[Kafuuil]

This looks awesome but im sure itll suck - art flicks are more oft than not - boring and dry, sadly. But who knows, could be the next clockwork orange.

[SergeyLisin]

Can't wait for this. Looks heavily Kubrick inspired which can only be a good thing in my books.

[Senasivar]

Can't wait for this. Looks heavily Kubrick inspired which can only be a good thing in my books.

I hope it kicks ass, if nothing else itll have inspiring scene2scene transitions
like the iris/hole fade in at about 1:44

[zenihan]

This looks awesome but im sure itll suck - art flicks are more oft than not - boring and dry, sadly. But who knows, could be the next clockwork orange.

Films in general more often than not suck not just art flicks. Also, what's the point of calling a film an "art flick", what the hell is an art flick even ?

I hate it when people dismiss a film by just by labelling it.

There is also no such thing as the "next clockwork orange"

and finally, it's a trailer. You can't really have any idea at all whether the film will be good or not.

[myhackingtosh_ws]

I hope it doesnt suck. I wouldnt make a thread saying it will probably suck if i were dismissing it outright. No - if I were dismissing it outright I'd make a thread saying this movie I've not seen; sucks. I've watched extensive video reviews and interviews (and have probably watched the trailer 30 times) Most people walk out on the movie - it seems to be a love it or hate if film. Thats not a bad sign, but its not a good one either. Art Flicks, or Art House Films - are low budget movies that have great trouble finding distributors. They are typically debut directorials.

As for your "no such thing" remark, have you heard of the terms analogy, semblance or comparison? Lazerbase who also has worked on/with film understood. Of course there will be no "next clockwork orange"; Kubricks dead you fool.

[Alex]

Jesus I wish we were capable of having one damn thread without bickering.