DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/index.php)
-   Science Forum (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=75)
-   -   mmmmh (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139012)

Penisvergroesserung 09-07-2012 02:30 PM

mmmmh
 
http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/ne...siblefroms.jpg
[I]This colour view of the parachute and back shell that helped deliver NASA's Curiosity rover to the surface of the Red Planet was taken by the High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/ne...siblefroms.jpg
Tracks from the first drives of NASA's Curiosity rover are visible in this image captured by the High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. The rover is seen where the tracks end. The image's colour has been enhanced to show the surface details better. The two marks seen near the site where the rover landed formed when reddish surface dust was blown away by the rover's descent stage, revealing darker basaltic sands underneath. Similarly, the tracks appear darker where the rover's wheels disturbed the top layer of dust.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2012-09-visible...-mars.html#jCp


Wondering why the Moon is so difficult... can't be much sunshine there ????

gennickhif 09-07-2012 02:47 PM

Quote:

http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/ne...siblefroms.jpg
[I]This colour view of the parachute and back shell that helped deliver NASA's Curiosity rover to the surface of the Red Planet was taken by the High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/ne...siblefroms.jpg
Tracks from the first drives of NASA's Curiosity rover are visible in this image captured by the High-Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. The rover is seen where the tracks end. The image's colour has been enhanced to show the surface details better. The two marks seen near the site where the rover landed formed when reddish surface dust was blown away by the rover's descent stage, revealing darker basaltic sands underneath. Similarly, the tracks appear darker where the rover's wheels disturbed the top layer of dust.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2012-09-visible...-mars.html#jCp


Wondering why the Moon is so difficult... can't be much sunshine there ????


If by any stretch of the imagination you are supposing that the Moon landings were fake, I suggest that you do a bit of googling, because they do now have photographic evidence from one of the Lunar orbiters of Lunar landing modules and yes even tracks etc....

Havn't you noticed the Moon conspiracy ratbags have been silent of late?

griddle 09-07-2012 02:53 PM

http://www.space.com/12796-photos-ap...sites-lro.html



http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...ollosites.html

finasteridonline 09-07-2012 03:47 PM

Quote:

If by any stretch of the imagination you are supposing that the Moon landings were fake, I suggest that you do a bit of googling, because they do now have photographic evidence from one of the Lunar orbiters of Lunar landing modules and yes even tracks etc....

Havn't you noticed the Moon conspiracy ratbags have been silent of late?
They'll only claim the new photos are faked too. They're not worth the effort of thinking about them.

cheapphenonline 09-07-2012 03:52 PM

Quote:

Wondering why the Moon is so difficult... can't be much sunshine there ????
Just better equipment flying around mars. The photos of the Apollo landing site were taken with "narrow angle cameras" while the HiRISE instrument that took the photos of Curiosity's landing site is a 0.5m scope.

KLIMOV25gyi 09-08-2012 12:50 AM

Well those photos seem to be real

I will check the actual sites soon enough.....

Sorry, But I still don't believe the USA

Rasklad 09-08-2012 01:25 AM

Quote:

Well those photos seem to be real

I will check the actual sites soon enough.....
Taking the water powered space Landy for a spin?

GustavM 09-08-2012 04:37 AM

yes they are real

sEe 09-08-2012 05:09 PM

Quote:

Well those photos seem to be real

I will check the actual sites soon enough.....

Sorry, But I still don't believe the USA
I await your findings on the matter along with the rest of the world, and look forward to revealing the hoax to all and sundry. [tic]

arreskslarlig 09-08-2012 05:13 PM

Quote:

I await your findings on the matter along with the rest of the world, and look forward to revealing the hoax to all and sundry. [tic]
anybody care to tell me what [tic] means?

Coellacag 09-08-2012 05:14 PM

Quote:

anybody care to tell me what [tic] means?
Tongue in cheek :-)

Cogebrego 09-08-2012 05:18 PM

Quote:

Tongue in cheek :-)
Oh, of course. thanks BC

aquadayAquaks 09-08-2012 06:13 PM

http://i.space.com/images/i/15834/i0...nding-site.jpg

How many times has the USA set down on the Moon ?

bobibnoxx 09-08-2012 06:14 PM

both manned and unmanned? or just unmanned? or just manned? set down including crashes or not?

intisgunkas 09-08-2012 06:17 PM

What I was wondering was how many landers (maned or unmanned) litter the lunar landscape ??

Gulauur 09-08-2012 06:17 PM

so you want total of all countries or just the USA?

LoloLibia 09-08-2012 06:18 PM

6

mincarlie.frymyer 09-08-2012 06:20 PM

OK 6

What about manned landings ?

Andrius 09-08-2012 06:22 PM

that is manned. sheesh.

Info-phone 09-08-2012 06:25 PM

There have been six manned moon landings -
Apollo 11 landed 20 July 1969
Apollo 12 landed 19 November 1969
Apollo 14 landed 5 February 1971
Apollo 15 landed 30 July 1971
Apollo 16 landed 20 April 1972
Apollo 17 landed 11 December 1972


The NASA Apollo missions also included 3 manned missions that only orbited the Moon : Apollo 8, 10, and 13 (the Apollo 13 landing mission was canceled after damage from an explosion).
There have been numerous unmanned moon landings, 13 soft landings are listed as well as 26 crash landings. Crash landings listed include retired satellites and orbiters, impactors, as well as failed soft landings.

USSR probes
Luna 2 crashed 13 September 1959
Luna 5 crashed 12 May 1965
Luna 7 crashed 7 October 1965
Luna 8 crashed 6 December 1965
Luna 9 landed 3 February 1966
Luna 13 landed 24 December 1966
Luna 15 crashed 21 July 1969
Luna 16 landed 20 September 1970
Luna 17 landed 17 November 1970
Luna 18 crashed 11 September 1971
Luna 20 landed 21 February 1972
Luna 21 landed 15 January 1973
Luna 23 landed 6 November 1974
Luna 24 landed 18 August 1976

NASA / US probes
Ranger 4 crashed 26 April 1962
Ranger 6 crashed 2 February 1964
Ranger 7 crashed 31 July 1964
Ranger 8 crashed 20 February 1965
Ranger 9 crashed 24 March 1965
Surveyor 1 landed 2 June 1966
Surveyor 2 crashed 23 September 1966
Surveyor 3 landed 20 April 1967
Surveyor 4 crashed (or possibly exploded just above surface) 17 July 1967
Surveyor 5 landed 11 September 1967
Surveyor 6 landed 10 November 1967
Surveyor 7 landed 10 January 1968
Lunar Orbiter 1 crashed 29 October 1966
Lunar Orbiter 2 crashed 11 October 1967
Lunar Orbiter 3 crashed 9 October 1967
Lunar Orbiter 4 crashed 31 October 1967
Lunar Orbiter 5 crashed 31 January 1968
Lunar Prospector crashed 31 July 1999
LCROSS crashed 9 October 2009

Other Space Agency Probes
Hiten (Japan) crashed 10 April 1993
SMART 1 (ESA) crashed 3 September 2006
MIP (India) crashed 14 November 2008
Okina (Japan) crashed 12 February 2009
Chang'e 1 (China) crashed 1 March 2009
Kaguya (Japan) crashed 10 June 2009

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_m...ave_there_been


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2