LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-11-2011, 02:08 AM   #1
Dertrioz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default Patent enforcement...stuff like this makes me sick
As far as I can see this basically amounts to legal extortion, and imo is clearly not the intended use of the patent system.

http://patentexaminer.org/2011/09/in...porate-hotels/
Dertrioz is offline


Old 04-11-2011, 04:07 AM   #2
Oberjej

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
603
Senior Member
Default
As far as I can see this basically amounts to legal extortion, and imo is clearly not the intended use of the patent system.

http://patentexaminer.org/2011/09/in...porate-hotels/
Don't worry, they won't win.
Oberjej is offline


Old 04-11-2011, 04:34 AM   #3
Dertrioz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
Don't worry, they won't win.
Apparently many targetted companies have already paid out, as its cheaper than dragging through the courts (even if the company alledging infringment won't win).
Dertrioz is offline


Old 05-10-2011, 12:36 PM   #4
CIAFreeAgent

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
671
Senior Member
Default
In May, Motorola and Cisco fired back with a complaint asking for declaratory judgment, calling for the Delaware federal court to rule that their products don’t infringe, and declare Innovatio’s patents invalid.
“Innovatio is in the business of enforcing and licensing patents,” Motorola and Cisco allege in their complaint. “Innovatio does not sell or offer for sale any products.” This is what a lot of companies need to do. Team up and conquer these douchebags.
CIAFreeAgent is offline


Old 07-10-2011, 09:10 AM   #5
Gozmand

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
Eugh that article is so badly written!
Gozmand is offline


Old 07-11-2011, 06:31 AM   #6
bWxNFI3c

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
539
Senior Member
Default
Wait, so i'm 'missing out on a bunch of this argument. This is what i'm taking away with the article.

Are they suing for use of the term "WiFi"? or the use of a wireless network in general? In either I wouldn't pay up for jack squat. It seems to be extortion of the little guys to me. They take an inch here, an inch there. Until in the end they've stolen a good chunk of change from the little guys who can't afford it.

I hope they find a judge with some intelligence who will simply smack then down and level some fines on THEM. WiFi, Wireless, WLAN, whatever you wanna call it is a standard. It would be like a car company suing another company for making a car with 4 wheels and saying its similar.


Stupid law suits. Greedy idiots should be jailed for 24hrs with a man Bubba in the cell with them and no soap on a rope for thinking such craziness.
bWxNFI3c is offline


Old 08-10-2011, 07:03 AM   #7
stuntduood

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
http://www.tomshardware.com/news/app...lit,13609.html

how about this lol
stuntduood is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity