General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
I think they are trying to regulate what the owners of the last miles can do to people who do not have a lot of choices.
The significant issue in Canada recently was the major ISPs (telcos and cable cos) were trying to force independents to charge extra for things like netflix. They needed this to be able to charge the fees themselves, or large numbers of people would bolt to the indies. |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
It also depends how they write the law.
There could very well be a reasonable provision that upon FCC approval, they can implement QoS/paid prioritization for types of services rather than per specific providers. Fact remains that some kind of insurance that the information continues to flow freely and without bias is required. The internet is far too powerful and ubiquitous to be completely controlled by questionable corporate interests of a few cableco/telcos, especially given their history of abuse. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
It also depends how they write the law. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|