[Green_Monkey23]

colbydog, what does that have to do with thugs? The fact that its in a black or hispanic neighborhood doesnt mean that if theirs a dog attack that it belongs to a thug. My confusion is more with how does a middle class white person having a pit bull and it attack someone differ from a poor black person differ beside of social status. If their dog attacks someone and killed someone based on carelessness then they are both ignorant in my opinion. As skippy said, being a thug doesnt recognize ethnic boundaries, a thug is simply a thug. If that were the case these dogs would just have a bad rep here in the us but yet they are also banned in other countries, why? because of irresponsible owners not "black people" "hispanic people" im all for putting the blame on where its deserved but to say that even the majority of it is because of thugs is obviously wrong. I can agree on the name of certain dog lines but lets be real, how many of the average mid class white people actually know what gotti line is or has even visited one these websites. As i said before, pit bull are more popular in these neighborhoods, but that doesnt mean that they are all owned by thugs, maybe it would be that because their may be a higher number of byb that they are easier to come buy then a poodle or etc