General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
Multiple issues, the one that inspired this thread was every time I pasted a chart into PPT, it added the legend from previous charts into the new chart. This was also after staying up all night and making changes 2 hours before a presentation. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Anyone who supports piracy is a scumbag. ![]() At least now I have a free, legal alternative! |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
OP - No, Microsoft Office is literally leagues above the alternatives out there.
They made an already excellent product amazing with the addition of "The Ribbon" and then tweaked it even further with the 2010 release. With the latest version of Office you have the best Word Processor and one of the best Spreadsheets. Office doesn't need to be expensive at all - Home edition allows installation on 3 computers for next to nothing. Educational version is again very cheap. Those that don't qualify - for the product you are getting the price is very reasonable. If you're stealing it then you're just scum anyway and really and in all honesty, don't matter. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Excel --- > KaleidaGraph or Origin + Adobe Illustrator for customizable vector graphs |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
You might get away with that at a personal level but we'd waste a fortune in man hours if we adopted that approach commercially. I'm coming from the approach taken by the scientist and engineer communities (of which Will is a fellow member of). Many of the journals take LaTeX typsetting file formats, which are infinitely more versatile and format text on pages better than anything any commercial typsetting software ever could. As for graphing and presenting, I'm not saying that everyone needs to do it this way, but it's what sets my presentations and graphs apart from the graphed excrement that some others choose to present their work with. I'd also argue that while yes, there is a learning curve with these tools, there are also learning curves with actually getting into the workings of something like Office, and that I could generate better quality visuals and spreadsheets as quick as anything anyone could do with their tools. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
![]() but then, the damage is done, OOo's team are mostly at LO now and more Linux distros are offering LO as standard. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Should have put this under Software discussions so I can raise my post count *cough* I errr mean it's the proper place lol.
Lots of people out there with 2003 and 2000 still, some of have been told how scary ribbon is! I think 2007 is the best one so far but maybe 2010 is patched up better than at launch. My scariest experience ever with Office was a six hour on-site job with a customer whose calendar in Outlook 2010 would cause it to crash. It didn't help she had like 10,000 e-mails in her folders, making the PST file absolutely massive. Finally I reverted them back to 2007 and the problem completely disappeared. This was six months ago. What the heck? |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|