DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Unfair Taxation (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50313)

T5qYkHWQ 10-24-2005 07:00 AM

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Although what Che is saying is true. If a state has both sales tax and income tax then you should be able to deduct both... I do agree with this statement, but calling the new arrangement unfair is way wrong. It is a HUGE step in the right direction.

weluvjessicaalba 10-26-2005 07:00 AM

Originally posted by Harry Tuttle


I think that deal was cut out of the tax code in the 80's. The IRS was probably sick of receiving shoe boxes in the mail. I have a way to figure it out. Reverse receipts. Send in how much you pay in rent (sales tax exempt), non-junk food groceries (ditto), medical care, tuition etc (all the sales tax exemptions). Call this A. Then send in your bank balance at the beginning of the year and the end of the year. B and C respectively. Then send in your income (D).

D - C + B - A is how much you spent on taxable goods and services. Multiply by your state's sales tax to get E, the amount you spent in sales tax during the year.

halfstreet 11-02-2005 07:00 AM

Unfair Taxation
 
Flat Tax, not.

MightyMasc 11-24-2005 07:00 AM

Unfair my azz! Before states with income taxes (and consequently low sales tax) were able to deduct that on their federal income taxes. States that only had a sales tax could deduct nothing...nada...zero. This new law FINALLY levels the playing field. The system before was the grossly unfair one.

Borzopayn 11-26-2005 07:00 AM

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
probably the states with the most social programs. So they are benefitting from better social programs, better education, and less crime.

You can't expect to live in the best states, and not have to pay something.

So why can't they take their sales tax off their federal tax? That doesn't answer the question, it just avoids it, Diss http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ies/tongue.gif. I gave my answer.

they don't deserve it. Their added benefit comes from living in good states.

Would you rather live in my state with the highest smoking rate, the highest suicide, rate, the worst schools, the higest teen dropout rate, high crime rates, etc. etc.

Edqpdnuu 12-24-2005 07:00 AM

Originally posted by Dissident
most states without an income tax have high sales tax. My state is one example. That's because your state, like my state, has other massive sources of revenue than taxing its own citizens' income, i.e., tourism. We have beaches and a mouse, you have gambling and prostitution. A high sales tax allows us to tax tourists, and thus, supposedly, tax residents less. Generally, we don't have to pay sales tax on food and shelter, so we're pretty insulated from having to pay for our state services.

SaraKonradtt 01-24-2006 07:00 AM

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
most states without an income tax have high sales tax.

What about states with high incomes tax and high sales tax? probably the states with the most social programs. So they are benefitting from better social programs, better education, and less crime.

You can't expect to live in the best states, and not have to pay something.

Hsmrcahr 02-07-2006 07:00 AM

You don't pay sales tax on gasoline? Unlikely. More likely is that gas stations are simply required to include that tax along with all the other taxes in the posted price.

imawlBoli 04-20-2006 07:00 AM

Shhhh, keep it quiet, you don't want people getting upset over this http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...ilies/wink.gif

Rellshare 05-19-2006 07:00 AM

Originally posted by alva
If you are a real nut, you could always add up all of your receipts from the year, like they did in ancient times, and hope that it's more advantageous.

Don' you guys do that anymore? I think that deal was cut out of the tax code in the 80's. The IRS was probably sick of receiving shoe boxes in the mail.

Hbkj89D2 07-09-2006 07:00 AM

Originally posted by KrazyHorse


I have a way to figure it out. Reverse receipts. Send in how much you pay in rent (sales tax exempt), non-junk food groceries (ditto), medical care, tuition etc (all the sales tax exemptions). Call this A. Then send in your bank balance at the beginning of the year and the end of the year. B and C respectively. Then send in your income (D).

D - C + B - A is how much you spent on taxable goods and services. Multiply by your state's sales tax to get E, the amount you spent in sales tax during the year. I REEEEEEAAAAAALLLLLYYYYYY doubt the IRS would accept that explanation. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/smile.gif

gusunsuth 07-18-2006 07:00 AM

I thought this thread was going to be about profit.

fapourfasiark 07-24-2006 07:00 AM

Originally posted by Flubber
Quick question - Does the federal tac code allow people in states with state inccome tax to deduct that income tax in calculating federal tax?? I'm just trying to understand the reasoning You bet it did. Now there is a choice. You can deduct eithier (in states with both) one and therefore choose which gives you the bigger deduction.

Stivenslivakovishhhs 08-08-2006 07:00 AM

Originally posted by Flubber


Thats what I was thinking. It seems unfair that a person can deduct all if his state uses one type of taxation but only a portion if his state uses two methods The table that you have to use to calculate your deduction way underestimates the amount of sales tax you actually pay...unless of course you want to keep all your reciepts for the whole year. It is NOT a boon, but rather a move in the correct direction.

ClaudeMarkus 08-18-2006 07:00 AM

commies talking about unfair taxation. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/lol.gif

viepedorlella 08-13-2011 08:15 PM

Allowing any deductions for state taxes on the federal income tax is unfair.

codespokerbonus 08-13-2011 08:57 PM

Wait, WTF?

dwestemesse 08-13-2011 11:37 PM

Quote:

If there's a federal deduction for state taxes, why don't the states just hike taxes a whole hell of a lot...?
Subsidizing something usually increases its consumption, but it doesn't necessarily increase it "a whole hell of a lot".

smirnoffdear 08-14-2011 05:11 AM

But still, what the ****? Why was this thread nevived?

SarSerceSaice 08-14-2011 05:15 AM

Quote:

Inasmuch as the federal deduction fully refunds state taxes, the states have no economic incentive not to to raise taxes to precisely the federal rate, thereby capturing 100% of the tax revenue at no (marginal) deadweight loss.
For this to be true then everyone's perception of the effect of the tax would have to be the same. Which obviously isn't the case.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2