LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-15-2005, 12:51 AM   #1
SarSerceSaice

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
486
Senior Member
Default Terror in New York
Imagine...


terrorists would throw a nuclear bomb on new yorK!
What would be?

i think that is a very dangerous possibility..............there are many ppl in the arabian world who would like to do that....

what would happen after such a attack???????

world economy would be destroyed?!
SarSerceSaice is offline


Old 12-15-2005, 02:19 AM   #2
aabbaDE

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
329
Senior Member
Default
maybe they do it to germany and then u be destroyed ...
aabbaDE is offline


Old 12-15-2005, 07:06 AM   #3
Lhtfajba

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
532
Senior Member
Default
I doubt any "forum regular's" residents go about their day thinking about this.
Lhtfajba is offline


Old 12-15-2005, 07:16 AM   #4
Talicoabilk

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
I saw a fright-umentary on 20/20 about this a while back. Once I saw the 3D "radius of destruction" graphic that took someone a week to design... I just turned it off. No one's ever pulled off terrorism of that scale (really, we've only had a few successful terror attacks in the U.S., so cancer is a lot scarier to me), and I don't believe humanity has sunk so low yet.
Talicoabilk is offline


Old 12-15-2005, 08:09 AM   #5
affewheillMapew

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
359
Senior Member
Default
maybe they do it to germany and then u be destroyed ...
Thankyou for your sencefull answer in the forum!
affewheillMapew is offline


Old 12-15-2005, 05:07 PM   #6
truttyMab

Join Date
Oct 2005
Location
Malawi
Posts
392
Senior Member
Default
>sigh
truttyMab is offline


Old 01-02-2006, 07:30 AM   #7
JANALA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
Well, if they do you can bet Con Ed'll be ticked 'cause we won't need lights in the dark no more.
JANALA is offline


Old 01-02-2006, 04:25 PM   #8
Petwrenny

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
^^ Stock up on batteries
Petwrenny is offline


Old 01-02-2006, 05:12 PM   #9
Ekzamenov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default
We used to go to home expositions when I was a kid. I remember a bomb shelter exhibit. On the table was a bible, a lit candle, and a big box of Ritz crackers. Funny the things we remember -
Ekzamenov is offline


Old 01-02-2006, 08:13 PM   #10
gymnAnemoe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default
We used to go to home expositions when I was a kid. I remember a bomb shelter exhibit. On the table was a bible, a lit candle, and a big box of Ritz crackers. Funny the things we remember -
lmao

this reminds me of the bomb drills we used to have in elementary school. they used to make us go into the hallway and put our heads between out knees when the drill bell rang. guess it was basically to kiss our asses goodbye, cause it sure wasn't gonna help us live through a nuclear bomb.
gymnAnemoe is offline


Old 01-02-2006, 09:11 PM   #11
ulnanVti

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
564
Senior Member
Default
We had the same thing, but we crouched under desks.

I guess if the nuclear bomb went off in NYC, we'd all be dead.

I wouldn't care much about about the world economy at that point, but thanks for the well-wishes, Stanley.
ulnanVti is offline


Old 01-03-2006, 12:29 AM   #12
neictscek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
I had those in Jr. High. What a joke. Like being under a table was gonna save ya. I think they've stopped those, though. Finally outgrew the 50s mentality that all crisis can be averted by hiding under tables.
neictscek is offline


Old 01-03-2006, 05:54 AM   #13
xiaoselangone

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
542
Senior Member
Default
eh, I somehow doubt anyone is competent enough to pull it off. I mean we are talking about the same guys who wanted their deposit back for the van that they blew up in the WTC in 93. 9/11 was big and bad and blah blah but was it really THAT difficult to do? They attended flight schools to what, bank the airplane? I figure we create our own failures, if we're not stupid about security we'll be safe, and if they nuke NYC and I die I hope Bush does what I think he'd do.
xiaoselangone is offline


Old 01-03-2006, 07:09 AM   #14
xochgtlm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
378
Senior Member
Default
History is loaded with examples of underestimating the enemy.
xochgtlm is offline


Old 01-03-2006, 07:30 AM   #15
SpecialOFFER

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
613
Senior Member
Default
You guys are confusing the sophisticated nuclear bombs developed by countries with the crude dirty bombs made by terrorists groups. From what I understand, the crude bombs don't have the widespread explosive power of the weapons.
They are just regular bombs filled with a radioactive substance. It's likely that most people other than the ones in the immediate vicinity of the blast will survive.
In an article I read just last week (don't remember where though) they say that there is even doubt among the scientific community as to whether those type of crudely made bombs (using uranium) pose as great of a threat as people may fear. These type of bombs are not designed to cause widespread destruction but to spread fear.
SpecialOFFER is offline


Old 01-03-2006, 08:12 AM   #16
lapInsalm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
409
Senior Member
Default
OH MY GOD!!!!

I read this article just now and i am surprised...

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43817

Opinions please!!!

Mix106
lapInsalm is offline


Old 01-03-2006, 01:36 PM   #17
ringsarcle

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
I gave up reading this when they started saying that no one in America would have television service. L.A. would take over immediatly.

Edit: OMG, I am a 'Senior Member'!
ringsarcle is offline


Old 01-03-2006, 04:55 PM   #18
Wmshyrga

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
... those type of crudely made bombs (using uranium) ...
They would use not uranium, but cesium-137 or cobalt-60 that could be found in many medical, industrial, and food irradiators.
Wmshyrga is offline


Old 01-03-2006, 05:02 PM   #19
PebydataFeents

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
372
Senior Member
Default
I read this article just now and i am surprised...

Opinions please!!!
As I will be dead under this scenario my opinion is of little importance.

Retaliation in kind would be the worst possible scenario.

Although -- given the nature of man -- retaliaton and utter destruction is most likely what would take place, leading to the end of the world as we know it.
PebydataFeents is offline


Old 01-03-2006, 05:40 PM   #20
RooxiaNof

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
552
Senior Member
Default
You know, countries like to boast they have enough bombs to blow up the world 20 times or so. Question is, if you can blow up the world with one bomb, what good are the others?
RooxiaNof is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity