General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
If you twist the definition of mutual funds to mean an open-ended fund, then yes it's a mutual fund. Don't work in computers at all after receiving your Comp Sci degree and see how much you can remember accurately on the spot after 3 years. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Calling ETFs mutual funds is an abuse of terminology.
As to the original question, it depends how long you're going to hold the position and how much you're putting in. The standard wisdom is that the ETF costs you less to hold while the fund costs you less to enter and leave. The biggest difference in asset management land (for investors who do not qualify to buy into hedge funds) is between active management and passive management. Relative to that, the cost difference between an index ETF and the equivalent mutual fund is likely to be pretty small. As always, though, shop around for the best deal. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Calling ETFs mutual funds is an abuse of terminology. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
I'm a lazy investor, so my money started in mutual funds and stayed there even when I got enough to possibly justify moving it to ETF's. However, Vanguard (where I have my mutual funds) significantly lowers the management fees once you pass a certain investment threshold, which when coupled with the capital gains I'd have to pay from moving money around justifies keeping the money where it is.
ETF's aren't an option for my 401K - there my only option is whether to put the money in a small, medium, or large-cap index fund, so I went 30/30/40. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Past performance is no guarantee. Also, I'd look favorably on buying an index fund that had been dropping. That 1.74% drop is more of a discount than a liability. I know past performance is no guarantee, but I'm also looking at future potential growth. As Canada is an energy & commodity economy predominately, I see it growing faster than the US in general, just as it has the past decade. China and the developing world has enormous appetite for Canadian goods and energy and the demand will only keep increasing. It's getting to the point that it won't even matter if the US decides they don't want "dirty" Canadian oil, China is begging for more. I think the US' heydeys are behind it for leading growth. I'd already have a combined 40% invested in the US, I think that's more than enough. Don't want to put all of my begs in one massively indebted basket. ![]() Additionally, US funds carry increased risk for me as I have the currency issue to deal with. The US/Canadian currency is fluctuating significantly these days, which can be very good or very bad. It's needless additional risk to put lots more money into that, I would think. A 20% currency differential one year can wipe out 20% gains... |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
In addition to KH's comments, I note that sometimes mutual funds are harder to get into and out of than ETFs because mutual funds settle at the end of the day. During the meltdown a couple of years ago, I was delayed a few days in moving money from one fund to another. Almost always, this is no big deal, but volatility was enormous at the time, and I lost something on the order of 5% by that friction.
Another consideration is that ETFs sometimes act a little strangely if there is low trading volume, if I recall correctly. This argues for keeping to some of the bigger ETFs. Good luck. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
The $3000 minimum is just for the initial purchase. After that, you can buy in small dollar amounts. I don't know any good funds that track the TSX. It looks pretty good to me...my dad's had it the past ~6 years and it's treated him very well. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|