[Gaxiciverfere]

As a newsreader on Fox news, Megyn Kelly is the epitome of class and restraint.

But the 40-year-old cut a very different figure when she appeared in the December issue of GQ magazine.

Wearing black lingerie and with her tousled hair tumbling down around her shoulders, the blue-eyed blonde looked like a sex kitten as she posed for the revealing shoot.

Kelly, who recently announced that she is expecting her second child in April, is the only TV news representative to be featured in the annual issue.

But she is certainly more than just a pretty face.

According to the magazine, Kelly's beauty and intelligence have made her the face of Fox News.

'Abhorred by the left, adored by the right, frequently pinata’d by The Daily Show, Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly has become the very blonde face—and legs—of the network. And she’s okay with that,' they say.

Kelly admitted that she gets plenty of fan mail, as well as plenty of criticism.

She says: 'Some of them just say, "You’re hot” — which, you know, I don’t find insulting. But the ones that go a little over the top get deleted right away.'

Kelly married Douglas Brunt, the President and CEO of Authentium after her first marriage ended in divorce in 2006.

She gave birth to her first child Edward Yates Brunt in September 2009, and is expecting her second in April of 2011.

Before joining Fox News, Kelly worked as an associate for Bickel & Brewer LLP in Chicago, and practiced as a lawyer with Jones Day in New York City, Washington D.C. and Chicago.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...ine-shoot.html

(somebody be a pal and post the pics for me, please...)

[Pataacculakp]

Sorry, wrinkly knees don't do much for me (yes, I know I'm too much of a perfectionist)......Ben

[BCVB9SOc]

Sorry, wrinkly knees don't do much for me (yes, I know I'm too much of a perfectionist)......Ben

Naw...post the sexy pics. OR I'll make sure Binky NEVER goes anywhere with you.

[poulaMahmah]

Naw...post the sexy pics. OR I'll make sure Binky NEVER goes anywhere with you.

Oops!!...

[illiniastibly]

using sex to get around the truth works quite well.

Spreading lies and misinformation will be allowed as long as you look good doing it.

[EspanaCamsInfo]

using sex to get around the truth works quite well.

Spreading lies and misinformation will be allowed as long as you look good doing it.

What.............?

[Gilowero]

using sex to get around the truth works quite well.

Spreading lies and misinformation will be allowed as long as you look good doing it.

The thread is just about her pics, nothing else.
How do you like the pics? Think she's pretty?

[DoctorQuquriramba]

"Newsreader". Appropriate description for her.

[ibiDb4uu]

I wouldn't look down on her too much, PR. I'll bet her paycheck is sweet.

[timmybrown]

I wouldn't look down on her too much, PR. I'll bet her paycheck is sweet.

Big deal. That's only admirable to people who value money over principles. She's a reader, not a journalist. Her looks are why she was hired - to READ. We don't need actual journalists on TV anymore because our networks don't report the news. They broadcast infotainment.

[viawbambutt]

The thread is just about her pics, nothing else.
How do you like the pics? Think she's pretty?

The pictures are nice... and yes she is pretty.

Im more of a substance type of guy though.... it takes more than a pretty face to stir me up.

[masterso]

Exactly why am I supposed to care about the pics? Is this woman a news anchor or a model?

"epitome of class and restraint"

all evidence to the contrary.

[immelawealecy]

The pictures are nice... and yes she is pretty.

Im more of a substance type of guy though.... it takes more than a pretty face to stir me up.

She's an attorney and quite intelligent. But you stick with your sexist shtick of beautiful = dumb.

That's very telling in itself.

[fereupfer]

Exactly why am I supposed to care about the pics? Is this woman a news anchor or a model?

"epitome of class and restraint"

all evidence to the contrary.

Then you've obviously never watched her.

[JTS_tv]

Then you've obviously never watched her.

I've seen enough.
What difference does it make ultimately? She's such a serious journalist reporting news, that she takes her clothes off.

Got it.

hey, at least it wasn't Hannity, I detest vomiting.

[nAKMzyBN]

Stupid Shit Megyn Kelly Has Said:

February 27, 2010 12:00 PM

Megyn Kelly says if a doctor chopped off her arm, it wouldn't be a big deal because it ain't worth a damn!

By John Amato

The obsession Republicans have with lawsuits and the amount of money someone should receive if they win a case is very perplexing and disingenuous to me. I mean, they are the first people to use lawyers and sue you, like Fox News did to Al Franken over a book. But during the Obama health-care summit, I heard more garbage about "tort reform" from the Republicans as if it will cure our ailing health-care system. (Sen. Dick Durbin dispelled that myth perfectly, by the way.)

But that was just a drop in the bucket compared to the garbage we get served up on a daily basis from the media elite pundits who take to our airwaves and say the most insipid things to defend their positions. Fox News' Megyn Kelly earlier this week gave probably the most ludicrous argument against trial lawyers and for tort reform than anyone I've ever seen. She sacrificed her arm for the cause. For some reason, if malpractice cases disappeared, suddenly health care premiums would majestically be reduced.

Kelly was discussing tort reform with Debbie Wassermann-Schultz and dove into the twilight zone by arguing that if her arm was cut off, it really wasn't worth all that much as long as you can still function. And what the hell? It's only an arm. I mean how much of an impact does it have on your life if you lose one arm, because you have a back up, right?

Kelly: this is a CNN poll and thy ask people about tort reform and 66% of those asked said they favor limiting the amount of money patients can get if they win a medical malpractice lawsuit. 66 % want that. 33 % don't want that. Why can't there be an agreement on tort reform?

Schultz: They support that until it's them or their family member that is injured in a medical malpractice suit and then the poll numbers change.

Kelly: You just have to limit the economic damage, in other words you, if a doctor cuts my arm off. I can get the money back from what my life is to live like without this arm so I can function. You can't get punitive damages.

WTF? How does a person figure out how much one of my limbs is worth? And then I'm not allowed to get punitive damages because I don't deserve it? Are you confused?

You know, if some moron of a doctor cut off my arm through incompetence, not only would I want to get enough money to make my life whole, I would want to make sure the doctor paid a price too, just to try to assure it didn't happen to anyone else. It might not put him out of business, but it would take a piece out of his hide that he would never forget.

Maybe we should have Kelly draw up a diagram of a body and then monetize each part as it relates to how a person functions. She could then pass it on to Michael Steele, Sarah Palin and the teabaggers, because I'm sure they would argue that one foot is only worth about thirty three hundred dollars and sixteen cents.

Why would anyone care if I won $10 million dollars from a f*&king doctor if he cut my leg off and I sued his ass because he was supposed to only drain a little fluid out of my knee? This is the kind of crap Republicans argue for on Fox News every day, and conservative pundits on all the channels spew regularly. They really are ethically bankrupt.

http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato...or-chopped-her

And this little gem....

Megyn Kelly Challenges Britney Spears To A Cat Fight
Reported by Ellen - March 19, 2009 - Comments (27)

Guest blogged by Julie

So, okay, I have to admit I missed Megyn Kelly’s big Fox News Obscenity Police Show (a/k/a Kelly’s Court) last January, blasting Britney Spears for the “f**k message in her song If You Seek Amy. And after watching Kelly on the March 17th America’s Newsroom acting like she and Spears were Jon Stewart and Jim Cramer because Spears, in turn, supposedly mocked Kelly in her If You Seek Amy music video, I have to admit that I had a very strong reaction: Who gives a If You Seek A about any of this? And why is it that the Foxettes seem to most frequently bare their claws for attractive, outspoken females -- over nothing? (Check out the claw-baring against Meghan McCain.). With video.

For those just tuning in, in January, Kelly slammed Spears on her “Kelly’s Court” broadcast for the obscene message in If You Seek Amy. They’re actually very creative lyrics, like them or not. Playing a clip of the song with the words “If You Seek Amy“ bleeped out, Kelly intoned in her I‘m-A-Sexy-Schoolmarm voice, “If you say it quickly with no space between the letters it basically spells out the F-word, and then me.” (Don’t try this at home, boys and girls -- I did this about ten times and had to watch the whole video to see what she meant. Watch it here. Kelly was outraged in a way only a Foxette could get outraged, you know, sort of like an enraged butterfly.

So, next up Brittney. At the beginning and end of her music video of If You Seek Amy, a blonde anchor mocks Kelly, repeating part of her broadcast word for word.

The beginning and end of a stupid little spat, right? I mean, Megyn Kelly is kind of older, and she’s a lawyer and all. No such luck.

On her Tuesday show, Kelly, obviously excited to have caught the attention of such an important pop star, chortled and cackled with self-importance about Spears’ video making fun of her. (Not something I would personally want broadcast all over the airwaves, but that’s just me.) The OMG moment was when Kelly held her hands up in claws and did the catty meow, telling Spears to “bring it.”

Did she really say “bring it?“ It’s amazing that someone like Kelly, who obviously would like to be taken seriously as either a lawyer or a journalist, would waste time with this. Does she now only want to be taken seriously as an empty blonde bimbo shell? Has being a Foxette on Fox News left her so bereft of self-respect that she thinks it makes sense to challenge Spears, literally, to a catfight? Claws bared and all? All I can say is, good luck with that being taken seriously part.

Incidentally, there’s no shortage of obscenity on the airwaves, and if you Google “You Tube subliminal messages” you get all sorts of stuff.

Why Spears? Why didn’t Kelly go after Three 6 Mafia - I Stay Fly (first, Three 6 supposedly means Satan, and rumor has it that if you play the song in reverse it mentions the devil). That would have been perfect for the Christian Right Network. And how about the song “Laffy Taffy” by D4L? It isn’t about candy - in fact, it is rumored that song is about the female genitalia. The song “Milkshake” isn’t an ode to Baskin Robbins. And, of course (more in her age range), the Beatles White Album was supposedly subliminal all over the place.

So what’s up with the Foxettes? First, Laura Ingraham and Andrea Tantaros cattily attack Meghan McCain. Then Ingraham attacks McCain again in an e-mail. Now, Kelly’s doing battle as the obscenity police over a pop star whose main selling point is her sexuality. The Foxettes are clearly unhinged these days, and I’m suspecting it’s Michelle Obama’s smoothly muscled arms that’s stirring up the big green monster. Stay tuned for more . . . Maybe Greta van Susteren will challenge Lil’ Kim to a rap battle.

http://www.newshounds.us/2009/03/19/..._cat_fight.php

Of course there's more. SO much more.....

[Peapeuddedbaw]

She's an attorney and quite intelligent. But you stick with your sexist shtick of beautiful = dumb.

That's very telling in itself.

Hmmm... dont think I called her dumb Mint..... those were your words... dont project.

She lacks substance because she is just as willing to read the truth as she is to read a lie..... She gets paid for her looks not her intelligence.... they often play dumb on Faux News.

Having no substance does not = dumb

[ancexttew]

Hmmm... dont think I called her dumb Mint..... those were your words... dont project.

She lacks substance because she is just as willing to read the truth as she is to read a lie..... She gets paid for her looks not her intelligence.... they often play dumb on Faux News.

Having no substance does not = dumb

Too late for backpedaling now. You implied she was dumb because of her looks. That's a typical male response, trying to make yourself feel superior. Believe it or not, not every woman with looks is stupid. That's another stereotype born from male bigots like you.

[Grennios]

I meant for this thread to be light, but people are so hateful. And why?
You don't like FOX? Gotta spew hate?

Some of you spend a lot of time writing vile hateful things about anyone on FOX, and Palin. Obsession....

Do we on the right spew daily about Olberman? Maddow, Soros? NO.

Cuz we don't care. We are not obsessed with newscasters. Y'all look so silly doing this every damn day.

Issues, people, ISSUES. Remember ISSUES???

[espabamar]

I meant for this thread to be light, but people are so hateful. And why?
You don't like FOX? Gotta spew hate?

Some of you spend a lot of time writing vile hateful things about anyone on FOX, and Palin. Obsession....

Do we on the right spew daily about Olberman? Maddow, Soros? NO.

Cuz we don't care. We are not obsessed with newscasters. Y'all look so silly doing this every damn day.

Issues, people, ISSUES. Remember ISSUES???

Poor Trinn!
Attachment 1876