LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-29-2012, 09:11 AM   #21
Promotiona

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
324
Senior Member
Default
Seems you don't live in the US. That's just how it is here, autos are way more common.
Hmm that is unfortunate. I'm sure there will be some about though ? Maybe wait a bit longer until something better comes up.
Promotiona is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 09:13 AM   #22
altosburg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
601
Senior Member
Default
Surely the minority should be automatics ? There cant be that many fools that bought these new as autos as opposed to manuals can there ?!
Traffic city driving, straight wide roads, means the majority of consumer vehicles in US are auto.
altosburg is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 09:20 AM   #23
RIjdrVs3

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
522
Senior Member
Default
Traffic city driving, straight wide roads, means the majority of consumer vehicles in US are auto.
Yep. Not sure why so many Europeans find this surprising... perhaps they don't drive 60 miles to work each day?
RIjdrVs3 is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 09:22 AM   #24
zueqhbyhp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
Traffic city driving, straight wide roads, means the majority of consumer vehicles in US are auto.
Yeah I see your point. For family saloons and grand tourers and big trucks etc. Then yea auto is probably the best option. But for things like imprezas, supras, RSX. And the forester i would have thought manual would have been the most common option picked, just because the owner of those types of vehicles would be buying them for the fact they weren't just using the vehicle as a high mileage long range commuting vehicle all the time.

I have personally owned a automatic bmw 850 and tbh it was perfectly suited to that car because of its GT nature, big fast A to B vehicle. But a smaller more highly strung fun car like a forester should be manual imo.

But i guess it is what it is.
zueqhbyhp is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 09:34 AM   #25
biannaruh

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
When I think forester, I think "soccer mom" or close to. The reason? Because that is who I see driving them. They are just a slightly cooler "minivan" in most cases for most of US. And women here hate effort... I mean standards.
biannaruh is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 09:38 AM   #26
NumStulpata

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
When I think forester, I think "soccer mom" or close to. The reason? Because that is who I see driving them. They are just a slightly cooler "minivan" in most cases for most of US. And women here hate effort... I mean standards.
This is true.
NumStulpata is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 09:45 AM   #27
whimpykid

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
611
Senior Member
Default
When I think forester, I think "soccer mom" or close to. The reason? Because that is who I see driving them. They are just a slightly cooler "minivan" in most cases for most of US. And women here hate effort... I mean standards.
When I see one, I think about stuff like this.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv2Q0F4BYSA

And how relatively cheaply it can be done.
whimpykid is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 09:47 AM   #28
Rchzygnc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
366
Senior Member
Default
Driving a manual is useless except in very few situations. Europeans need to stop justifying how awesome it is and realize it is a big waste of time.
Rchzygnc is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 09:59 AM   #29
AdvertisingPo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
I could also understand if the vehicle was fast. The Forester really isn't that fast. It is a 6second vehicle with only 225hp. Pretty much all the V6 mid-sized sedans are as fast or faster these days.

It is there for people who don't want to hit 60 in 8 seconds or more. Get a little more kick. Even old people want some kick. Even Buick offered supercharged models back in the 90's and early 2000s.
AdvertisingPo is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 10:00 AM   #30
mynaflzak

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
558
Senior Member
Default
Driving a manual is useless except in very few situations. Europeans need to stop justifying how awesome it is and realize it is a big waste of time.
Blasphemy, you come to PA where we have hills and turns and enjoy your pathetic automatic transmission struggling to find the right gear.
mynaflzak is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 10:09 AM   #31
ViaxobbimeVar

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
437
Senior Member
Default
Blasphemy, you come to PA where we have hills and turns and enjoy your pathetic automatic transmission struggling to find the right gear.
Well, that depends on the auto. I like Subaru autos, with my old Legacy I loved the auto, 4:11 final drive in that car, LSD, and a much better F/R ratio for regular driving. I live in PA too, and while I love driving a manual an auto is nice around here. I'm just bummed that Subaru has kinda turned to **** recently.
ViaxobbimeVar is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 10:21 AM   #32
sterofthemasteool

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
http://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-s...18375348&Log=0

Buy that. Don't argue with me, just do it.
I miss my SRT. Stupid woman in a Range Rover and an unsafe left turn. Bah..
sterofthemasteool is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 10:31 AM   #33
trorseIrripsy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
Well, that depends on the auto. I like Subaru autos, with my old Legacy I loved the auto, 4:11 final drive in that car, LSD, and a much better F/R ratio for regular driving. I live in PA too, and while I love driving a manual an auto is nice around here. I'm just bummed that Subaru has kinda turned to **** recently.
I've been driving a 95 Impreza Auto, I wasn't altogether disappointed, but it got a little weird on hills sometimes, it and my outback both had 4.11's, the outback was a 5 speed though.

I don't know, I just have more fun with a manual myself.

I miss the 4.11's though, my Legacy has 3.97 final drive, also with a LSD, and while I am impressed with the velocity it will hit, I'd give it up for that snappiness back.

I'd ditch my transmission but I was told it's "special", something has been done to it. Not sure what.
trorseIrripsy is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 10:50 AM   #34
voodoosdv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, that white one is down the tube. Didn't like my offer and seems like wont go lower than $8k.

The one with $120k miles I will see about pursing and I found a Jeep Cherokee for $5.9k with 111k miles Im going to see about. That is 4x4 with the NP242 t-case.
voodoosdv is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 11:00 AM   #35
Gorlummm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, that white one is down the tube. Didn't like my offer and seems like wont go lower than $8k.

The one with $120k miles I will see about pursing and I found a Jeep Cherokee for $5.9k with 111k miles Im going to see about. That is 4x4 with the NP242 t-case.
Do not buy the Jeep, be smart. You are better off without that white Subie. 120K is OKish, not great though. Subaru is still a decent brand, but they are not as reliable as they were.
Gorlummm is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 11:27 AM   #36
asharbiq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
558
Senior Member
Default
I don't know why you need an SUV/cross over anyways. It's not like you get lots of snow or anything. With gas rising it would be silly to buy something to inefficient. Not to mention all those vehicles are rather expensive for the mileage they have on them.
asharbiq is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 11:51 AM   #37
MasTaBlau

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default
Where we do go does get snow. Hitting the trails is always fun. Tons of trails around here. More cargo room is better for a family. Easier to get in and out as well as the kid. Being able to tow is a plus.
Gas really isn't much of a concern. So long as it isn't my DD. Buick gets 30mpg for my commute and road trips.

Small cars are totally out of the question. Way to tiny, generally really slow and just not much on an n/a 4 banger fan. I've looked at some Regal GS and test drove one but no luck.
MasTaBlau is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 01:58 PM   #38
wallyfindme

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
609
Senior Member
Default
Driving a manual is useless except in very few situations. Europeans need to stop justifying how awesome it is and realize it is a big waste of time.
I suggest you learn to use the clutch when changing gear, you'll find it makes a great deal of difference to the driving experience.
As a general rule, those interested in driving use a manual, those who just regard it as a task to be made as simple as possible use automatics.
wallyfindme is offline


Old 03-29-2012, 02:42 PM   #39
triardwonvada

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
I suggest you learn to use the clutch when changing gear, you'll find it makes a great deal of difference to the driving experience.
As a general rule, those interested in driving use a manual, those who just regard it as a task to be made as simple as possible use automatics.
Unfortunately he's right. Automatics generally make more sense these days, especially with manual shift paddle'. In Europe the majority of cars sold are diesel, this makes auto's even more apt as they have a narrow power band.

I enjoy driving a manual, but having driven a few newer auto's you can be sure this will be my transmission of choice in the future.

What differences does the clutch make these days do you think? In the real world I mean, not on a track.

EDIT: In the US, buying a manual is mainly just making unnecessary work for yourself. Do you often do that?

--- Post Update ---

Surely the minority should be automatics ? There cant be that many fools that bought these new as autos as opposed to manuals can there ?!
I have driven extensively in the US (mostly as a passenger) and there really is incredibly little point to a manual gearbox almost everywhere.
triardwonvada is offline


Old 03-30-2012, 12:24 AM   #40
xquFzpNw

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default


I have driven extensively in the US (mostly as a passenger) and there really is incredibly little point to a manual gearbox almost everywhere.
Sorry but the way you worded that makes me think of one of these. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Casdon-214-T...3038047&sr=8-1
xquFzpNw is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity