LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-29-2012, 08:34 PM   #81
Unlinozistimi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
I did not know what was wrong, so I asked. I never said that it was wrong.

Turn off bunglevision.
Unlinozistimi is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 09:53 PM   #82
nvideoe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
Another one: worst/worse.

eg "That the worse film I've ever seen"
nvideoe is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:07 PM   #83
iceleliewBync

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
605
Senior Member
Default
Another one: worst/worse.

eg "That the worse film I've ever seen"
By your own logic, how do you know that's not just a typo?
iceleliewBync is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:09 PM   #84
nvideoe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
By your own logic, how do you know that's not just a typo?
Because quiet is very easy to mistype as quite, not so I think with worse/worst. Also, I see it much more often.
nvideoe is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:10 PM   #85
Unlinozistimi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
That data is bad.
Unlinozistimi is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:18 PM   #86
iceleliewBync

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
605
Senior Member
Default
Because quiet is very easy to mistype as quite, not so I think with worse/worst. Also, I see it much more often.
iceleliewBync is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:30 PM   #87
nvideoe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
So now you've resorted to positing silly memes?

Quiet/Quite is the same letters but ordered differently, worse/worst is a completely different letter. By your logic every error here must be a typo.
nvideoe is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:31 PM   #88
Unlinozistimi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
Bungle,

I think you are a typo.
Unlinozistimi is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:53 PM   #89
Patamuta

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
That data is bad.
I have to admit, reference to 'data' in singular form is a pet hate of mine.
Patamuta is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:56 PM   #90
iceleliewBync

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
605
Senior Member
Default
I have to admit, reference to 'data' in singular form is a pet hate of mine.
Aww, datums.
iceleliewBync is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 10:56 PM   #91
nvideoe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
I have to admit, reference to 'data' in singular form is a pet hate of mine.
Dice/Die.
nvideoe is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 11:12 PM   #92
PriniMai

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
356
Senior Member
Default
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bungle

You ever read that Bungle? Very informative.
PriniMai is offline


Old 08-29-2012, 11:48 PM   #93
affozyBoomi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
The constant misspelling of rouge and rogue on a daily basis got old a long time ago as well.
affozyBoomi is offline


Old 08-30-2012, 01:02 AM   #94
Spongebob

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default
The constant misspelling of rouge and rogue on a daily basis got old a long time ago as well.
NERF ROUGE STUN WARLOCK
Spongebob is offline


Old 08-30-2012, 01:16 AM   #95
Smittoh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
627
Senior Member
Default
I have to admit, reference to 'data' in singular form is a pet hate of mine.
Because?

Data is (are?) a latin plural. Almost no one knows what that even means, or the difference between mass nouns and count nouns. Anyway, mass nouns (bacon, butter, laundry) always take the singular form, so "the data is correct" would be correct.

There's a wrinkle.

The original meaning of datum was "a given fact or assumption" where datum was singular and data was plural (meaning facts or assumptions). Later, as science became a common discipline, the word data became more associated with grouping of numeric information and labeling as we know it now.

For ease of reading and adhering to the rule of mass nouns, saying "data is correct" is correct if you're using the word to mean a grouping of information. If you're using it in the old English sense or literal Latin sense, you'd have to refer to it in plural. But you're not, are you?
Smittoh is offline


Old 08-30-2012, 01:22 AM   #96
iceleliewBync

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
605
Senior Member
Default
Because?

Data is (are?) a latin plural. Almost no one knows what that even means, or the difference between mass nouns and count nouns. Anyway, mass nouns (bacon, butter, laundry) always take the singular form, so "the data is correct" would be correct.

There's a wrinkle.

The original meaning of datum was "a given fact or assumption" where datum was singular and data was plural (meaning facts or assumptions). Later, as science became a common discipline, the word data became more associated with grouping of numeric information and labeling as we know it now.

For ease of reading and adhering to the rule of mass nouns, saying "data is correct" is correct if you're using the word to mean a grouping of information. If you're using it in the old English sense or literal Latin sense, you'd have to refer to it in plural. But you're not, are you?
Even that doesn't go anywhere near explaining the difference between data, datum and dataset in a programming environment.
iceleliewBync is offline


Old 08-30-2012, 03:40 AM   #97
Patamuta

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
Because?

Data is (are?) a latin plural. Almost no one knows what that even means, or the difference between mass nouns and count nouns. Anyway, mass nouns (bacon, butter, laundry) always take the singular form, so "the data is correct" would be correct.

There's a wrinkle.

The original meaning of datum was "a given fact or assumption" where datum was singular and data was plural (meaning facts or assumptions). Later, as science became a common discipline, the word data became more associated with grouping of numeric information and labeling as we know it now.

For ease of reading and adhering to the rule of mass nouns, saying "data is correct" is correct if you're using the word to mean a grouping of information. If you're using it in the old English sense or literal Latin sense, you'd have to refer to it in plural. But you're not, are you?
Not in general usage, but when used at work. In statistics and associated programming, the definition of datum and data are quite stringent and actuaries working in a technical environment should know better.
Patamuta is offline


Old 08-30-2012, 04:12 AM   #98
iceleliewBync

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
605
Senior Member
Default
Not in general usage, but when used at work. In statistics and associated programming, the definition of datum and data are quite stringent and actuaries working in a technical environment should know better.
WHY DID NOBODY LAUGH AT MY AWW, DATUMS JOKE???
iceleliewBync is offline


Old 08-30-2012, 04:20 AM   #99
Patamuta

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
In all honesty, I laughed, but read it on my phone so didn't reply.
Patamuta is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:13 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity