to the social order and the civilized world with all its laws, moralities, and customs, and with all its generally accepted conventions. He is their implacable enemy, and if he continues to live with them it is only in order to destroy them more speedily.
3. The revolutionary despises all doctrines and refuses to accept the mundane sciences, leaving them for future generations. He knows only one science: the science of destruction. For this reason, but only for this reason, he will study mechanics, physics, chemistry, and perhaps medicine. But all day and all night he studies the vital science of human beings, their characteristics and circumstances, and all the phenomena of the present social order. The object is perpetually the same: the surest and quickest way of destroying the whole filthy order.
4. The revolutionary despises public opinion. He despises and hates the existing social morality in all its manifestations. For him, morality is everything which contributes to the triumph of the revolution. Immoral and criminal is everything that stands in its way.
5. The revolutionary is a dedicated man, merciless toward the State and toward the educated classes; and he can expect no mercy from them. Between him and them there exists, declared or concealed, a relentless and irreconcilable war to the death. He must accustom himself to torture.
6. Tyrannical toward himself, he must be tyrannical toward others. All the gentle and enervating sentiments of kinship, love, friendship, gratitude, and even honor, must be suppressed in him and give place to the cold and single-minded passion for revolution. For him, there exists only one pleasure, on consolation, one reward, one satisfaction – the success of the revolution. Night and day he must have but one thought, one aim – merciless destruction. Striving cold-bloodedly and indefatigably toward this end, he must be prepared to destroy himself and to destroy with his own hands everything that stands in the path of the revolution.
7. The nature of the true revolutionary excludes all sentimentality, romanticism, infatuation, and exaltation. All private hatred and revenge must also be excluded. Revolutionary passion, practiced at every moment of the day until it becomes a habit, is to be employed with cold calculation. At all times, and in all places, the revolutionary must obey not his personal impulses, but only those which serve the cause of the revolution.
The Relations of the Revolutionary toward his Comrades

8. The revolutionary can have no friendship or attachment, except for those who have proved by their actions that they, like him, are dedicated to revolution. The degree of friendship, devotion and obligation toward such a comrade is determined solely by the degree of his usefulness to the cause of total revolutionary destruction.
9. It is superfluous to speak of solidarity among revolutionaries. The whole strength of revolutionary work lies in this. Comrades who possess the same revolutionary passion and understanding should, as much as possible, deliberate all important matters together and come to unanimous conclusions. When the plan is finally decided upon, then the revolutionary must rely solely on himself. In carrying out acts of destruction, each one should act alone, never running to another for advice and assistance, except when these are necessary for the furtherance of the plan.
10. All revolutionaries should have under them second- or third-degree revolutionaries – i.e., comrades who are not completely initiated. these should be regarded as part of the common revolutionary capital placed at his disposal. This capital should, of course, be spent as economically as possible in order to derive from it the greatest possible profit. The real revolutionary should regard himself as capital consecrated to the triumph of the revolution; however, he may not personally and alone dispose of that capital without the unanimous consent of the fully initiated comrades.
11. When a comrade is in danger and the question arises whether he should be saved or not saved, the decision must not be arrived at on the basis of sentiment, but solely in the interests of the revolutionary cause. Therefore, it is necessary to weigh carefully the usefulness of the comrade against the expenditure of revolutionary forces necessary to save him, and the decision must be made accordingly.
The Relations of the Revolutionary toward Society

12. The new member, having given proof of his loyalty not by words but by deeds, can be received into the society only by the unanimous agreement of all the members.
13. The revolutionary enters the world of the State, of the privileged classes, of the so-called civilization, and he lives in this world only for the purpose of bringing about its speedy and total destruction. He is not a revolutionary if he has any sympathy for this world. He should not hesitate to destroy any position, any place, or any man in this world. He must hate everyone and everything in it with an equal hatred. All the worse for him if he has any relations with parents, friends, or lovers; he is no longer a revolutionary if he is swayed by these relationships.
14. Aiming at implacable revolution, the revolutionary may and frequently must live within society will pretending to be completely different from what he really is, for he must penetrate everywhere, into all the higher and middle-classes, into the houses of commerce, the churches, and the palaces of the aristocracy, and into the worlds of the bureaucracy and literature and the military, and also into the Third Division and the Winter Palace of the Czar.
15. This filthy social order can be split up into several categories. The first category comprises those who must be condemned to death without delay. Comrades should compile a list of those to be condemned according to the relative gravity of their crimes; and the executions should be carried out according to the prepared order.
16. When a list of those who are condemned is made, and the order of execution is prepared, no private sense of outrage should be considered, nor is it necessary to pay attention to the hatred provoked by these people among the comrades or the people. Hatred and the sense of outrage may even be useful insofar as they incite the masses to revolt. It is necessary to be guided only by the relative usefulness of these executions for the sake of revolution. Above all, those who are especially inimical to the revolutionary organization must be destroyed; their violent and sudden deaths will produce the utmost panic in the government, depriving it of its will to action by removing the cleverest and most energetic supporters.
17. The second group comprises those who will be spared for the time being in order that, by a series of monstrous acts, they may drive the people into inevitable revolt.
18. The third category consists of a great many brutes in high positions, distinguished neither by their cleverness nor their energy, while enjoying riches, influence, power, and high positions by virtue of their rank. These must be exploited in every possible way; they must be implicated and embroiled in our affairs, their dirty secrets must be ferreted out, and they must be transformed into slaves. Their power, influence, and connections, their wealth and their energy, will form an inexhaustible treasure and a precious help in all our undertakings.
19. The fourth category comprises ambitious office-holders and liberals of various shades of opinion. The revolutionary must pretend to collaborate with them, blindly following them, while at the same time, prying out their secrets until they are completely in his power. They must be so compromised that there is no way out for them, and then they can be used to create disorder in the State.
20. The fifth category consists of those doctrinaires, conspirators, and revolutionists who cut a great figure on paper or in their cliques. They must be constantly driven on to make compromising declarations: as a result, the majority of them will be destroyed, while a minority will become genuine revolutionaries.
21. The sixth category is especially important: women. They can be divided into three main groups. First, those frivolous, thoughtless, and vapid women, whom we shall use as we use the third and fourth category of men. Second, women who are ardent, capable, and devoted, but whom do not belong to us because they have not yet achieved a passionless and austere revolutionary understanding; these must be used like the men of the fifth category. Finally, there are the women who are completely on our side – i.e., those who are wholly dedicated and who have accepted our program in its entirety. We should regard these women as the most valuable or our treasures; without their help, we would never succeed.
The Attitude of the Society toward the People

22. The Society has no aim other than the complete liberation and happiness of the masses – i.e., of the people who live by manual labor. Convinced that their emancipation and the achievement of this happiness can only come about as a result of an all-destroying popular revolt, the Society will use all its resources and energy toward increasing and intensifying the evils and miseries of the people until at last their patience is exhausted and they are driven to a general uprising.
23. By a revolution, the Society does not mean an orderly revolt according to the classic western model – a revolt which always stops short of attacking the rights of property and the traditional social systems of so-called civilization and morality. Until now, such a revolution has always limited itself to the overthrow of one political form in order to replace it by another, thereby attempting to bring about a so-called revolutionary state. The only form of revolution beneficial to the people is one which destroys the entire State to the roots and exterminated all the state traditions, institutions, and classes in Russia.
24. With this end in view, the Society therefore refuses to impose any new organization from above. Any future organization will doubtless work its way through the movement and life of the people; but this is a matter for future generations to decide. Our task is terrible, total, universal, and merciless destruction.
25. Therefore, in drawing closer to the people, we must above all make common cause with those elements of the masses which, since the foundation of the state of Muscovy, have never ceased to protest, not only in words but in deeds, against everything directly or indirectly connected with the state: against the nobility, the bureaucracy, the clergy, the traders, and the parasitic kulaks. We must unite with the adventurous tribes of brigands, who are the only genuine revolutionaries in Russia.
26. To weld the people into one single unconquerable and all-destructive force – this is our aim, our conspiracy, and our task.
This is the spirit in which they destroyed Christian Russia, and turned it into a Godless sh!thole....marvel not that the unrepentant tribe is destroying our beloved country with the same perverted zeal.

[uaodnabnjz]

bump....

[MicoSiru]

If you look at the early history of the Khazars, you will note that they were mercenaries who rented themselves out to their neighbors. They used this to strategic advantage of their own nation. They learned to play one neighbor against the other, killing off their neighbors leaving a void for them to fill, a task they prepared for well in advance. This of course grew into a pattern of fomenting political upheavals worldwide from which they could benefit.

As we have all learned from Wall Street, foreknowledge is of paramount importance. If we know what will probably happen in the future, there are a multitude of ways to prepare and benefit from this foreknowledge. War is no different.

One cannot benefit much from foreknowledge if there are no changes, so the best way to benefit is to foment those changes.

Additionally, all other things being equal, cohesive groups will benefit more from changes than individuals will.

It's only natural that the world's cleverest infiltrators/subverters would be the ones who start most of the world's revolutions. They place puppets on both sides of the issues who each persuasively tell the gullible goyim "I believe in such and such" and "I'm opposed to such and such".

"Revolutionary Spirit"? I think it's just a natural extension of their strategic cleverness to be involved in "CHANGE".