LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-19-2011, 08:15 AM   #1
electmobile

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
550
Senior Member
Default A Fetus Is...
A body part, like a finger or a tooth.
electmobile is offline


Old 04-19-2011, 09:01 AM   #2
Zhgrlpil

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
456
Senior Member
Default
Voted.
Zhgrlpil is offline


Old 04-19-2011, 09:54 AM   #3
K0aM7urg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
378
Senior Member
Default
That looks more like a bird.
K0aM7urg is offline


Old 04-19-2011, 04:21 PM   #4
Dapnoinaacale

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
A parasite.
Be fair. That applies to all children.
Dapnoinaacale is offline


Old 04-19-2011, 05:32 PM   #5
Chooriwrocaey

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
463
Senior Member
Default
Abortion
Chooriwrocaey is offline


Old 04-19-2011, 07:18 PM   #6
lalpphilalk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
That looks more like a bird.
It's clearly a human fetus head attached to a bird's body.
lalpphilalk is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 12:21 AM   #7
Ruiceara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
492
Senior Member
Default
I'd answer differently depending on how far into term it is.
I was thinking the same thing. This poll is flawed because of lack of time frame references in fetal development.
Ruiceara is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 12:28 AM   #8
kaysions

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
317
Senior Member
Default
Sausage and eggs, all in one. Yummy.
kaysions is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 05:19 AM   #9
Tilmbeinymn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
it's not a child, it's human though.
Every human once was a fetus. In fact there are more humans that have been a fetus then a toddler.
It's a parasite in some way. it's paraciting on the mother. It's just not a biological paracite. that's just how nature works for mammals. First you paracite on your mother, then later she paracites on you

So the answer is: it's a human being in the stadium of a fetus.
But that answer is not in the list.
Tilmbeinymn is offline


Old 04-20-2011, 06:45 PM   #10
tefraxKedWere

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
392
Senior Member
Default
In your opinion. I don't consider it a Human being early in the pregnancy. But again, that is just my opinion.
That's weird, it's a human being in it's earliest form. It's not a matter of opinions. What is an opinion is if one's allowed to abort it or not.
Some just do not want to name it a human being b/c then suddenly it's awkward to allow abortion.
tefraxKedWere is offline


Old 04-21-2011, 12:13 AM   #11
SAUNDERSAN

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
371
Senior Member
Default
"Tasty on toast with a side of applesauce" should have been a poll option.
SAUNDERSAN is offline


Old 04-21-2011, 02:34 AM   #12
Argurnenoni

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
344
Senior Member
Default
I enjoy the taste of chicken fetuses.
Argurnenoni is offline


Old 04-21-2011, 10:27 AM   #13
WhonyGataxott

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
632
Senior Member
Default
"Tasty on toast with a side of applesauce" should have been a poll option.
Poutine with fetus gravy is better, not to mention fetus lovers pizza with double cheese
WhonyGataxott is offline


Old 04-21-2011, 02:11 PM   #14
gomosopions

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
467
Senior Member
Default
I have always known you had donkey balls...
Maybe you should go back to your biology lessons in kindergarten
gomosopions is offline


Old 04-21-2011, 03:29 PM   #15
55Beaphable

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
572
Senior Member
Default
What species is it then?
Please learn what meiosis is. Sperm only has 23 chromosomes. Hence, not strictly "human". It's not particularly useful to assign a "species" to it, since it is a reproductive cell.

You're basically asking the same question as "what species is an unfertilized chicken egg?" It's not a chicken, it hasn't been fertilized.
55Beaphable is offline


Old 04-21-2011, 05:51 PM   #16
opelayday

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
537
Senior Member
Default
Please learn what meiosis is. Sperm only has 23 chromosomes. Hence, not strictly "human". It's not particularly useful to assign a "species" to it, since it is a reproductive cell.

You're basically asking the same question as "what species is an unfertilized chicken egg?" It's not a chicken, it hasn't been fertilized.
You're not human if you have the wrong number of chromosomes? So you wouldn't object to killing people with, say, Trisomy 21? You Nazi.
opelayday is offline


Old 04-21-2011, 10:05 PM   #17
Uzezqelj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
585
Senior Member
Default
I don't pretend to be a biology expert. I ****ing hated biology. The only good thing about that whole class was the gel electrophoresis* lab, even though nobody fully understood it. But for god's sake gribbler, are you going to make me explain the difference between trisomy and gametes?

One has only half the genome and cannot replicate, the other simply has a mutation.

*this sounds complicated and sophisticated but I swear you basically just play with expensive jello and pipettes
Uzezqelj is offline


Old 04-21-2011, 11:01 PM   #18
Wetekemieluth

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
380
Senior Member
Default
You will not find a single reputable reference that defines the embryo or fetus as a distinct organism than that of the child that the embryo/fetus may eventually develop into - rather, the embryo/fetus is the child that it will may eventually develop into. Example 1. Example 2. Example 3. Example 4. Likewise a gamete is a human cell but is not a human being for much the same reason that a red blood cell is a human cell but is not a human being. Example. You may call the embryo/fetus a parasitic organism if you like, but it is a human parasitic organism - it is a human organism at the start of its life cycle. The gametes are not human organisms, they are human cells. Humans with trisonomy are humans with a mutation/birth defect because they are organisms; if you could mutate a sperm that could survive on its own then you'd have a sperm that was also an organism (and then we could debate whether or not it was a human organism), so good luck with that, but until you do so gametes are not distinct organisms any more than red blood cells are distinct organisms.
Wetekemieluth is offline


Old 04-21-2011, 11:19 PM   #19
TSVIDeo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
416
Senior Member
Default
It was pretty fun, actually. It was one of the only real labs we did in biology. It sounds really impressive, but I was surprised to find out that paternity tests and DNA comparisons are such a simple process. The point of the exercise was analyzing the differentiated DNA but the only part anyone cared about was making the agarose gel
TSVIDeo is offline


Old 04-22-2011, 01:33 AM   #20
JetePlentuara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
It's true that gametes (sperm and ova) are missing a bunch of chromosomes since that's the nature of meiosis, but their missing chromosomes are not the reason that they're not human beings - they're not human beings because they're not viable. If the missing chromosomes were the only reason they weren't human beings then white blood cells would be human beings (since they have all of the necessary chromosomes), and that would be silly.
JetePlentuara is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:53 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity