DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Speculation over why US crime stats are recording falls (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/showthread.php?t=50983)

DuesTyr 06-21-2011 10:05 PM

Speculation over why US crime stats are recording falls
 
Less crack rock. Or, I should say, less interest in using crack.

Mmzmptvk 06-21-2011 10:21 PM

Quote:

Did you even read the first post before commenting? #2


I like 7,8 and 10
Yes.

popsicesHoupe 06-21-2011 10:24 PM

If you had mentioned the # 2 in your post, there wouldn't have been that issue. A common courtesy.

Peptobismol 06-21-2011 10:27 PM

Quote:

If you had mentioned the # 2 in your post, there wouldn't have been that issue. A common courtesy.
Excuse me? Why would I need to?

Less crack usage. I said it. What's the point of me specifying #2?

I see how it is. I do something it's wrong. Everybody else does the exact same thing and it's all dandy. Real logical place this Apolyton is. It's the ****ing twilight zone.

kucheravka 06-21-2011 10:47 PM

Was it my responsibility to specify #2? Why? How is that common courtesy? Is Bugs tabulating our responses and presenting them in numeric form makes his data gathering easier?

Ad0i89Od 06-21-2011 10:52 PM

I like #9. Take that Jack Thompson!

#10 is a load of crap. See http://apolyton.net/showthread.php/1...he-****-Canada

whatisthebluepill 06-22-2011 12:06 AM

I also think the playing of video games (I'm not saying what number that is on purpose) plays a role as well because it occupies enough young people instead of them hanging on the corner and getting into trouble. I still believe the decline in the popularity of crack is the primary reason for the decline, though.

abouthotels 06-22-2011 12:14 AM

#11 - With the state local budget crunches, we had to lay off the people who keep the crime statistics.....

feqlmwtuqx 06-22-2011 01:02 AM

Quote:

Is Bugs tabulating our responses and presenting them in numeric form makes his data gathering easier?
Yes.

Incidentally, your contributions disappoint me.

lkastonidwedsrer 06-22-2011 01:11 AM

Oh, I forgot. Social mobility for minorities has increased greatly. Even if you were a really smart black kid in the late 60's it was hard to get a job at the white dominated firm which wasn't low paying where as now more jobs and better types of jobs are open to folks who previously would have been marginalized.

pseusawbappem 06-22-2011 01:16 AM

Quote:

Excuse me? Why would I need to?

Less crack usage. I said it. What's the point of me specifying #2?

I see how it is. I do something it's wrong. Everybody else does the exact same thing and it's all dandy. Real logical place this Apolyton is. It's the ****ing twilight zone.
Crack didn't take off until the 80's but despite all the media coverage about gangs and drive by shootings violent crime in the 80's was lower then the 70's.

Uttephabeta 06-22-2011 01:20 AM

Quote:

Crack didn't take off until the 80's but despite all the media coverage about gangs and drive by shootings violent crime in the 80's was lower then the 70's.
The Law of Oerdin is Always Wrong NEVER FAILS!!!

US Violent crime rate:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Crime_Rate.jpg

FjFHQLJQ 06-22-2011 01:37 AM

Quote:

The Law of Oerdin is Always Wrong NEVER FAILS!!!

US Violent crime rate:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Crime_Rate.jpg
I'm not sure where you got that graph but the FBI says "serious crimes" peaked by 1980 (probably in the late 70's but the graph doesn't show every year) and has been going down ever since. Please note crack wasn't big until the mid80's so your claims about crack are wrong.

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/1365/933.gif

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Stainditnew 06-22-2011 01:57 AM

All crime, not just drug crimes.

b91ZmxzX 06-22-2011 02:08 AM

8. The baby boomers grew up. With birth rates peaking between 1957 and 1961, the proportion of men in the US in their late teens and early 20s was highest in the late 70s and early 80s. As time went on, the proportion of people at "criminal age" decreased. That this was number 8 shows that this article is ****

Oppofeescom 06-22-2011 02:34 AM

Quote:

It's mostly minorities, if that makes you feel better (it probably shouldn't). It probably varies substantially by state (I know I say this of a lot of US statistics but it's true). For instance I'd bet California has a higher incarceration rate than say Oregon because of the three strikes you're out policy.
Louisiana and Mississippi do appear to have high incarceration rates:
http://www.publicagenda.org/charts/i...ion-rate-state

maxfieldj1 06-22-2011 02:42 AM

It proves my point, the number varies rather heavily. Incarceration rates are much higher in Louisiana than Maine, for instance.

xpost

blackjackiisre 06-22-2011 02:58 AM

Another chart from wikipedia:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._by_race_2.gif
5% of black males are in prison

doxinwasido 06-22-2011 03:06 AM

What are the differences between violent crime and "serious crimes"? I'm guessing burglary isn't a violent crime.

Brewpralgar 06-22-2011 03:11 AM

Here:

http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

Property crimes peaked in 1980 at 5,353 reported property crimes per 100K people (which actually was not much more than the 5000+ throughout the late 80's til 1992).

VIOLENT crimes, however... hit 596.1 in 1980, went down a bit, then shot up to 757.5 by 1992; From 1986-1997, the violent crime rate was higher than 1980.


The Law of Oerdin is Always Wrong never fails! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/lol.gif


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2