General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#22 |
|
Films are all moving to VFX spectacles.... because they make money. Simple... this is a mindless film with an easy plot for people (who enjoy vfx) to go watch and just switch off and enjoy a film. This was obviously never going to be on the same level as Hugo or The Artist. Its not meant to be.
Most of the VFX in that film you wont even know are there. Shervin, you know EVERY film has a monumental amount of FX in nowadays right? Name a recent film you enjoyed and i can guarantee you that nearly every shot had some sort of VFX or comp done on it. If you dont like in your face VFX then you will not like 90% of the films being released... |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
Films are all moving to VFX spectacles.... because they make money. Simple... this is a mindless film with an easy plot for people (who enjoy vfx) to go watch and just switch off and enjoy a film. This was obviously never going to be on the same level as Hugo or The Artist. Its not meant to be. Look at all the classic movies like westerns... They sets are real, it feels gritty, and I get absorbed into the movie and the setting. Today movies that use effects to display both inside and outside environments just feel so disconnected and annoying. Sure visual effects are good and useful but today it just feels like they use it as a shortcut to bypass the physical labor and creativity required to build a set. Some say visual effects are creative which is true.... but today visual effects dont feel creative... they feel lazy and uninspired. Just feels like a shortcut instead of paying a crew and artists to build and paint a set. For example.. Old Star wars vs Ep 1/2/3 The sets in ep 1/2/3 felt so fake and disconnected while the realism and grittyness of the old Star wars sets made out imaginations soar and absorbed us into the world as we watched the characters develope. While in Ep 1/2/3 we kept watching these vast fake visual effect sets that just felt cold and emotionless. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
I know most movies use visual effects just to display the background period... this is why i like filmed on location movies more in general. Hugo was a film based on reality though... Star wars was not.... it is clear even subconsciously that most of the sets were CG, and had to be. Some times with certain FX and camera angles etc it just wouldn't be possible to build sets (ignoring the time issue). My point is without FX a lot of films would be a lot more dull and uninteresting to the eye. Superhero movies, which are the in thing at the moment, scream FX and "wow the audience" with huge explosions and elaborate fight scenes etc, as that is what they are there to do. I enjoy these films, as i work in the industry, and it is great to see them knowing i have been a part of it in some way, and watched the artists create incredible 3d models, animations and cgfx from nothing. Dont get me wrong. I love to see films like the artist and hugo, coming in a taking all the oscars etc. They deserve it as a master piece of story telling. Some things in this life are just meant to wow us, and that is what Hollywood is trying to do with most films nowadays, for money. I completely understand where some of you are coming from with regards to not liking these films, but i think it is wrong to berate people who do. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
I agree, apparently there isn't any Mars in this one, which surely makes it almost a completely different movie. |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
This has Kate Beckinsdale (yummy) and jessica Biel (double yummy, even if she does have a big arse) to that's for the good - however lousy fight sequences and Colin Farrell seems totally miscast and it's a remake of a bad (with some good bits) movie have also to be considered...
Hmmm, waits for bluray or DVD. |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|