General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
I've been meaning to ask this...Has anyone else had problems getting their free plant for new AOS members? Not that I wouldn't have joined anyway once I found out I got a discount for being a student and could afford it, but....I joined back in July 06 and haven't heard a thing about the free plant the website said I would get. I emailed the address they gave me if I had questions about my 'order' of membership when I placed it online, but I haven't gotten a response (twice, once after I got the other stuff for membership, and once again maybe a month ago when I realized it's almost time for me to renew and I still don't have a free plant or certificate or anything)
![]() ~Miss Paph |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
I joined two years ago.
I didn't renew this year for a myriad of reasons. I have enjoyed a lot of benefits but....is the free plant a membeship perk? If so, well, they've got something going cause two years ago when I joined, I never received any free plant! ![]() um, we get a free plant? I never got that! |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
You should be posting your concerns on the AOS forum. They don't like adverse publicity so you might get more attention there, http://aos.org/aos/MessageBoard/
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
I just joined and recieved in the first package a coupon for the free plant. As Grandma said there is a list of growers. I am heading south this week and will stop at one to save the shipping. Also included since I signed up for two years was a coupon for $30 off a purchase of over $100 at the same selected growers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
I need a free plant like I need a second appendix, but I am a member. Orchid judges have to be members in good standing. And I get a discount on AOS awards, which usually comes close to paying for the membership. I don't know that the magazine is all that interesting to me anymore, but it is a good publication and usually has a least one article that is worth reading, even to an 'old orchid curmudgeon' like myself.
I think your membership card gets you into various participating botanic gardens for free. I haven't tried that yet. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Lol...I see
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
Over the last year or so, I have started to feel more "Warm and Fuzzy" toward the AOS. The new Board seems genuinely concerned about the membership. The AOS Orchids magazine has improved the last several months. Back in the "dark years" of 2000 to 2005 there were very few articles to interest anyone who had more than 6 months experience raising orchids. Lately there have been 2 or even 3 articles per issue that I found worth reading. Now if they would just start accepting articles from real taxonomists who looked at living plants, rather than this molecular genetics junk that contradicts common sense. Sorry, I am just not "down with" the pronouncements by the "Gang of Four" molecular pseudo-taxonomists. I think they have it so wrong. Every group they touch is botched up worse by them. What we call Sophronitis cernua is NOT in the same genus as what we call a Laelia tenebrosa. Same tribe yes, but they are wildly different plants. Oh well. Over all the AOS is getting better again. Now we need an AOS library with a scanning service for remote members of the AOS.
Leo |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
The AOS Orchids magazine has improved the last several months. Back in the "dark years" of 2000 to 2005 there were very few articles to interest anyone who had more than 6 months experience raising orchids. Lately there have been 2 or even 3 articles per issue that I found worth reading. Now if they would just start accepting articles from real taxonomists who looked at living plants, rather than this molecular genetics junk that contradicts common sense. Sorry, I am just not "down with" the pronouncements by the "Gang of Four" molecular taxonomists. I think they have it so wrong. Every group they touch is botched up worse by them.
Oh well. Over all the AOS is getting better again. Now we need an AOS library with a scanning service for remote members. Leo |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|