Lefty CHOKES again - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**8IhGpvH0** · 07-15-2007, 07:14 PM

http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/news/story?id=2937333

**spravka.ua** · 07-15-2007, 07:17 PM

Damn, at least he is #1 in choking.

**Qeiafib** · 07-15-2007, 07:35 PM

Damn, at least he is #1 in choking.

Wouldn't Greg Norman rank ahead of him?

**Pete789** · 07-15-2007, 07:38 PM

Wouldn't Greg Norman rank ahead of him?

I believe Phil has got him topped on more memorable chokes.

**kneexyFreedly** · 07-15-2007, 08:32 PM

I believe Phil has got him topped on more memorable chokes.

yeah it sucks being the second best player in the world.

**Kinds Of Pain Meds** · 07-15-2007, 08:33 PM

yeah it sucks being the second best player in the world.

Ima sure Phil is shooting for Wins on Sunday

Not chokejobs on 18

**Arbinknit** · 07-15-2007, 08:35 PM

Ima sure Phil is shooting for Wins on Sunday

Not chokejobs on 18

i'm sure he'll take the second place money and not feel to shitty about losing a tourney no one outside of scotland gives a shit about.

**wp6Eg2Fm** · 07-15-2007, 08:36 PM

i'm sure he'll take the second place money and not feel to shitty about losing a tourney no one outside of scotland gives a shit about.

So you think he feels ok with choking away a win and TONS of money?

Ummm ok got ya.

**LeaderBiz** · 07-15-2007, 08:38 PM

Choking this away and heading to the British next week

Pressure is on

**Bromymbollile** · 07-15-2007, 08:38 PM

So you think he feels ok with choking away a win and TONS of money?
Ummm ok got ya.

you think losing the scottish is a huge deal to him. got ya.

again, i'm sure he's content being the best player in the world not named tiger.

**Prarnenoexpog** · 07-15-2007, 08:39 PM

you think losing the scottish is a huge deal to him. got ya.

again, i'm sure he's content being the best player in the world not named tiger.

Ima sure he plays to be #1 and to win

I never said its a HUGE deal

But it matters

**HawksBurnDown** · 07-15-2007, 08:42 PM

Ima sure he plays to be #1 and to win

I never said its a HUGE deal

But it matters

right, you definitely weren't implying that it was a huge deal.

**appletango** · 07-15-2007, 08:43 PM

right, you definitely weren't implying that it was a huge deal.

Certainly wasnt

Just said once again he choked

And on a small stage

Wonder what will happen when it matters

**Avaindimik** · 07-15-2007, 08:45 PM

Certainly wasnt

Just said once again he choked

And on a small stage

Wonder what will happen when it matters

you certainly were.

**iceleliewBync** · 07-15-2007, 08:46 PM

maybe not the biggest tourney in the world, but it certainly had some good players there. i am more than sure he is pissed. you think after making all the money he has made, he cares about anything but winning? not a chance. he prolly already lost that money from this tourney at the nearest casino.

**VrQsgM7c** · 07-15-2007, 10:55 PM

First define choke, then look and see how many tournaments Tiger has won when not leading on the final day.

Then look up Jack Nicklaus' stats.

**MeverikcNils** · 07-15-2007, 10:59 PM

First define choke, then look and see how many tournaments Tiger has won when not leading on the final day.

Then look up Jack Nicklaus' stats.

why does this have anything to do with tiger or jack? i really dont think this was a choke job. its not like he was blowing people away from what i can see. i consider a choke something that norman or van de velde did. not what mickelson did.

**CesseOveldset** · 07-15-2007, 11:03 PM

First define choke, then look and see how many tournaments Tiger has won when not leading on the final day.

Then look up Jack Nicklaus' stats.

that's my favorite part about when the commentators bring up how the top players never come from behind to beat tiger on sunday. he never comes from behind to beat anyone on sunday.

**QbCp7LaZ** · 07-15-2007, 11:05 PM

that's my favorite part about when the commentators bring up how the top players never come from behind to beat tiger on sunday. he never comes from behind to beat anyone on sunday.

sure he has. just not in a major. but this is about phil and this tourney. which wasnt a choke. not about anyone else.

**Cerilopasei** · 07-15-2007, 11:06 PM

why does this have anything to do with tiger or jack? i really dont think this was a choke job. its not like he was blowing people away from what i can see. i consider a choke something that norman or van de velde did. not what mickelson did.

Due to the thread title I suppose.

Norman got beat by some pretty damn good shots. I'm sure he choked a few away, but give the winners their due.

Van de Velde, yes that is a true picture of choke.

07-15-2007, 07:14 PM	#1
8IhGpvH0 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 341 Senior Member	Lefty CHOKES again http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/news/story?id=2937333 Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 07:17 PM	#2
spravka.ua Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 408 Senior Member	Damn, at least he is #1 in choking. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 07:35 PM	#3
Qeiafib Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 526 Senior Member	Damn, at least he is #1 in choking. Wouldn't Greg Norman rank ahead of him? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 07:38 PM	#4
Pete789 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 536 Senior Member	Wouldn't Greg Norman rank ahead of him? I believe Phil has got him topped on more memorable chokes. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:32 PM	#5
kneexyFreedly Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 372 Senior Member	I believe Phil has got him topped on more memorable chokes. yeah it sucks being the second best player in the world. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:33 PM	#6
Kinds Of Pain Meds Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 436 Senior Member	yeah it sucks being the second best player in the world. Ima sure Phil is shooting for Wins on Sunday Not chokejobs on 18 Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:35 PM	#7
Arbinknit Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 458 Senior Member	Ima sure Phil is shooting for Wins on Sunday Not chokejobs on 18 i'm sure he'll take the second place money and not feel to shitty about losing a tourney no one outside of scotland gives a shit about. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:36 PM	#8
wp6Eg2Fm Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 531 Senior Member	i'm sure he'll take the second place money and not feel to shitty about losing a tourney no one outside of scotland gives a shit about. So you think he feels ok with choking away a win and TONS of money? Ummm ok got ya. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:38 PM	#9
LeaderBiz Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 357 Senior Member	Choking this away and heading to the British next week Pressure is on Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:38 PM	#10
Bromymbollile Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 529 Senior Member	So you think he feels ok with choking away a win and TONS of money? Ummm ok got ya. you think losing the scottish is a huge deal to him. got ya. again, i'm sure he's content being the best player in the world not named tiger. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:39 PM	#11
Prarnenoexpog Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 355 Senior Member	you think losing the scottish is a huge deal to him. got ya. again, i'm sure he's content being the best player in the world not named tiger. Ima sure he plays to be #1 and to win I never said its a HUGE deal But it matters Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:42 PM	#12
HawksBurnDown Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 695 Senior Member	Ima sure he plays to be #1 and to win I never said its a HUGE deal But it matters right, you definitely weren't implying that it was a huge deal. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:43 PM	#13
appletango Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 455 Senior Member	right, you definitely weren't implying that it was a huge deal. Certainly wasnt Just said once again he choked And on a small stage Wonder what will happen when it matters Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:45 PM	#14
Avaindimik Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 515 Senior Member	Certainly wasnt Just said once again he choked And on a small stage Wonder what will happen when it matters you certainly were. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 08:46 PM	#15
iceleliewBync Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 605 Senior Member	maybe not the biggest tourney in the world, but it certainly had some good players there. i am more than sure he is pissed. you think after making all the money he has made, he cares about anything but winning? not a chance. he prolly already lost that money from this tourney at the nearest casino. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

07-15-2007, 10:55 PM	#16
VrQsgM7c Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 511 Senior Member	First define choke, then look and see how many tournaments Tiger has won when not leading on the final day. Then look up Jack Nicklaus' stats. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 10:59 PM	#17
MeverikcNils Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 302 Senior Member	First define choke, then look and see how many tournaments Tiger has won when not leading on the final day. Then look up Jack Nicklaus' stats. why does this have anything to do with tiger or jack? i really dont think this was a choke job. its not like he was blowing people away from what i can see. i consider a choke something that norman or van de velde did. not what mickelson did. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 11:03 PM	#18
CesseOveldset Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 550 Senior Member	First define choke, then look and see how many tournaments Tiger has won when not leading on the final day. Then look up Jack Nicklaus' stats. that's my favorite part about when the commentators bring up how the top players never come from behind to beat tiger on sunday. he never comes from behind to beat anyone on sunday. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 11:05 PM	#19
QbCp7LaZ Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 490 Senior Member	that's my favorite part about when the commentators bring up how the top players never come from behind to beat tiger on sunday. he never comes from behind to beat anyone on sunday. sure he has. just not in a major. but this is about phil and this tourney. which wasnt a choke. not about anyone else. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

07-15-2007, 11:06 PM	#20
Cerilopasei Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 463 Senior Member	why does this have anything to do with tiger or jack? i really dont think this was a choke job. its not like he was blowing people away from what i can see. i consider a choke something that norman or van de velde did. not what mickelson did. Due to the thread title I suppose. Norman got beat by some pretty damn good shots. I'm sure he choked a few away, but give the winners their due. Van de Velde, yes that is a true picture of choke. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote