General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Scientists offer £1,000 prize for answer to the question: Why does hot water freeze faster than cold?
By Daily Mail Reporter PUBLISHED: 04:40 GMT, 27 June 2012 | UPDATED: 04:40 GMT, 27 June 2012 It is the baffling question which has perplexed the world's greatest scientific minds and even eluded great thinkers like Aristotle. But now scientists have become so infuriated about the mystery of why hot water freezes faster than cold, that they have put up a cash reward to find the answer. The Royal Society of Chemistry has offered £1,000 for a member of the public to come up with a convincing explanation for the phenomenon, which has mystified humankind. ![]() The scientific problem, which has become known as the Mpemba effect, has also defeated Francis Bacon and René Descartes. More...
The problem got its modern name in 1968, when Tanzanian student Erasto Mpemba posed the question to professors visiting his school. ![]() Mr Mpemba, who had been studying the problem for five years, had asked Professor Denis Osborne, of Dar es Salaam University: 'If you take two similar containers with equal volumes of water, one at 35C and the other at 100C, and put them in a refrigerator, the one that started at 100C freezes first. Why?' The professor was unable to answer and published a paper on the problem the following year, calling it the 'Mpemba Effect'. Brian Emsley, media relations manager at the Royal Society of Chemistry, wrote in the Guardian that the winner of the £1,000 prize will need to 'make a convincing case and employ some creative thinking'. Many standard physical effects are said to contribute to the phenomenon, although no single one has been conclusively proved as the cause. Theories put forward based on evaporation, convection and supercooling have all been put forward, but as yet the question still remains unanswered. Members of the public have until July 30 to submit their entries. They will be pitted against worldwide postgraduate scientists, who, sponsored by the Royal Society of Chemistry, will be tackling the same problem. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...#ixzz1z1kW4xoO |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
My theory: Thermal inertia. Once it starts the accellerated shedding of heat, it's like a runaway train. does that make any sense?? lol |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
My theory: Thermal inertia. Once it starts the accellerated shedding of heat, it's like a runaway train. I had always assumed that hot water froze before cold water because the former has a much lower concentration of dissolved gases. Cold water with it's dissolved nitrogen, oxygen and CO2, to name the main gases, behaves as a eutectic solution that exhibits a freezing point depression. In college, I was the top student in Physical Chemistry - loved it. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
You're kidding right? Thermal inertia? LOL Heat has no mass. You must be an engineer! Sure, the heat energy ITSELF has no mass, but it does "transfer" to the colder air around the water. My theory is that when you have a larger amount of heat transferring, it sets up a "current" (kind of like electrical current) and it is that process of heat transfer that has the "inertia". Make sense? Kind of an "intuitive" approach to the problem... quite often the WRONG way to think about scientific theories! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Latent heat of vaporization adds additional cooling ... vaporization rate is greater for hot water
![]() http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy_of_vaporization And the steam engine did more for the science of thermodynamics than thermodynamics ever did for the steam engine. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Water molecules hydrogen-bond to each other, forming complex structures within the water. The strength of these bonds are just below chemical bonds. Water at 35 C has already formed a lot of complex structures because it isn't being too disturbed. However, water at 100 C has almost no structures within it. As the water turns to ice, the structures within the water must be broken to form an ice crystal lattice. However, the hot water does not have any structure to it, so it easily arranges into an ice crystal lattice.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mpemba_effect
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...hot_water.html The UCR link has the nuanced answer. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
To be honest I had never before heard (or thought) that hot water froze first. I think I will test it out myself today... |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 17 (0 members and 17 guests) | |
|