LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-02-2011, 12:40 AM   #1
DarrenBent

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default Tax Religious Groups
Yes, they ought to be taxed. God would want it that way. We are all God's children, we should be treated the same way by God's Instrument of Government.
DarrenBent is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 12:45 AM   #2
ppfpooghn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
I think the op makes a good point. Why are religions exempt from taxes, especially in a recession?
ppfpooghn is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 12:52 AM   #3
brorialsibers

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
Yes, tax them. God told me you should render unto caesar what is caesars.
brorialsibers is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 01:15 AM   #4
Narus63

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
383
Senior Member
Default
Well-said, HC. DaShi is just providing another opportunity to work the atheists into yet another frenzy. Like it matters.
Narus63 is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 01:32 AM   #5
gDGwm8BC

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
563
Senior Member
Default
I agree with the OP, they should be taxed just like all nonprofits.
They can feel free to operate a charity separate from their church.
gDGwm8BC is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 01:43 AM   #6
moopierof

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
519
Senior Member
Default
They can feel free to operate a charity separate from their church.
And preaching and the building the preaching occurs in is of course charity, so sounds fine in theory.

JM
moopierof is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 01:50 AM   #7
w3QHxwNb

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
And preaching and the building the preaching occurs in is of course charity, so sounds fine in theory.

JM
I have a hard time seeing how taxing churches would adversely affect the quality of preaching.
w3QHxwNb is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 01:53 AM   #8
Rqqneujr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
533
Senior Member
Default
I have a hard time seeing how taxing churches would adversely affect the quality of preaching.
Since you are an atheist (at least I presume you are), it's really not fair for you to judge since you don't believe preaching has any quality whatsoever.
Rqqneujr is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 02:10 AM   #9
Ad0i89Od

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
374
Senior Member
Default
Since you are an atheist (at least I presume you are), it's really not fair for you to judge since you don't believe preaching has any quality whatsoever.
Interesting, if bizarre, assumption.
Ad0i89Od is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 02:35 AM   #10
PrettyFifa12

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
In the first place, more goes on through a church than "preaching".
PrettyFifa12 is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 02:59 AM   #11
SHpuntik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
608
Senior Member
Default
Not really, seeing as he voted religion as being "fake" in the real or fake poll.
I meant the statement as a whole. B does not necessarily follow from A.
SHpuntik is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 04:33 AM   #12
Jifyicyfuhpop

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
448
Senior Member
Default
At what point can Apple declare itself a religion and avoid taxes?

I'm fairly sure people, in general, have far more faith in Steve Jobs than God.
Jifyicyfuhpop is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 05:14 AM   #13
Wdlglivi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
338
Senior Member
Default
Except that they are already charities. Which should be taxed.
Should charities be taxed?

Slap a tax on donations to feed the hungry. There will be less revenue to feed the starving. They will die quicker so less starving people but I guess that is there own fault so they deserved it. What do you reckon about cutting the taxes for the rich and making up the shortfall taxing charities and churchs.
:sarcasm:

taxing charities
Wdlglivi is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 08:04 AM   #14
CedssypeEdids

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
692
Senior Member
Default
For sure. Religion and politics have never intertwined.
CedssypeEdids is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 10:53 AM   #15
ketNavatutt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
512
Senior Member
Default
Yes, taxing charities seems kind of unproductive, unless you assume that the government could provide the same service cheaper or better.
But religion's functions are not 100% charities so they shouldn't be 100% tax free.
ketNavatutt is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 05:26 PM   #16
Hodstcopter

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
It seems like the ACLU has spent more money begging Kuciwalker for additional donations than he provided in donations
Hodstcopter is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 11:03 PM   #17
HsSp82U8

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
Yes, taxing charities seems kind of unproductive, unless you assume that the government could provide the same service cheaper or better.
But religion's functions are not 100% charities so they shouldn't be 100% tax free.
There is no way you would ever get the religious to agree to a % that is pure charity. To their mind the whole thing is charity. We've had this debate here before.

I say tax them like any other business and avoid the argument.
HsSp82U8 is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 11:40 PM   #18
beenBinybelia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
It's a very strange business that accepts donations but doesn't require payment for the vast majority of services rendered...
beenBinybelia is offline


Old 03-02-2011, 11:46 PM   #19
RadcliffXX

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
636
Senior Member
Default
The worst is that sometimes it's not donations but Tithes.
RadcliffXX is offline


Old 03-03-2011, 12:47 AM   #20
Kamendoriks

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
627
Senior Member
Default
Isn't a tithe just another word for a voluntary donation?

There's no legal obligation is there?
Kamendoriks is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity