LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-25-2011, 02:25 PM   #1
CaseyFronczekHomie

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
398
Senior Member
Default Thought Experiment - Propeller in the Exhaust
This is just a crazy sort of idea, but if you could throw some sort of turbine/propeller/impeller in the exhaust and rather than used it to drive a compressor, used it to generate electricity, would the rules allow that extra electric energy to be returned into the KERS system?

I'm not suggesting force-feeding the engine as per either a supercharger or turbocharger, but I am suggesting putting all that wasted energy to use.

Thoughts?
CaseyFronczekHomie is offline


Old 10-25-2011, 05:30 PM   #2
pepBarihepe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
487
Senior Member
Default
I think it would be permitted, but the rules say the KERS can only recover energy during braking. The rest of the time it would just be an obstruction in the exhaust. So it probably wouldn't represent any gain over the existing crankshaft-driven systems. Could be an interesting concept to include in future engine regulations though.
pepBarihepe is offline


Old 10-25-2011, 05:32 PM   #3
amberamuletuk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
363
Senior Member
Default
Isn't that a bit like putting a dynamo in the drivetrain? parasitic energy conversion? Not to mention that F1 engines spend many hours on flow benches to match exhaust pulse/wave resonance with intake harmonics, doing anything to mess that up these dynamics is a no-no.

Converting wasted energy from braking makes the most sense.
amberamuletuk is offline


Old 10-25-2011, 06:41 PM   #4
amberamuletuk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
363
Senior Member
Default
If it were within the rules, this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automot...tric_generator would make better use of exhaust gas energy if they could do it in such a way as to remove any flow hinderance.
amberamuletuk is offline


Old 10-26-2011, 04:21 AM   #5
Biassasecumma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
740
Senior Member
Default
Isn't that a bit like putting a dynamo in the drivetrain? parasitic energy conversion? Not to mention that F1 engines spend many hours on flow benches to match exhaust pulse/wave resonance with intake harmonics, doing anything to mess that up these dynamics is a no-no.

Converting wasted energy from braking makes the most sense.
Exactly.
Biassasecumma is offline


Old 10-27-2011, 12:15 PM   #6
Munccoughe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
544
Senior Member
Default
The aero implications of such a move would also make it a bad idea.
Munccoughe is offline


Old 10-27-2011, 01:40 PM   #7
Stengapsept

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
651
Senior Member
Default
This is just a crazy sort of idea, but if you could throw some sort of turbine/propeller/impeller in the exhaust and rather than used it to drive a compressor, used it to generate electricity, would the rules allow that extra electric energy to be returned into the KERS system?

I'm not suggesting force-feeding the engine as per either a supercharger or turbocharger, but I am suggesting putting all that wasted energy to use.

Thoughts?
It kind of is just a turbo used in a different way. My thought is that you would lose power due to a restriction in the exhaust?
Stengapsept is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity