[huntbytnkbel]

If you read between the lines, it looks like he's going to tell the police who he thinks it is.

Wouldn't you?
May as well give them a prime suspect

[theonsushv]

So you are making an assumption about him in order to accuse him of making an assumption?

No, I was trying to be the voice of reason. I don't know if he was going to accuse anyone, or beat them up or anything else. I was just making the point that you can't be too hasty with accusations. Do us both a favour and google the term "friendly advice".

[theonsushv]

Wouldn't you?
May as well give them a prime suspect

How would you feel if it turns out to be some kid from 10 streets away? It's much easier to tarnish someone's reputation than for them to clear it. If all you have is speculation then you can't blame someone. Yeh it sucks, but at least you'll sleep at night.

[Bromikka]

Whose talking about throwing accusations around, I'm talking Positive action, like Nails in front/behind his tyres, couple bags sugar in his gas tank, thermite in the centre of his bonnet.

I wouldn't even bother accusing anyone of anything, I'd just take positive Sneaky action!

Besides, if there's no CCTV, all the better for your revenge tactics.

And when it turns out you've got the wrong, innocent, person?

Payback is a b***h, just make sure you're paying the right account!

[Alexeryy]

Do us both a favour and google the term "friendly advice".

You say that as if you are renowned for providing good input into threads, let alone "friendly advice"... how about you just google "delusional" instead... might even find a pic of yourself there... or at least a link to your threads.

[theonsushv]

You say that as if you are renowned for providing good input into threads, let alone "friendly advice"... how about you just google "delusional" instead... might even find a pic of yourself there... or at least a link to your threads.

Another useful contribution to society from you [rolleyes]

[BUMbaronos]

And when it turns out you've got the wrong, innocent, person?

Well when hasn't Hearsay been proof enough ?



/WMD.... its just Hearsay, but lets invade anyway.

[Alexeryy]

Another useful contribution to society from you [rolleyes]

Fresh, coming from you to be honest... and I am sure the general consensus would agree.

You see, there is this little thing called "suspicion"... police use it all the time to gather evidence on someone whom they "suspect" being the culprit of a crime. If everybody had your mentality then people would get away scott free. As it has already been established: nobody (even the OP) has said they were going to take any retaliatory action or approach the suspect. He did think about it purely an intentionally in vein, but nothing more. Their name was simply going to be mentioned in connection with suspicions about the damage. If you have ever given a statement to police before you would know that one of the FIRST things they ask you if you are sure who did it, and if not if you suspect anybody who could be responsible or involved. But your entire commentary on this thread has been to try and find something to grind your gears with to somehow express your social and intellectual prowess (but one can only bluff with a pair of 3s for so long), and you are coming off 2nd best.

[huntbytnkbel]

How would you feel if it turns out to be some kid from 10 streets away? It's much easier to tarnish someone's reputation than for them to clear it. If all you have is speculation then you can't blame someone. Yeh it sucks, but at least you'll sleep at night.

It's not a kid from 10 streets away.
This is Japan, you'd have to live here to understand how I know it's this person. There is NO anti-social behaviour here.
All there is is this childish person who was pi$$ed off because we were in his usual spot - that is all.

I'm not going to do anything like get revenge or anything stupid.
Not yet anyway.

[theonsushv]

Fresh, coming from you to be honest... and I am sure the general consensus would agree.

You see, there is this little thing called "suspicion"... police use it all the time to gather evidence on someone whom they "suspect" being the culprit of a crime. If everybody had your mentality then people would get away scott free. As it has already been established: nobody (even the OP) has said they were going to take any retaliatory action or approach the suspect. He did think about it purely an intentionally in vein, but nothing more. Their name was simply going to be mentioned in connection with suspicions about the damage. If you have ever given a statement to police before you would know that one of the FIRST things they ask you if you are sure who did it, and if not if you suspect anybody who could be responsible or involved. But your entire commentary on this thread has been to try and find something to grind your gears with to somehow express your social and intellectual prowess (but one can only bluff with a pair of 3s for so long), and you are coming off 2nd best.

Fascinating post; I'd never heard of suspicion before.

Why should I take you seriously? Not only do you not seem to understand the concept of objective thinking - which is needed in situations like this - but your such a four year old child that you seem to think that saying things like "my friends don't like you" is a good way to enter a discussion. Let's talk when you get to high school.

[theonsushv]

It's not a kid from 10 streets away.
This is Japan, you'd have to live here to understand how I know it's this person. There is NO anti-social behaviour here.
All there is is this childish person who was pi$$ed off because we were in his usual spot - that is all.

I'm not going to do anything like get revenge or anything stupid.
Not yet anyway.

I understand what you are saying. But really, have you never had anyone give you the other side of an argument before now?

It seems that the only threads on here that go well are the ones where everyone agrees entirely with the original poster. Which means this is more of a knob-polishing board than a discussion board.

[huntbytnkbel]

I understand what you are saying. But really, have you never had anyone give you the other side of an argument before now?

It seems that the only threads on here that go well are the ones where everyone agrees entirely with the original poster. Which means this is more of a knob-polishing board than a discussion board.

I didn't post here to get people to agree with me me.
I posted here to let off some steam and tell everyone how pissed off I was with what happened and to just create discussion.

[Alexeryy]

Fascinating post; I'd never heard of suspicion before.

Why should I take you seriously? Not only do you not seem to understand the concept of objective thinking - which is needed in situations like this - but your such a four year old child that you seem to think that saying things like "my friends don't like you" is a good way to enter a discussion. Let's talk when you get to high school.

Hey you're entitled to an opinion. Just don't stoop to calling someone juvenile by simply sighting one small part of a post and somehow relating it to childish behavior, regardless of what context it was given. It's actually a more juvenile defense mechanism in itself, one that relates back to the age old act of imagining oneself as intellectually superior by personifying those around them as somewhat less developed, particularly in age. I have seen it all before, believe me.

At least my assumption of your social (and I suppose intellectual) underdevelopment was cited with evidence using past experiences, and not just arrogant dismissal by stating something totally presumptuous (which you are obviously quite good at).

My opening statement was very called for given your past history in these forums, and the fact that even on occasions where I have agreed with (and assisted you), your ridiculously limited capacity to know when you are making a fool of yourself has given you a very interesting reputation. If you can somehow find a way to relate this observation back to pre-school behavior, and not just on a basic instinctive level, then you seriously have a vivid imagination, and I wish you luck with it.

And for the record, the constant rebuttals by the OP towards almost all of your posts clearly indicate that you have yet to correctly interpret his intentions and actions, further exemplifying your lack of ability to understand even the simplest situations presented to you. He has proven his point, and many times over he has signified the disparity between your assumptions and his facts (and even on occasion taken into account your concerns), so just accept it.