General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
TO QUASH, practice. To overthrow or annul. The thing is neither a judge nor a chancellor has the authority to interfere with the obligations of contracts. A UCC1 lien can only be lifted by the one filing it. This is my understanding by reading the tea leaves. However, by issuing what looks like an official order to "quash" the lien the judicial actor in equity gives the elevators of the area the IMPRESSION that the lien is not in effect. This is far from the truth. If the tax lien owner were to sell the crop to any other entity that entity is receiving stolen property and could be prosecuted. A lien represents a contract. Contracts are prohibited from being messed with by any state of the union. It appears that they are being messed with but what are operating as states are not constitutional states but rather federal overlays. There is no prohibition that the feds can interfere with the obligations of contracts. Only the several States are prohibited from this. Interesting what lines of reasoning you can develop while reading tea leaves. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Palani: After fighting the local government thugs for a few years, and them getting me thrown in jail for several times, and Superior Court judges helping them out by throwing out my complains. I no longer see the road so clear cut, except for one thing. That is, as long as I give them notice and publish it in a wide circulating news paper in addition to personal service, they will not have an iota of an excuse to avoid my wrath once this system collapses.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
Palani: After fighting the local government thugs for a few years, and them getting me thrown in jail for several times, and Superior Court judges helping them out by throwing out my complains. I no longer see the road so clear cut, except for one thing. That is, as long as I give them notice and publish it in a wide circulating news paper in addition to personal service, they will not have an iota of an excuse to avoid my wrath once this system collapses. Three years back I asked for anyone who wanted to part of my government to respond with their oath and bond information. I got no resonses so presume everyone chooses to belong to someone elses government. I have no problem with this as long as they don't presume I am a part of the same government, being a lot more selective than other people appear to be. When I recorded the notice and non-response the recorder took my documents to the local district judge for his "approval" (she was going to take them to the county attorney but I pointed out to her that the office had been vacated in 1971 by constitutional amendment 31). The district judge read them and apparently could not figure out what I was about (rather than government I used the phrase "charitable trust"). So they got put in the county record. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|