A 1935 US Plan for Invasion of Canada - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**isogeople** · 10-27-2006, 04:15 PM

Just be happy that you were considered. Since we have invasion plans for everyone else, if we didn't have one for you its because we didn't think you were worth invading

.

**WeissVine** · 10-27-2006, 04:34 PM

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Just be happy that you were considered. Since we have invasion plans for everyone else, if we didn't have one for you its because we didn't think you were worth invading

. What suprises me is that we have a lot of oil...It's just the excuses that would be hard to find for invading us...

Spec.

**Lhiistyssdds** · 10-27-2006, 04:38 PM

Originally posted by Spec
What suprises me is that we have a lot of oil...It's just the excuses that would be hard to find for invading us...

Spec. "We"?

Quebec doesn't have any oil at all really, and has no claim (federally or otherwise) on the Oil out west.

**baxodrom** · 10-27-2006, 04:40 PM

Back in the 1930s, Canada didn't have a lot of oil by any means.

**55Beaphable** · 10-27-2006, 04:46 PM

Originally posted by Spec
What suprises me is that we have a lot of oil...It's just the excuses that would be hard to find for invading us...

Spec. Liberating Alberta from French oppression

**radicalvolume** · 10-27-2006, 04:54 PM

Originally posted by Asher

"We"?

Quebec doesn't have any oil at all really, and has no claim (federally or otherwise) on the Oil out west. Still talking out of your ass Asher?

http://www.junex.ca/eng/comm-10-05-06-en.htm

Gaspesie...That's in Quebec mind you...

And second, I was just joking...Trying to make a link with Iraq...seems my joke was taken as a troll.

Spec.

**LSDDSL** · 10-27-2006, 05:00 PM

Originally posted by Spec
Still talking out of your ass Asher?

http://www.junex.ca/eng/comm-10-05-06-en.htm

Gaspesie...That's in Quebec mind you...

Spec. Do you understand how pathetically small Quebec's oil outputs are?

Last time I checked it's well under a quarter of a percent of Alberta's...

**Pmeidstc** · 10-27-2006, 05:01 PM

Originally posted by Asher

Do you understand how pathetically small Quebec's oil outputs are?

Last time I checked it's well under a quarter of a percent of Alberta's... First, this thread is not about oil.

Second, a minute ago, according to you, Quebec had none.

Now, according to you, again, we have almost none...Only because you are still talking out of your ass.

The wells that were found in gaspesie, that's without counting the ones near Kuujuaq and off-shore, are projected to of the biggest in output in Canada.

But those news were probably not shown in Alberta cuz you red-necks need to beleive your superior in oil, because, admit it, that's all you guys have.

Spec.

**newshep** · 10-27-2006, 05:06 PM

Originally posted by Spec
The wells that were found in gaspesie, that's without counting the ones near Kuujuaq and off-shore, are projected to of the biggest in output in Canada. That's total bullshit.

Are you confusing Quebec's "barrels per day" with figures like "million barrels per day"?

**ImapFidaarram** · 10-27-2006, 05:14 PM

From Spec's link:
well stabilized at a daily production of 34 barrels of light oil

The current Oil Sands production is 1 million barrels a day...

**Unjucky** · 10-27-2006, 05:24 PM

Originally posted by Spec
Actually, Alberta's barrel output per day is 1,200,000. That includes conventional oil. I said Oil Sands was about a million a day, which is true.

Give it time asher, that was just a test. When they made the discovery in March 2006 IINM they estimated the possible output per day would be around 400 000. After the test were successful and found out that there were other wells they said a possibility of 750000 a day in the next 20 years. That may have been just to put the shares on fire, but that's what they said on the news.

I'm trying to find a link, will post soon.

Spec. By 2020, the Oil Sands are projected to do 3 million barrels per day...

I sincerely doubt they'd get anywhere near 750,000 in Quebec from conventional wells. That's just them trying to boost their share price to ignorant Quebec investors.

There's a reason this isn't big news, and that's because people out west -- who know Oil -- know better.

**newspetty** · 10-27-2006, 05:31 PM

And of course investors from around the world would never invest here. Invest in Quebec's energy market? You're damn right they wouldn't. That's just asking for trouble...

**mikeyyuiok** · 10-27-2006, 05:38 PM

That's not a troll, it's true.

You clearly don't have any idea what the mindset of oil companies are. Quebec's government is not Oil-friendly in the slightest, in fact Quebec has been linked to the NEP thanks to Trudeau and I'm not sure Oil companies would want to risk another whacko getting in power (and in Quebec, this is very likely) that would cost them billions of dollars.

Not when there are other hot markets to invest in...

**FsQGF1Mp** · 10-27-2006, 05:45 PM

@imran No.

Ebergy market is wide Asher. Hydro, and windmills are included, and yes people invest in it. Oil is not the only source of energy.

Spec.

**Rellshare** · 10-27-2006, 05:54 PM

Divide and conquer. It's part of the plan, isn't it?

**wp6Eg2Fm** · 10-27-2006, 05:57 PM

Originally posted by Spec
Sure...for now. But Hydro is the futur and a renewable ressource, unlike oil.

Spec. Hydro has been the future for 50 years, and Oil has been running out for 50 years.

**FjFHQLJQ** · 10-27-2006, 06:04 PM

Originally posted by Asher

Hydro has been the future for 50 years, and Oil has been running out for 50 years. So you're telling me that oil is a renewable ressource?

Spec.

**Klavalala** · 10-27-2006, 06:10 PM

Unless the price is going to be too low...

At what price(barrel price) is it profitable to extract oilsand?

**ballingham** · 10-27-2006, 06:24 PM

So The US planned to invade us in 1935....

Spec.

**STYWOMBORGOSY** · 10-27-2006, 06:39 PM

... but your new "Stealth Nation" technology saved you.

-Arrian

10-27-2006, 04:15 PM	#1
isogeople Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 476 Senior Member	A 1935 US Plan for Invasion of Canada Just be happy that you were considered. Since we have invasion plans for everyone else, if we didn't have one for you its because we didn't think you were worth invading . Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 04:34 PM	#2
WeissVine Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 533 Senior Member	Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui Just be happy that you were considered. Since we have invasion plans for everyone else, if we didn't have one for you its because we didn't think you were worth invading . What suprises me is that we have a lot of oil...It's just the excuses that would be hard to find for invading us... Spec. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 04:38 PM	#3
Lhiistyssdds Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 469 Senior Member	Originally posted by Spec What suprises me is that we have a lot of oil...It's just the excuses that would be hard to find for invading us... Spec. "We"? Quebec doesn't have any oil at all really, and has no claim (federally or otherwise) on the Oil out west. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 04:40 PM	#4
baxodrom Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 351 Senior Member	Back in the 1930s, Canada didn't have a lot of oil by any means. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 04:46 PM	#5
55Beaphable Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 572 Senior Member	Originally posted by Spec What suprises me is that we have a lot of oil...It's just the excuses that would be hard to find for invading us... Spec. Liberating Alberta from French oppression Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 04:54 PM	#6
radicalvolume Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 453 Senior Member	Originally posted by Asher "We"? Quebec doesn't have any oil at all really, and has no claim (federally or otherwise) on the Oil out west. Still talking out of your ass Asher? http://www.junex.ca/eng/comm-10-05-06-en.htm Gaspesie...That's in Quebec mind you... And second, I was just joking...Trying to make a link with Iraq...seems my joke was taken as a troll. Spec. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 05:00 PM	#7
LSDDSL Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 619 Senior Member	Originally posted by Spec Still talking out of your ass Asher? http://www.junex.ca/eng/comm-10-05-06-en.htm Gaspesie...That's in Quebec mind you... Spec. Do you understand how pathetically small Quebec's oil outputs are? Last time I checked it's well under a quarter of a percent of Alberta's... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 05:01 PM	#8
Pmeidstc Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 407 Senior Member	Originally posted by Asher Do you understand how pathetically small Quebec's oil outputs are? Last time I checked it's well under a quarter of a percent of Alberta's... First, this thread is not about oil. Second, a minute ago, according to you, Quebec had none. Now, according to you, again, we have almost none...Only because you are still talking out of your ass. The wells that were found in gaspesie, that's without counting the ones near Kuujuaq and off-shore, are projected to of the biggest in output in Canada. But those news were probably not shown in Alberta cuz you red-necks need to beleive your superior in oil, because, admit it, that's all you guys have. Spec. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 05:06 PM	#9
newshep Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 388 Senior Member	Originally posted by Spec The wells that were found in gaspesie, that's without counting the ones near Kuujuaq and off-shore, are projected to of the biggest in output in Canada. That's total bullshit. Are you confusing Quebec's "barrels per day" with figures like "million barrels per day"? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 05:14 PM	#10
ImapFidaarram Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 537 Senior Member	From Spec's link: well stabilized at a daily production of 34 barrels of light oil The current Oil Sands production is 1 million barrels a day... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 05:24 PM	#11
Unjucky Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 555 Senior Member	Originally posted by Spec Actually, Alberta's barrel output per day is 1,200,000. That includes conventional oil. I said Oil Sands was about a million a day, which is true. Give it time asher, that was just a test. When they made the discovery in March 2006 IINM they estimated the possible output per day would be around 400 000. After the test were successful and found out that there were other wells they said a possibility of 750000 a day in the next 20 years. That may have been just to put the shares on fire, but that's what they said on the news. I'm trying to find a link, will post soon. Spec. By 2020, the Oil Sands are projected to do 3 million barrels per day... I sincerely doubt they'd get anywhere near 750,000 in Quebec from conventional wells. That's just them trying to boost their share price to ignorant Quebec investors. There's a reason this isn't big news, and that's because people out west -- who know Oil -- know better. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 05:31 PM	#12
newspetty Join Date Dec 2005 Posts 501 Senior Member	And of course investors from around the world would never invest here. Invest in Quebec's energy market? You're damn right they wouldn't. That's just asking for trouble... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 05:38 PM	#13
mikeyyuiok Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 502 Senior Member	That's not a troll, it's true. You clearly don't have any idea what the mindset of oil companies are. Quebec's government is not Oil-friendly in the slightest, in fact Quebec has been linked to the NEP thanks to Trudeau and I'm not sure Oil companies would want to risk another whacko getting in power (and in Quebec, this is very likely) that would cost them billions of dollars. Not when there are other hot markets to invest in... Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 05:45 PM	#14
FsQGF1Mp Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 516 Senior Member	@imran No. Ebergy market is wide Asher. Hydro, and windmills are included, and yes people invest in it. Oil is not the only source of energy. Spec. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 05:54 PM	#15
Rellshare Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 479 Senior Member	Divide and conquer. It's part of the plan, isn't it? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

10-27-2006, 05:57 PM	#16
wp6Eg2Fm Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 531 Senior Member	Originally posted by Spec Sure...for now. But Hydro is the futur and a renewable ressource, unlike oil. Spec. Hydro has been the future for 50 years, and Oil has been running out for 50 years. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 06:04 PM	#17
FjFHQLJQ Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 485 Senior Member	Originally posted by Asher Hydro has been the future for 50 years, and Oil has been running out for 50 years. So you're telling me that oil is a renewable ressource? Spec. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 06:10 PM	#18
Klavalala Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 378 Senior Member	Unless the price is going to be too low... At what price(barrel price) is it profitable to extract oilsand? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 06:24 PM	#19
ballingham Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 477 Senior Member	So The US planned to invade us in 1935.... Spec. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-27-2006, 06:39 PM	#20
STYWOMBORGOSY Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 510 Senior Member	... but your new "Stealth Nation" technology saved you. -Arrian Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote