General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
Very bad things...that's what would happen. Water doesn't absorb energy, rather it transfers it. So...probably tsunamis, maybe some earthquakes, maybe some new cracks in the earth's crust...stuff like that.
![]() BTW, didn't we have a post like this not too long ago? Edit: What do you know? It was you who asked a little while back. You're also the wacko asking about WiFi signals and bombs. WTF are you asking about this stuff for? [thumbdown] |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
Very bad things...that's what would happen. Water doesn't absorb energy, rather it transfers it. So...probably tsunamis, maybe some earthquakes, maybe some new cracks in the earth's crust...stuff like that. It most likely would have just been a giant explosion deep in the water |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Very bad things...that's what would happen. Water doesn't absorb energy, rather it transfers it. So...probably tsunamis, maybe some earthquakes, maybe some new cracks in the earth's crust...stuff like that. if it was close enough to a coast the water displacement could cause a tsunami, if it was further away the surface tension of the water would dissipate the wave more the further it travels. Anything short of detonating one off the coast of a country wouldnt have much of an affect, except a lot of dead marine life, and a little wave in land which would dissipate once it hit the break water |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
we've had this discussion.
it depends how powerful the bomb is. the tsar bomba or what ever its called would. but they've been testing nuclear bombs underwater for years. anyhow I wouldn't worry too much about a single nuke going off Id be more worried about the millions of tonnes of WWII and other conflict defunct weaponry (inc biological) that been dumped off in the Atlantic in the trenches. ![]() and there's been instances of nukes lost at sea that haven't exploded but never been recovered there's one off the coast of Portugal somewhere |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
we've had this discussion. ![]() and there's been instances of nukes lost at sea that haven't exploded but never been recovered there's one off the coast of Portugal somewhere You're thinking of the USS Scorpion - the US Navy knows where it is (but won't say publicly) and keep track of the nuke warheads' condition. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
What are you taking about? of course water absorbs energy, its has enormous potential for absorbing energy.. boil a kettle (preferrably a good 2kw+ one) and see how quickly the water reaches boiling point. on another note If a nuke exploded deep under water the extremely high water pressure would dampen the explosion. depending on the pressure it could be 10 to a 100 times less powerfull. Anyway, do you have any kind of idea how much pressure a nuclear blast creates? Bottom of the Marianas trench, around 15,000 psi. The Hiroshima explosion created a blast wave of 5 psi a mile away, and that's a very small device by today's standards. A few thousand psi might dampen it slightly, but not enough to stop a nice tsunami and wreak havoc. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Should have said dampen, not absorb. In order to transfer it, of course water needs to absorb the energy. ok, so i just looked it up and the only tsunami ever pinned on a nuclear explosion was one by the french, something went wrong and the weapon exploded half way down the bore hole they had drilled into an atoll causeing an underwater landslide that formed the waves. So, barring a landslide or earthquake caused by the explosion, a nuclear weapon under water will not cause a tsunami. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
A nukes power is nothing compared to an earthquake..nothing at all.
The biggest concern would be from using a nuke to set off an earthquake in a weak area. The quake is what could cause the real damage and tsunamis. Nukes are far less effective underwater, even at ground level, which is why they go off before hitting the ground. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
A nukes power is nothing compared to an earthquake..nothing at all. And from the underwater nuke blasts I've seen on documentaries and youtube it will do nothing but create one big f*cking splash. or a kinda of mist which will simply have a long hang time and fall back down without causing any damage (unless you happen to be in the area then you'd probably die) |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|