General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
"The author provides a rather detailed description of the data analysis process used in this study, but does not relate his data analysis strategy to the common and well-known strategies described in the published literature."
So common that few research papers mention it, and those that do won't give a detailed description of their analysis as well (this is an either or thing tard!). So common that he didn't point this out in the draft that I sent him a month ago. So common that the ****ing dean of the school told me to not mention it by name and instead write a detailed description of what I did. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
He loved my lit review. Everyone did. Besides my methodology is really the only option for this type of study. All he wanted was for me to mention two words that the dean told me to take out. It's obvious what I did. If someone couldn't recognize it then by just putting those two words, they wouldn't know what I was talking about. I'm so looking forward to talking to the dean about this on Monday.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
I bookmarked this thread Now how to be a successful PhD professor for masters students: 1. Don't do any research (the fewer publications the better. If you have more than 1 paper where you are first author in a ten year span, you are doing it wrong) 2. Network all the time. This makes you look busy. Sure, you are spending half your day at a coffee shop, but as far as everyone else knows, you're in a busy meeting. 3. Kiss up to undergrads. They are young and naive and generally won't see that you're a phony. 4. Pay off grad students. Be the "friend" professor. The David Brent of academics. Host at least one "happy hour" a month. 5. Radically change your research interests on a yearly basis. That way you can always cover up your ignorance by saying that your just getting into the field. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
As I've never been interested in remaining within the ivory tower, I've not paid much attention to them; however, I've 5 advisors (2 retired but teaching a class or two) who are all accomplished publishers and exceptional teachers. We get to pick our committee.
In my master's, the department found an advisor for each of us (mine was pretty good, an ethnoarchaeologist) but one's advisor need not be a major factor in a largely descriptive study. He supplied some great sources (Netting and Stone). In my Phd, I've had classes with all of my committee and they have intimate knowledge of my background, work, interests and intentions. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|